BACKGROUND: Reperfusion delay in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) predicts adverse outcome. We evaluated time from alarm call (system delay) and time from first medical contact (PCI-related delay), where fibrinolysis could be initiated, to balloon inflation in a pre-hospital organization with tele-transmitted electrocardiograms, field triage and direct transfer to a 24/7 primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) center. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a single center cohort study with long-term follow-up in 472 patients. The PPCI center registry was linked by person identification number to emergency medical services (EMS) and National Board of Health databases in the period of 2005-2008. Patients were stratified according to transfer distances to PPCI into zone 1 (0-25 km), zone 2 (65-100 km) and zone 3 (101-185 km) and according to referral by pre-hospital triage. System delay was 86 minutes (interquartile range (IQR) 72-113) in zone 1, 133 (116-180) in zone 2 and 173 (145-215) in zone 3 (p<0.001). PCI-related delay in directly referred patients was 109 (92-121) minutes in zone 2, but exceeded recommendations in zone 3 (139 (121-160)) and for patients admitted via the local hospital (219 (171-250)). System delay was an independent predictor of mortality (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-hospital triage is feasible in 73% of patients. PCI-related delay exceeded European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for patients living >100 km away and for non-directly referred patients. Sorting the PPCI centers catchment area into geographical zones identifies patients with long reperfusion delays. Possible solutions are pharmaco-invasive regiments, research in early ischemia detection, airborne transfer and EMS personnel education that ensures pre-hospital triage.
BACKGROUND: Reperfusion delay in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) predicts adverse outcome. We evaluated time from alarm call (system delay) and time from first medical contact (PCI-related delay), where fibrinolysis could be initiated, to balloon inflation in a pre-hospital organization with tele-transmitted electrocardiograms, field triage and direct transfer to a 24/7 primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) center. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a single center cohort study with long-term follow-up in 472 patients. The PPCI center registry was linked by person identification number to emergency medical services (EMS) and National Board of Health databases in the period of 2005-2008. Patients were stratified according to transfer distances to PPCI into zone 1 (0-25 km), zone 2 (65-100 km) and zone 3 (101-185 km) and according to referral by pre-hospital triage. System delay was 86 minutes (interquartile range (IQR) 72-113) in zone 1, 133 (116-180) in zone 2 and 173 (145-215) in zone 3 (p<0.001). PCI-related delay in directly referred patients was 109 (92-121) minutes in zone 2, but exceeded recommendations in zone 3 (139 (121-160)) and for patients admitted via the local hospital (219 (171-250)). System delay was an independent predictor of mortality (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-hospital triage is feasible in 73% of patients. PCI-related delay exceeded European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for patients living >100 km away and for non-directly referred patients. Sorting the PPCI centers catchment area into geographical zones identifies patients with long reperfusion delays. Possible solutions are pharmaco-invasive regiments, research in early ischemia detection, airborne transfer and EMS personnel education that ensures pre-hospital triage.
Authors: Timothy D Henry; Scott W Sharkey; M Nicholas Burke; Ivan J Chavez; Kevin J Graham; Christopher R Henry; Daniel L Lips; James D Madison; Katie M Menssen; Michael R Mooney; Marc C Newell; Wes R Pedersen; Anil K Poulose; Jay H Traverse; Barbara T Unger; Yale L Wang; David M Larson Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-08-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Henry H Ting; Charanjit S Rihal; Bernard J Gersh; Luis H Haro; Christine M Bjerke; Ryan J Lennon; Choon-Chern Lim; John F Bresnahan; Allan S Jaffe; David R Holmes; Malcolm R Bell Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-08-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Peter H Nielsen; Christian J Terkelsen; Torsten T Nielsen; Leif Thuesen; Lars R Krusell; Per Thayssen; Henning Kelbaek; Ulrik Abildgaard; Anton B Villadsen; Henning R Andersen; Michael Maeng Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2011-07-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Ayman K M Hassan; Su San Liem; Frank van der Kley; Sandrin C Bergheanu; Ron Wolterbeek; Jan Bosch; Marianne Bootsma; Katja Zeppenfeld; Arnoud van der Laarse; Douwe E Atsma; J Wouter Jukema; Martin J Schalij Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2009-08-01 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Cynthia M Westerhout; Eric Bonnefoy; Robert C Welsh; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Florent Boutitie; Paul W Armstrong Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Karim D Mahmoud; Youlan L Gu; Maarten W Nijsten; Ronald de Vos; Wybe Nieuwland; Felix Zijlstra; Hans L Hillege; Iwan C van der Horst; Bart Jgl de Smet Journal: Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care Date: 2013-06
Authors: Alessandra Batista Teixeira; Leonardo Fiaschi Zancaner; Fernando Fonseca de França Ribeiro; José Paulo Pintyá; André Schmidt; Benedito Carlos Maciel; José Antônio Marin Neto; Carlos Henrique Miranda Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2022-03 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Roman Pfister; Samuel Lee; Kathrin Kuhr; Frank Baer; Wolfgang Fehske; Hans-Wilhelm Hoepp; Stephan Baldus; Guido Michels Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 3.240