Literature DB >> 24061623

Transanal single-port microsurgery for rectal tumors: minimal invasive surgery under spinal anesthesia.

Taek-Gu Lee1, Sang-Jeon Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for rectal tumors has been introduced as an alternative approach to transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). TEM has some limitations, such as the need for special equipment, expensive cost, and steep learning curve. In this study, we address the technical feasibility of TAMIS under spinal anesthesia and its short-term postoperative outcomes.
METHODS: From July 2011 to September 2012, 25 consecutive patients with middle or upper third rectal masses underwent TAMIS. Tumors were located 6-17 cm from the anal verge. After spinal anesthesia, a single-incision laparoscopic surgery port was inserted into the anal canal. With this access, conventional laparoscopic instruments, including a grasper and monopolar electrocautery and suction device, were used to perform the transanal excision. A hook-type monopolar electrocautery or harmonic scalpel was used for dissection. The defect of the rectum was closed by interrupted sutures. Data concerning demographics, details of operative procedure, postoperative pain, and pathologic results were collected prospectively. To evaluate anal sphincter injury, an endoanal ultrasonography and fecal incontinence severity index survey were performed at 3-6 months after the operation.
RESULTS: Of the 25 patients, nine had adenocarcinomas, nine had neuroendocrine tumors, three had tubular adenomas with high-grade dysplasia, three had tubular adenomas, one had a tubulovillous adenoma, and one had a gastrointestinal stromal tumor. The median distance from the tumor mass to the anal verge was 9.0 (range 6-17) cm. The median operative time was 45.0 (range 20-120) min. All patients received TAMIS without conversion to laparoscopic resection. There were no intraoperative complications or postoperative morbidity. The median postoperative hospital stay was 3.0 (range 2-7) days. No sphincter injury was detected by endoanal ultrasonography.
CONCLUSIONS: TAMIS under spinal anesthesia is a safe and feasible technique for resection of middle and upper rectal masses. Spinal anesthesia is adequate for this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24061623     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3184-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  35 in total

1.  Use of a SILS port in transanal endoscopic microsurgery in the setting of a community hospital.

Authors:  Jacob Matz; Alexander Matz
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 1.878

2.  Transanal endoscopic video-assisted (TEVA) excision.

Authors:  Madhu Ragupathi; Dominique Vande Maele; Javier Nieto; T Bartley Pickron; Eric M Haas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward.

Authors:  Sam Atallah; Matthew Albert; Sergio Larach
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  F H Remzi; H T Kirat; J H Kaouk; D P Geisler
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 5.  Surgical resection of rectal adenoma: a rapid review.

Authors:  Damian Casadesus
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Influence of autonomic nerves on the internal and sphincter in man.

Authors:  B Frenckner; T Ihre
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large rectal adenomas.

Authors:  Marco Ettore Allaix; Alberto Arezzo; Paola Cassoni; Federico Famiglietti; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Anorectal sphincter function and rectal barostat study in patients following transanal endoscopic microsurgery.

Authors:  R M Herman; P Richter; P Walega; T Popiela
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Transanal glove port is a safe and cost-effective alternative for transanal endoscopic microsurgery.

Authors:  R Hompes; F Ris; C Cunningham; N J Mortensen; R A Cahill
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Oncological outcome of local vs radical resection of low-risk pT1 rectal cancer.

Authors:  Henry Ptok; Frank Marusch; Frank Meyer; Daniel Schubert; Ferdinand Koeckerling; Ingo Gastinger; Hans Lippert
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2007-07
View more
  20 in total

1.  Transanal endoscopic resection with peritoneal entry: a word of caution.

Authors:  George Molina; Liliana Bordeianou; Paul Shellito; Patricia Sylla
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery: State of the Art.

Authors:  D S Keller; E M Haas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  The transrectal single port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a cadaver model.

Authors:  Oktay Akça; Homayoun Zargar; Riccardo Autorino; Luis Felipe Brandao; Ahmet Selçuk Gürler; Abdullah Avşar; Rahim Horuz; Selami Albayrak
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-06

Review 4.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer: T1 and beyond? An evidence-based review.

Authors:  Marco E Allaix; Alberto Arezzo; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  TAMIS for rectal tumors: advancements of a new approach.

Authors:  Daniela Rega; Ugo Pace; Antonello Niglio; Dario Scala; Cinzia Sassaroli; Paolo Delrio
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-04-06

6.  Surgeons' perceptions of transanal endoscopic microsurgery using minilaparoscopic instruments in a simulator: the thinner the better.

Authors:  Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araujo; Carlos Ramon Silveira Mendes; Gustavo Lopes Carvalho; Marcos Lyra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS): a clinical spotlight review.

Authors:  Teresa deBeche-Adams; Imran Hassan; Stephen Haggerty; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  A systematic review of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) from 2010 to 2013.

Authors:  B Martin-Perez; G D Andrade-Ribeiro; L Hunter; S Atallah
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Perineal sigmoidopexy utilizing transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) to treat full thickness rectal prolapse: a feasibility trial in porcine and human cadaver models.

Authors:  Liliana Bordeianou; Patricia Sylla; Christine V Kinnier; David Rattner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal polyps and selected malignant tumors: caution concerning intermediate-term functional results.

Authors:  S H E M Clermonts; Y T van Loon; A H W Schiphorst; D K Wasowicz; D D E Zimmerman
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.