Literature DB >> 24061789

The impact of an anti-idling campaign on outdoor air quality at four urban schools.

Patrick H Ryan1, Tiina Reponen, Mark Simmons, Michael Yermakov, Ken Sharkey, Denisha Garland-Porter, Cynthia Eghbalnia, Sergey A Grinshpun.   

Abstract

Idling school buses may increase concentrations of air pollutants including fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and elemental carbon (EC) near schools. Efforts to reduce vehicle idling near schools have rarely included air sampling to objectively assess changes in concentrations of air pollutants. The objective was to determine the impact of an anti-idling campaign on outdoor air quality at four schools with varying exposure to bus and automobile traffic. Outdoor air sampling for PM2.5, EC and particle number concentration (PNC) was conducted at four schools for five days before and after an anti-idling campaign. Sampling began before the morning arrival of buses and concluded after their afternoon departure. Sampling was simultaneously conducted at four corresponding community sites. Differences in PM2.5, EC, and PNC measured at school and community sites for each sampling day were calculated before and after the campaign. Before the campaign, the average outdoor concentration of PM2.5 during the school day at three of the four schools exceeded community background levels and the difference was greatest (4.11 μg m(-3), p < 0.01) at the school with the most buses (n = 39). The largest difference in EC between school and community sites was also observed at the school with the greatest number of buses (0.40 μg m(-3), p < 0.01). Following the anti-idling campaign, the average difference in PM2.5 at the school with the most buses decreased from 4.11 μg m(-3) to 0.99 μg m(-3) (p < 0.05). Similarly, at this school, the difference in the EC level decreased from 0.40 μg m(-3) to 0.15 μg m(-3) and PNC decreased from 11,560 to 1690 particles per cm(3) (p < 0.05). The outdoor concentrations of pollutants at schools with fewer buses (n = 5-11) were not significantly reduced. The concentration of air pollutants near schools may significantly exceed community background levels, particularly in the presence of idling school buses. Anti-idling campaigns are effective in reducing PM2.5, EC and PNC at schools with significant amounts of buses and passenger cars.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24061789     DOI: 10.1039/c3em00377a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts        ISSN: 2050-7887            Impact factor:   4.238


  6 in total

Review 1.  New Methods for Personal Exposure Monitoring for Airborne Particles.

Authors:  Kirsten A Koehler; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  Local action on outdoor air pollution to improve public health.

Authors:  Sotiris Vardoulakis; Rachel Kettle; Paul Cosford; Paul Lincoln; Stephen Holgate; Jonathan Grigg; Frank Kelly; David Pencheon
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  'Every breath we take: the lifelong impact of air pollution' - a call for action.

Authors:  Stephen T Holgate
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.659

4.  Personal strategies to minimise effects of air pollution on respiratory health: advice for providers, patients and the public.

Authors:  Christopher Carlsten; Sundeep Salvi; Gary W K Wong; Kian Fan Chung
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 5.  Air Pollution and Asthma: Critical Targets for Effective Action.

Authors:  Frank J Kelly; Ian S Mudway; Julia C Fussell
Journal:  Pulm Ther       Date:  2020-11-08

6.  Traffic-related air pollution reduction at UK schools during the Covid-19 lockdown.

Authors:  Louis Brown; Jo Barnes; Enda Hayes
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 7.963

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.