Literature DB >> 24061512

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors with KIT exon 9 mutations: Update on genotype-phenotype correlation and validation of a high-resolution melting assay for mutational testing.

Helen Künstlinger1, Sebastian Huss, Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse, Elke Binot, Michaela Angelika Kleine, Heike Loeser, Jens Mittler, Wolfgang Hartmann, Peter Hohenberger, Peter Reichardt, Reinhard Büttner, Eva Wardelmann, Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus.   

Abstract

KIT exon 9 mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are highly relevant and have direct therapeutic implications. In this context, we established and validated a fast and sensitive high-resolution melting assay. Analyzing 126 primary and 18 metastatic KIT exon 9-mutated cases from our registry, we demonstrate that the mutational spectrum of exon 9 is broader than previously thought and describe 3 novel mutations. Including these cases and the common p.A502_Y503dup mutation, we provide a comprehensive list of all known KIT exon 9 mutations according to the Human Genome Variation Society nomenclature. Two of the newly described mutations were associated with an aggressive phenotype and tumor progression while being treated with 400 mg imatinib, indicating that also GIST with rare exon 9 mutations could be treated with increased imatinib dosage. On the basis of >1500 GISTs from our registry, we have determined the frequency of KIT exon 9 mutations to be 9.2% among all GISTs and 22.5% among small-bowel cases. We describe for the first time that nearly 20% of exon 9-mutated GIST occur in the stomach or rectum. Furthermore, we provide first evidence that exon 9-mutated GISTs metastasize significantly more often to the peritoneum than to the liver. Performing extensive statistical analyses on data from our registry and from the literature, we demonstrate that KIT exon 9 mutations are neither associated with intermediate-risk/high-risk status nor overrepresented among metastatic lesions. Thus, we conclude that exon 9 mutations per se do not have prognostic relevance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24061512     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182986b88

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  15 in total

Review 1.  [Molecular pathology of soft tissue tumors: Contribution to diagnosis and therapy prediction].

Authors:  K Schmitz; H-U Schildhaus
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  The big, the bad, and the exon 11: adjuvant imatinib for all gastro-intestinal stromal tumors or just the ugly?

Authors:  Roman Groisberg; Vivek Subbiah
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-10-13

3.  [Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach and precursor lesions].

Authors:  E Wardelmann; W Hartmann; M Trautmann; J Sperveslage; S Elges; E Hekeler; S Huss
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 4.  Perspectives on the evolving state of the art management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours.

Authors:  Zoltan Szucs; Robin L Jones
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-04-26

5.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the adrenal gland:a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Hussam Abou Al-Shaar; Shrouq Solimanie; Ayman Azzam; Tarek Amin; Ahmed Abu-Zaid
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.943

Review 6.  New treatment strategies for advanced-stage gastrointestinal stromal tumours.

Authors:  Lillian R Klug; Homma M Khosroyani; Jason D Kent; Michael C Heinrich
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  HAND1 and BARX1 Act as Transcriptional and Anatomic Determinants of Malignancy in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.

Authors:  Matthew L Hemming; Shannon Coy; Jia-Ren Lin; Jessica L Andersen; Joanna Przybyl; Emanuele Mazzola; Amr H Abdelhamid Ahmed; Matt van de Rijn; Peter K Sorger; Scott A Armstrong; George D Demetri; Sandro Santagata
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 13.801

8.  Massively parallel sequencing fails to detect minor resistant subclones in tissue samples prior to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

Authors:  Carina Heydt; Niklas Kumm; Jana Fassunke; Helen Künstlinger; Michaela Angelika Ihle; Andreas Scheel; Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus; Florian Haller; Reinhard Büttner; Margarete Odenthal; Eva Wardelmann; Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  A meta-analysis of prognostic value of KIT mutation status in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Jiang; Jian Zhang; Zhi Li; Yingjun Liu; Daohai Wang; Guangsen Han
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 10.  Clinicopathological significance of c-KIT mutation in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lin Yan; Lei Zou; Wenhua Zhao; Yansen Wang; Bo Liu; Hongliang Yao; Haihua Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.