Literature DB >> 24061971

Sagittal balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: radiographic study of spino-pelvic compensation after surgery.

Giovanni Andrea La Maida1, Leonardo Zottarelli, Giuseppe Vincenzo Mineo, Bernardo Misaggi.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Radiographic retrospective study of a consecutive series of 76 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) undergoing posterior only surgical correction and fusion.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sagittal profile changes in a population of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after posterior only surgical correction. Although the relationship between pelvic indexes and sagittal profile is well known, little has been published about the sagittal profile changes after posterior surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
METHODS: Radiological data of 76 AIS patients were analyzed by an independent observer to compare pelvic indexes and spino-pelvic parameters before and at the last follow-up after surgical posterior correction. All patients underwent a posterior only surgical correction by using different anchor techniques (all screws or hybrid construct), but the same derotation correction maneuver (C-D technique). The collected data were analyzed, on AP and LL radiographic views of the entire spine in the upright position, from the same independent observer and using the same Impax software analysis. We collected for each patient on latero-lateral X-rays the following data: pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), C7 plumb line (C7PL) and spino-sacral angle (SSA). All data were analyzed using a D'Agostino-Pearson normality test and the comparison between the groups was performed with a student's t test.
RESULTS: The mean pelvic incidence (PI) of the cohort was 48.89° (± 11.24), with a mean Cobb angle for the main curve of 60.13° (± 13.6). The mean value of residual scoliosis after surgery was 28.18° (± 13.22) with an average improvement of the curve in the frontal plane of 53.2 %. The amount of curve correction of the primary scoliosis curve was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). In the evaluation of the whole group after surgery, we observed an increasing amount of PT (average delta value 2.38°) with a statistical significance (p = 0.0034). If we compare the mean ideal PT value (11.09°) with the pre- and post-operative mean true PT values, we found statistical significance only for the post-operative difference (p = 0.0014). In the general assessment, C7PL seems to remain stable after surgery, and in particular it remains negative. In Lenke 1 group, there was a mean PI value of 50.54° (± 11.45) which is higher than the one reported in the global assessment. Also in this subgroup, we observed a reduction in the mean SS values, with consequent increase in the PT values, as in the general assessment. The C7PL tends to move posteriorly after surgery and this difference is statistically significant. In Lenke 1 group we found a strong statistical significance between pre- and post-surgery data for the Cobb primary curve and for the C7PL, which continues to remain negative. The C7PL remains relatively stable only in the normokyphotic group, while it tends to move behind in the other three groups (Lenke 3, hyperkyphosis and hypokyphosis).
CONCLUSIONS: In our series of 76 adolescent affected by AIS, we reported mean PI values of 48.9° with a mean pre-operative PT of 11.51°. After surgery we observed an increase in the PT mean value, about three degrees higher than the ideal value, meaning that there was some compensatory mechanism. Patients affected by AIS showed a slight posterior imbalance and the intervention of scoliosis correction seems to cause a slight further posterior imbalance, especially in Lenke 1 type curves and in patients with hypokyphosis. The clinical significance of this slight imbalance must be carefully evaluated. Further studies are necessary to better establish which could be the best surgical strategy to obtain an optimal spinal sagittal balance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24061971      PMCID: PMC3830044          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-3018-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  13 in total

1.  Sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis during growth.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Eric Berthonnaud; John R Dimar; Randal R Betz; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Pelvic parameters: origin and significance.

Authors:  J C Le Huec; S Aunoble; Leijssen Philippe; Pellet Nicolas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves.

Authors:  J Legaye; G Duval-Beaupère; J Hecquet; C Marty
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Pediatric sagittal alignment.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Hubert Labelle; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. Biplanar spinal asymmetry.

Authors:  R A Dickson; J O Lawton; I A Archer; W P Butt
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1984-01

6.  Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Raphaël Vialle; Nicolas Levassor; Ludovic Rillardon; Alexandre Templier; Wafa Skalli; Pierre Guigui
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position.

Authors:  Pierre Roussouly; Sohrab Gollogly; Eric Berthonnaud; Johanes Dimnet
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Sagittal spinopelvic balance in normal children and adolescents.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Hubert Labelle; Eric Berthonnaud; Randal R Betz; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-26       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  A Barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: the conditions required for an economic standing position.

Authors:  G Duval-Beaupère; C Schmidt; P Cosson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Pre- and post-operative sagittal balance in idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison over the ages of two cohorts of 132 adolescents and 52 adults.

Authors:  Pierre Roussouly; Hubert Labelle; Jihane Rouissi; Arnaud Bodin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  23 in total

1.  Analysis of cervical kyphosis and spinal balance in young idiopathic scoliosis patients classified by the apex of thoracic kyphosis.

Authors:  Kenyu Ito; Shiro Imagama; Zenya Ito; Kei Ando; Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Tetsuro Hida; Mikito Tsushima; Yoshimoto Ishikawa; Akiyuki Matsumoto; Yoshihiro Nishida; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Sagittal spino-pelvic adjustment in severe Lenke 1 hypokyphotic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.

Authors:  Christophe Vidal; Keyvan Mazda; Brice Ilharreborde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Sagittal balance and idiopathic scoliosis: does final sagittal alignment influence outcomes, degeneration rate or failure rate?

Authors:  Brice Ilharreborde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  High-heeled-related alterations in the static sagittal profile of the spino-pelvic structure in young women.

Authors:  Min Dai; Xiaofeng Li; Xin Zhou; Yiqiang Hu; Qiang Luo; Song Zhou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Very long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes after posterior spinal fusion with pedicular screws for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Alice Darnis; Pierre Grobost; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-10-08

Review 6.  [Adolescent scoliosis : From deformity to treatment].

Authors:  A Schulze; S Schrading; M Betsch; V Quack; M Tingart
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Evaluation of a new sagittal classification system in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Sidsel Fruergaard; Mohit J Jain; Lorenzo Deveza; David Liu; John Heydemann; Søren Ohrt-Nissen; Casper Dragsted; Martin Gehrchen; Benny Dahl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Three-dimensional pelvic incidence is much higher in (thoraco)lumbar scoliosis than in controls.

Authors:  Rob C Brink; Ludvig Vavruch; Tom P C Schlösser; Kasim Abul-Kasim; Acke Ohlin; Hans Tropp; René M Castelein; Tomaž Vrtovec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Selective versus hyperselective posterior fusions in Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  B Ilharreborde; E Ferrero; A Angelliaume; Y Lefèvre; F Accadbled; A L Simon; J Sales de Gauzy; K Mazda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Focal disorders of the spine with compensatory deformities: how to define them.

Authors:  Andrea Redaelli; Pedro Berjano; Max Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.