Yeong-Joon Park1, Yo-Han Song, Ji-Hae An, Ho-Jun Song, Kenneth J Anusavice. 1. Department of Dental Materials and MRC for Biomineralization Disorders, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 500-757, South Korea. Electronic address: yjpark@jnu.ac.kr.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to evaluate the biocompatibility of nine types of pure metal ingots (Ag, Al, Cr, Cu, Mn, Mo, Nb, V, Zr) and 36 experimental titanium (Ti) alloys containing 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt% of each alloying element. METHODS: The cell viabilities for each test group were compared with that of CP-Ti using the WST-1 test and agar overlay test. RESULTS: The ranking of pure metal cytotoxicity from most potent to least potent was as follows: Cu>Al>Ag>V>Mn>Cr>Zr>Nb>Mo>CP-Ti. The mean cell viabilities for pure Cu, Al, Ag, V, and Mn were 21.6%, 25.3%, 31.7%, 31.7%, and 32.7%, respectively, which were significantly lower than that for the control group (p<0.05). The mean cell viabilities for pure Zr and Cr were 74.1% and 60.6%, respectively (p<0.05). Pure Mo and Nb demonstrated good biocompatibility with mean cell viabilities of 93.3% and 93.0%, respectively. The mean cell viabilities for all the Ti-based alloy groups were higher than 80% except for Ti-20 Nb (79.6%) and Ti-10 V (66.9%). The Ti-10 Nb alloy exhibited the highest cell viability (124.8%), which was higher than that of CP-Ti. Based on agar overlay test, pure Ag, Cr, Cu, Mn, and V were ranked as 'moderately cytotoxic', whereas the rest of the tested pure metals and all Ti alloys, except Ti-10 V (mild cytotoxicity), were ranked as 'noncytotoxic'. SIGNIFICANCE: The results obtained in this study can serve as a guide for the development of new Ti-based alloy implant systems.
OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to evaluate the biocompatibility of nine types of pure metal ingots (Ag, Al, Cr, Cu, Mn, Mo, Nb, V, Zr) and 36 experimental titanium (Ti) alloys containing 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt% of each alloying element. METHODS: The cell viabilities for each test group were compared with that of CP-Ti using the WST-1 test and agar overlay test. RESULTS: The ranking of pure metalcytotoxicity from most potent to least potent was as follows: Cu>Al>Ag>V>Mn>Cr>Zr>Nb>Mo>CP-Ti. The mean cell viabilities for pure Cu, Al, Ag, V, and Mn were 21.6%, 25.3%, 31.7%, 31.7%, and 32.7%, respectively, which were significantly lower than that for the control group (p<0.05). The mean cell viabilities for pure Zr and Cr were 74.1% and 60.6%, respectively (p<0.05). Pure Mo and Nb demonstrated good biocompatibility with mean cell viabilities of 93.3% and 93.0%, respectively. The mean cell viabilities for all the Ti-based alloy groups were higher than 80% except for Ti-20 Nb (79.6%) and Ti-10 V (66.9%). The Ti-10 Nb alloy exhibited the highest cell viability (124.8%), which was higher than that of CP-Ti. Based on agar overlay test, pure Ag, Cr, Cu, Mn, and V were ranked as 'moderately cytotoxic', whereas the rest of the tested pure metals and all Ti alloys, except Ti-10 V (mild cytotoxicity), were ranked as 'noncytotoxic'. SIGNIFICANCE: The results obtained in this study can serve as a guide for the development of new Ti-based alloy implant systems.
Authors: Galit H Frydman; Robert P Marini; Vasudevan Bakthavatchalu; Kathleen E Biddle; Sureshkumar Muthupalani; Charles R Vanderburg; Barry Lai; Pavan K Bendapudi; Ronald G Tompkins; James G Fox Journal: Comp Med Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 0.982
Authors: Pedro Akira Bazaglia Kuroda; Fernanda de Freitas Quadros; Karolyne Dos Santos Jorge Sousa; Tatiani Ayako Goto Donato; Raul Oliveira de Araújo; Carlos Roberto Grandini Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2020-01-21 Impact factor: 3.896
Authors: Margarita A Khimich; Konstantin A Prosolov; Tatiana Mishurova; Sergei Evsevleev; Xavier Monforte; Andreas H Teuschl; Paul Slezak; Egor A Ibragimov; Alexander A Saprykin; Zhanna G Kovalevskaya; Andrey I Dmitriev; Giovanni Bruno; Yurii P Sharkeev Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 5.076
Authors: Renata Falchete do Prado; Gabriela Campos Esteves; Evelyn Luzia De Souza Santos; Daiane Acácia Griti Bueno; Carlos Alberto Alves Cairo; Luis Gustavo Oliveira De Vasconcellos; Renata Silveira Sagnori; Fernanda Bastos Pereira Tessarin; Felipe Eduardo Oliveira; Luciane Dias De Oliveira; Maria Fernanda Lima Villaça-Carvalho; Vinicius André Rodrigues Henriques; Yasmin Rodarte Carvalho; Luana Marotta Reis De Vasconcellos Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mark E Gray; James Meehan; Ewen O Blair; Carol Ward; Simon P Langdon; Linda R Morrison; Jamie R K Marland; Andreas Tsiamis; Ian H Kunkler; Alan Murray; David Argyle Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2018-10-27 Impact factor: 3.368
Authors: Davide Farronato; Pietro Mario Pasini; Andrea Alain Orsina; Mattia Manfredini; Lorenzo Azzi; Marco Farronato Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2020-01-21 Impact factor: 3.623