BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Traditional endoscopic management of benign biliary strictures (BBS) consists of placement of one or more plastic stents. Emerging data support the use of covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMS). We sought to assess outcome of endoscopic temporary placement of CSEMS in patients with BBS. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of CSEMS placement for BBS between May 2005 and July 2012 from two tertiary care centers. A total of 145 patients (81 males, median age 59 years) with BBS were identified; 73 of which were classified as extrinsic and were caused by chronic pancreatitis, and 70 were intrinsic. Main outcome measures were resolution of stricture and adverse events (AEs) due to self-expandable metal stents (SEMS)-related therapy. RESULTS: Fully covered and partially covered 8-10 mm diameter SEMS were placed and subsequently removed in 121/125 (97 %) attempts in BBS (failure to remove four partially covered stents). Stricture resolution occurred in 83/125 (66 %) patients after a median stent duration of 26 weeks (median follow-up 90 weeks). Resolution of extrinsic strictures was significantly lower compared to intrinsic strictures (31/65, 48 % vs. 52/60, 87 %, p = 0.004) despite longer median stent duration (30 vs. 20 weeks). Thirty-seven AEs occurred in 25 patients (17 %), with 12 developing multiple AEs including cholangitis (n = 17), pancreatitis (n = 5), proximal stent migration (n = 3), cholecystitis (n = 2), pain requiring SEMS removal and/or hospitalization (n = 3), inability to remove (n = 4), and new stricture formation (n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: Benign biliary strictures can be effectively treated with CSEMS. Successful resolution of biliary strictures due to extrinsic disease is seen significantly less often than those due to intrinsic disease. Removal is successful in all patients with fully covered SEMS.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Traditional endoscopic management of benign biliary strictures (BBS) consists of placement of one or more plastic stents. Emerging data support the use of covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMS). We sought to assess outcome of endoscopic temporary placement of CSEMS in patients with BBS. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of CSEMS placement for BBS between May 2005 and July 2012 from two tertiary care centers. A total of 145 patients (81 males, median age 59 years) with BBS were identified; 73 of which were classified as extrinsic and were caused by chronic pancreatitis, and 70 were intrinsic. Main outcome measures were resolution of stricture and adverse events (AEs) due to self-expandable metal stents (SEMS)-related therapy. RESULTS: Fully covered and partially covered 8-10 mm diameter SEMS were placed and subsequently removed in 121/125 (97 %) attempts in BBS (failure to remove four partially covered stents). Stricture resolution occurred in 83/125 (66 %) patients after a median stent duration of 26 weeks (median follow-up 90 weeks). Resolution of extrinsic strictures was significantly lower compared to intrinsic strictures (31/65, 48 % vs. 52/60, 87 %, p = 0.004) despite longer median stent duration (30 vs. 20 weeks). Thirty-seven AEs occurred in 25 patients (17 %), with 12 developing multiple AEs including cholangitis (n = 17), pancreatitis (n = 5), proximal stent migration (n = 3), cholecystitis (n = 2), pain requiring SEMS removal and/or hospitalization (n = 3), inability to remove (n = 4), and new stricture formation (n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: Benign biliary strictures can be effectively treated with CSEMS. Successful resolution of biliary strictures due to extrinsic disease is seen significantly less often than those due to intrinsic disease. Removal is successful in all patients with fully covered SEMS.
Authors: Peter B Cotton; Glenn M Eisen; Lars Aabakken; Todd H Baron; Matt M Hutter; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Albert Nemcek; Bret T Petersen; John L Petrini; Irving M Pike; Linda Rabeneck; Joseph Romagnuolo; John J Vargo Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Marc F Catalano; Jeffrey D Linder; Suku George; Eduardo Alcocer; Joseph E Geenen Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Michel Kahaleh; Brian Behm; Bridger W Clarke; Andrew Brock; Vanessa M Shami; Sarah A De La Rue; Vinay Sundaram; Jeffrey Tokar; Reid B Adams; Paul Yeaton Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Payal Saxena; David L Diehl; Vivek Kumbhari; Frederick Shieh; Jonathan M Buscaglia; Wilson Sze; Sumit Kapoor; Srinadh Komanduri; John Nasr; Eun Ji Shin; Vikesh Singh; Anne Marie Lennon; Anthony N Kalloo; Mouen A Khashab Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Arthur Schmidt; Tilman Pickartz; Markus M Lerch; Fabrizio Fanelli; Fausto Fiocca; Pierleone Lucatelli; Fabrizio Cereatti; Albrecht Hoffmeister; Werner van Steenbergen; Matthias Kraft; Benjamin Meier; Karel Caca Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2016-09-07 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Miguel A De Gregorio; Eva Criado; Jose A Guirola; Enrique Alvarez-Arranz; Mercedes Pérez-Lafuente; Marta Barrufet; Maria D Ferrer-Puchol; Sandra Lopez-Minguez; Jose Urbano; Carlos Lanciego; Alexander Aguinaga; Antonio Capel; Maria D Ponce-Dorrego; Abel Gregorio Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 5.315