BACKGROUND: Boarding of admitted patients in the emergency department (ED) is a major cause of crowding. One alternative to boarding in the ED, a full-capacity protocol where boarded patients are redeployed to inpatient units, can reduce crowding and improve overall flow. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare patient satisfaction with boarding in the ED vs. inpatient hallways. METHODS: We performed a structured telephone survey regarding patient experiences and preferences for boarding among admitted ED patients who experienced boarding in the ED hallway and then were subsequently transferred to inpatient hallways. Demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as patient preferences, including items related to patient comfort and safety using a 5-point scale, were recorded and descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. RESULTS: Of 110 patients contacted, 105 consented to participate. Mean age was 57 ± 16 years and 52% were female. All patients were initially boarded in the ED in a hallway before their transfer to an inpatient hallway bed. The overall preferred location after admission was the inpatient hallway in 85% (95% confidence interval 75-90) of respondents. In comparing ED vs. inpatient hallway boarding, the following percentages of respondents preferred inpatient boarding with regard to the following 8 items: rest, 85%; safety, 83%; confidentiality, 82%; treatment, 78%; comfort, 79%; quiet, 84%; staff availability, 84%; and privacy, 84%. For no item was there a preference for boarding in the ED. CONCLUSIONS: Patients overwhelmingly preferred the inpatient hallway rather than the ED hallway when admitted to the hospital.
BACKGROUND: Boarding of admitted patients in the emergency department (ED) is a major cause of crowding. One alternative to boarding in the ED, a full-capacity protocol where boarded patients are redeployed to inpatient units, can reduce crowding and improve overall flow. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare patient satisfaction with boarding in the ED vs. inpatient hallways. METHODS: We performed a structured telephone survey regarding patient experiences and preferences for boarding among admitted ED patients who experienced boarding in the ED hallway and then were subsequently transferred to inpatient hallways. Demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as patient preferences, including items related to patient comfort and safety using a 5-point scale, were recorded and descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. RESULTS: Of 110 patients contacted, 105 consented to participate. Mean age was 57 ± 16 years and 52% were female. All patients were initially boarded in the ED in a hallway before their transfer to an inpatient hallway bed. The overall preferred location after admission was the inpatient hallway in 85% (95% confidence interval 75-90) of respondents. In comparing ED vs. inpatient hallway boarding, the following percentages of respondents preferred inpatient boarding with regard to the following 8 items: rest, 85%; safety, 83%; confidentiality, 82%; treatment, 78%; comfort, 79%; quiet, 84%; staff availability, 84%; and privacy, 84%. For no item was there a preference for boarding in the ED. CONCLUSIONS:Patients overwhelmingly preferred the inpatient hallway rather than the ED hallway when admitted to the hospital.
Authors: Mark McClelland; Brent Asplin; Stephen K Epstein; Keith Eric Kocher; Randy Pilgrim; Jesse Pines; Elaine Judith Rabin; Niels Kumar Rathlev Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: George L Anesi; Vincent X Liu; Marzana Chowdhury; Dylan S Small; Wei Wang; M Kit Delgado; Brian Bayes; Erich Dress; Gabriel J Escobar; Scott D Halpern Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 30.528
Authors: Courtney M Smalley; Erin L Simon; Stephen W Meldon; McKinsey R Muir; Isaac Briskin; Steven Crane; Fernando Delgado; Bradford L Borden; Baruch S Fertel Journal: J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Date: 2020-05-23
Authors: Amir Alishahi Tabriz; Sarah A Birken; Christopher M Shea; Bruce J Fried; Peter Viccellio Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2019-07-18 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Peter McKenna; Samita M Heslin; Peter Viccellio; William K Mallon; Cristina Hernandez; Eric J Morley Journal: Clin Exp Emerg Med Date: 2019-07-12