AIM OF THE STUDY: This study aims to evaluate cell-free DNA (CFDNA) concentration and integrity in patients with malignant and nonmalignant diseases and in controls to investigate their value as a screening test for cancer, and to correlate them with clinicopathological parameters of cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included three groups; group I: 120 cancer patients, group II: 120 patients with benign diseases and group III: 120 normal healthy volunteers as control. One plasma sample was collected from each subject. CFDNA was purified from the plasma then its concentration was measured and integrity was assessed by PCR amplification of 100, 200, 400, and 800 bp bands. RESULTS: There was a highly significant difference in CFDNA levels between cancer group and each of benign and control groups. AUC of ROC curve for cancer group versus normal and benign groups were 0.962 and 0.895, which indicated the efficiency of CFDNA as a marker of cancer. As for integrity, normal and benign subjects showed only two bands at 100 and 200 bp, while all cancer patients demonstrated the 400 bp band and 78% of them had the 800 bp whose presence correlated with vascular invasion. CONCLUSION: The combined use of CFDNA concentration and integrity is a candidate for a universal screening test of cancer. Upon setting suitable boundaries for the test it might be applied to identify cancer patients, particularly among subjects with predisposing factors. Being less expensive, CFDNA concentration could be applied for mass screening and for patients with values overlapping those of normal and benign subjects, the use of the more expensive, yet more specific, integrity test is suggested.
AIM OF THE STUDY: This study aims to evaluate cell-free DNA (CFDNA) concentration and integrity in patients with malignant and nonmalignant diseases and in controls to investigate their value as a screening test for cancer, and to correlate them with clinicopathological parameters of cancerpatients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included three groups; group I: 120 cancerpatients, group II: 120 patients with benign diseases and group III: 120 normal healthy volunteers as control. One plasma sample was collected from each subject. CFDNA was purified from the plasma then its concentration was measured and integrity was assessed by PCR amplification of 100, 200, 400, and 800 bp bands. RESULTS: There was a highly significant difference in CFDNA levels between cancer group and each of benign and control groups. AUC of ROC curve for cancer group versus normal and benign groups were 0.962 and 0.895, which indicated the efficiency of CFDNA as a marker of cancer. As for integrity, normal and benign subjects showed only two bands at 100 and 200 bp, while all cancerpatients demonstrated the 400 bp band and 78% of them had the 800 bp whose presence correlated with vascular invasion. CONCLUSION: The combined use of CFDNA concentration and integrity is a candidate for a universal screening test of cancer. Upon setting suitable boundaries for the test it might be applied to identify cancerpatients, particularly among subjects with predisposing factors. Being less expensive, CFDNA concentration could be applied for mass screening and for patients with values overlapping those of normal and benign subjects, the use of the more expensive, yet more specific, integrity test is suggested.
Authors: Ian A Cree; Lesley Uttley; Helen Buckley Woods; Hugh Kikuchi; Anne Reiman; Susan Harnan; Becky L Whiteman; Sian Taylor Philips; Michael Messenger; Angela Cox; Dawn Teare; Orla Sheils; Jacqui Shaw Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Nicholas Eastley; Aurore Sommer; Barbara Ottolini; Rita Neumann; Jin-Li Luo; Robert K Hastings; Thomas McCulloch; Claire P Esler; Jacqueline A Shaw; Robert U Ashford; Nicola J Royle Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Svetlana V Kostyuk; Lev N Porokhovnik; Elizaveta S Ershova; Elena M Malinovskaya; Marina S Konkova; Larisa V Kameneva; Olga A Dolgikh; Vladimir P Veiko; Vladimir M Pisarev; Andrew V Martynov; Vasilina A Sergeeva; Andrew A Kaliyanov; Anton D Filev; Julia M Chudakova; Margarita S Abramova; Serguey I Kutsev; Vera L Izhevskaya; Nataliya N Veiko Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 6.543