Literature DB >> 24060990

The spinal reflex cannot be perceptually separated from voluntary movements.

Arko Ghosh1, Patrick Haggard.   

Abstract

Both voluntary and involuntary movements activate sensors in the muscles, skin, tendon and joints. As limb movement can result from a mixture of spinal reflexes and voluntary motor commands, the cortical centres underlying conscious proprioception might either aggregate or separate the sensory inputs generated by voluntary movements from those generated by involuntary movements such as spinal reflexes. We addressed whether healthy volunteers could perceive the contribution of a spinal reflex during movements that combined both reflexive and voluntary contributions. Volunteers reported the reflexive contribution in leg movements that were partly driven by the knee-jerk reflex induced by a patellar tendon tap and partly by voluntary motor control. In one condition, participants were instructed to kick back in response to a tendon tap. The results were compared to reflexes in a resting baseline condition without voluntary movement. In a further condition, participants were instructed to kick forwards after a tap. Volunteers reported the perceived reflex contribution by repositioning the leg to the perceived maximum displacement to which the reflex moved the leg after each tendon tap. In the resting baseline condition, the reflex was accurately perceived. We found a near-unity slope of linear regressions of perceived on actual reflexive displacement. Both the slope value and the quality of regression fit in individual volunteers were significantly reduced when volunteers were instructed to generate voluntary backward kicks as soon as they detected the tap. In the kick forward condition, kinematic analysis showed continuity of reflex and voluntary movements, but the reflex contribution could be estimated from electromyography (EMG) recording on each trial. Again, participants' judgements of reflexes showed a poor relation to reflex EMG, in contrast to the baseline condition. In sum, we show that reflexes can be accurately perceived from afferent information. However, the presence of voluntary movement significantly impairs reflex perception. We suggest that perceptual separation between voluntary and reflex movement is poor at best. Our results imply that the brain has no clear marker for perceptually separating voluntary and involuntary movement. Attribution of body movement to voluntary or involuntary motor commands is surprisingly poor when both are present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24060990      PMCID: PMC3903356          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.260588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  39 in total

1.  Excitability of human gastrocnemius motor neurones at the time of the knee jerk.

Authors:  W C Hamann; J G Morris
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Inhibition of cortical evoked potentials and sensation by self-initiated movement in man.

Authors:  D Papakostopoulos; R Cooper; H J Crow
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Muscular sense is attenuated when humans move.

Authors:  D F Collins; T Cameron; D M Gillard; A Prochazka
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Gating of sensory input at spinal and cortical levels during preparation and execution of voluntary movement.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Seki; Eberhard E Fetz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Knowledge of motor commands and the recruitment of human motoneurons.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  The responses of Golgi tendon organs to stimulation of different combinations of motor units.

Authors:  J E Gregory; U Proske
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Detections of movements imposed on finger, elbow and shoulder joints.

Authors:  L A Hall; D I McCloskey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Automatic and "voluntary' responses compensating for disturbances of human thumb movements.

Authors:  J C Rothwell; M M Traub; C D Marsden
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-09-23       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  The responses of muscle spindles to small, slow movements in passive muscle and during fusimotor activity.

Authors:  A K Wise; J E Gregory; U Proske
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1999-03-06       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  A network centered on ventral premotor cortex exerts both facilitatory and inhibitory control over primary motor cortex during action reprogramming.

Authors:  Ethan R Buch; Rogier B Mars; Erie D Boorman; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sensorimotor organization of a sustained involuntary movement.

Authors:  Jack De Havas; Arko Ghosh; Hiroaki Gomi; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 2.  Experimental investigations of control principles of involuntary movement: a comprehensive review of the Kohnstamm phenomenon.

Authors:  Jack De Havas; Hiroaki Gomi; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 1.972

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.