Literature DB >> 24062929

An assessment of composite measures of hospital performance and associated mortality for patients with acute myocardial infarction. Analysis of individual hospital performance and outcome for the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (NICOR).

Alexander D Simms1, Paul D Baxter, Brian A Cattle, Phillip D Batin, John I Wilson, Robert M West, Alistair S Hall, Clive F Weston, John E Deanfield, Keith A Fox, Chris P Gale.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate whether a hospital-specific opportunity-based composite score (OBCS) was associated with mortality in 136,392 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) using data from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) 2008-2009. METHODS AND
RESULTS: For 199 hospitals a multidimensional hospital OBCS was calculated on the number of times that aspirin, thienopyridine, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi), statin, β-blocker, and referral for cardiac rehabilitation was given to individual patients, divided by the overall number of opportunities that hospitals had to give that care. OBCS and its six components were compared using funnel plots. Associations between OBCS performance and 30-day and 6-month all-cause mortality were quantified using mixed-effects regression analysis. Median hospital OBCS was 95.3% (range 75.8-100%). By OBCS, 24.1% of hospitals were below funnel plot 99.8% CI, compared to aspirin (11.1%), thienopyridine (15.1%), β-blockers (14.7%), ACEi (19.1%), statins (12.1%), and cardiac rehabilitation (17.6%) on discharge. Mortality (95% CI) decreased with increasing hospital OBCS quartile at 30 days [Q1, 2.25% (2.07-2.43%) vs. Q4, 1.40% (1.25-1.56%)] and 6 months [Q1, 7.93% (7.61-8.25%) vs. Q4, 5.53% (5.22-5.83%)]. Hospital OBCS quartile was inversely associated with adjusted 30-day and 6-month mortality [OR (95% CI), 0.87 (0.80-0.94) and 0.92 (0.88-0.96), respectively] and persisted after adjustment for coronary artery catheterization [0.89 (0.82-0.96) and 0.95 (0.91-0.98), respectively].
CONCLUSIONS: Multidimensional hospital OBCS in AMI survivors are high, discriminate hospital performance more readily than single performance indicators, and significantly inversely predict early and longer-term mortality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myocardial infarction; composite performance indicators; mortality; performance; quality of care

Year:  2013        PMID: 24062929      PMCID: PMC3760578          DOI: 10.1177/2048872612469132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care        ISSN: 2048-8726


  35 in total

1.  Association between hospital process performance and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Eric D Peterson; Matthew T Roe; Jyotsna Mulgund; Elizabeth R DeLong; Barbara L Lytle; Ralph G Brindis; Sidney C Smith; Charles V Pollack; L Kristin Newby; Robert A Harrington; W Brian Gibler; E Magnus Ohman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  National audit of myocardial infarction (MINAP): a project in evolution.

Authors:  John Birkhead; Lynne Walker
Journal:  Hosp Med       Date:  2004-08

3.  Comparison of composite measure methodologies for rewarding quality of care: an analysis from the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines program.

Authors:  Zubin J Eapen; Gregg C Fonarow; David Dai; Sean M O'Brien; Lee H Schwamm; Christopher P Cannon; Paul A Heidenreich; Deepak L Bhatt; Eric D Peterson; Adrian F Hernandez
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2011-10-18

4.  How robust are hospital ranks based on composite performance measures?

Authors:  Rowena Jacobs; Maria Goddard; Peter C Smith
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association methodology for the selection and creation of performance measures for quantifying the quality of cardiovascular care.

Authors:  John A Spertus; Kim A Eagle; Harlan M Krumholz; Kristi R Mitchell; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  All-or-none measurement raises the bar on performance.

Authors:  Thomas Nolan; Donald M Berwick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Authors:  Christian W Hamm; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Stefan Agewall; Jeroen Bax; Eric Boersma; Hector Bueno; Pio Caso; Dariusz Dudek; Stephan Gielen; Kurt Huber; Magnus Ohman; Mark C Petrie; Frank Sonntag; Miguel Sousa Uva; Robert F Storey; William Wijns; Doron Zahger
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Hospital quality for acute myocardial infarction: correlation among process measures and relationship with short-term mortality.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Jeph Herrin; Brian Elbel; Robert L McNamara; David J Magid; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Yongfei Wang; Sharon-Lise T Normand; John A Spertus; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observational study (GRACE).

Authors:  Keith A A Fox; Omar H Dabbous; Robert J Goldberg; Karen S Pieper; Kim A Eagle; Frans Van de Werf; Alvaro Avezum; Shaun G Goodman; Marcus D Flather; Frederick A Anderson; Christopher B Granger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-10-10

10.  The Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP).

Authors:  Emily Herrett; Liam Smeeth; Lynne Walker; Clive Weston
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.994

View more
  12 in total

1.  A pressure ulcer and fall rate quality composite index for acute care units: A measure development study.

Authors:  Diane K Boyle; Ananda Jayawardhana; Mary E Burman; Nancy E Dunton; Vincent S Staggs; Sandra Bergquist-Beringer; Byron J Gajewski
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 5.837

Review 2.  Assessing Performance and Quality After Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Authors:  H Vernon Anderson; Robin Jacob
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Effect of pooled comparative information on judgments of quality.

Authors:  Leigh A Baumgart; Ellen J Bass; John D Voss; Jason A Lyman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.968

Review 4.  Risk stratification for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Richard A Brogan; Christopher J Malkin; Phillip D Batin; Alexander D Simms; James M McLenachan; Christopher P Gale
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-26

5.  Composite measures of quality of health care: Evidence mapping of methodology and reporting.

Authors:  Pinar Kara; Jan Brink Valentin; Jan Mainz; Søren Paaske Johnsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Geographic variation in the treatment of non-ST-segment myocardial infarction in the English National Health Service: a cohort study.

Authors:  T B Dondo; M Hall; A D Timmis; A T Yan; P D Batin; G Oliver; O A Alabas; P Norman; J E Deanfield; K Bloor; H Hemingway; C P Gale
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Performance of hospitals according to the ESC ACCA quality indicators and 30-day mortality for acute myocardial infarction: national cohort study using the United Kingdom Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) register.

Authors:  Owen Bebb; Marlous Hall; Keith A A Fox; Tatendashe B Dondo; Adam Timmis; Hector Bueno; François Schiele; Chris P Gale
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  How, in what contexts, and why do quality dashboards lead to improvements in care quality in acute hospitals? Protocol for a realist feasibility evaluation.

Authors:  Rebecca Randell; Natasha Alvarado; Lynn McVey; Joanne Greenhalgh; Robert M West; Amanda Farrin; Chris Gale; Roger Parslow; Justin Keen; Mai Elshehaly; Roy A Ruddle; Julia Lake; Mamas Mamas; Richard Feltbower; Dawn Dowding
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  Quality markers in cardiology: measures of outcomes and clinical practice--a perspective of the Spanish Society of Cardiology and of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

Authors:  José-Luis López-Sendón; José Ramón González-Juanatey; Fausto Pinto; José Cuenca Castillo; Lina Badimón; Regina Dalmau; Esteban González Torrecilla; José Ramón López Mínguez; Alicia M Maceira; Domingo Pascual-Figal; José Luis Pomar Moya-Prats; Alessandro Sionis; José Luis Zamorano
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Evaluation of the impact of the GRACE risk score on the management and outcome of patients hospitalised with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome in the UK: protocol of the UKGRIS cluster-randomised registry-based trial.

Authors:  Colin C Everett; Keith Aa Fox; Catherine Reynolds; Catherine Fernandez; Linda Sharples; Deborah D Stocken; Kathryn Carruthers; Harry Hemingway; Andrew T Yan; Shaun G Goodman; David Brieger; Derek P Chew; Chris P Gale
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.