AIM: EGFR and HPV-associated p16 are among the most investigated biomarkers in head and neck cancer. The aim was to investigate the correlation and interaction between these two markers and to evaluate their potential prognostic significance when combined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 336 Oropharyngeal carcinomas treated with primary radiotherapy (66-68 Gy, 2fx/day, 10-12 Gy/week) and with known EGFR/p16-status estimated semiquantitatively by immunohistochemistry were included in the study. Data were evaluated by EGFR-expression (high/low) and p16-status (positive/negative) consequently dividing tumours into four groups by combination of the biomarkers. Patient/tumour characteristics and complete 5-year follow-up were available. RESULTS: Low EGFR-expression was significantly more common in p16-positive tumours compared to p16-negative, p < 0.0001. p16 positivity showed a strong prognostic impact (p < 0.0001, HR = 0.22 [0.13-0.38]), whereas EGFR was a weak prognostic marker when local control was used as endpoint (p = 0.03, HR = 0.53 [0.29-0.94]). Combination of EGFR/p16 did not add significant information to p16 alone and by multivariable analysis only p16 showed significant prognostic information for all evaluated endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Both EGFR and p16 bear prognostic information in oropharyngeal cancer, although p16 is, by far, the strongest prognostic factor. The markers seem to be correlated and this might have influence when evaluating the effect of EGFR inhibition in oropharyngeal tumours.
AIM: EGFR and HPV-associated p16 are among the most investigated biomarkers in head and neck cancer. The aim was to investigate the correlation and interaction between these two markers and to evaluate their potential prognostic significance when combined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 336 Oropharyngeal carcinomas treated with primary radiotherapy (66-68 Gy, 2fx/day, 10-12 Gy/week) and with known EGFR/p16-status estimated semiquantitatively by immunohistochemistry were included in the study. Data were evaluated by EGFR-expression (high/low) and p16-status (positive/negative) consequently dividing tumours into four groups by combination of the biomarkers. Patient/tumour characteristics and complete 5-year follow-up were available. RESULTS: Low EGFR-expression was significantly more common in p16-positive tumours compared to p16-negative, p < 0.0001. p16 positivity showed a strong prognostic impact (p < 0.0001, HR = 0.22 [0.13-0.38]), whereas EGFR was a weak prognostic marker when local control was used as endpoint (p = 0.03, HR = 0.53 [0.29-0.94]). Combination of EGFR/p16 did not add significant information to p16 alone and by multivariable analysis only p16 showed significant prognostic information for all evaluated endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Both EGFR and p16 bear prognostic information in oropharyngeal cancer, although p16 is, by far, the strongest prognostic factor. The markers seem to be correlated and this might have influence when evaluating the effect of EGFR inhibition in oropharyngeal tumours.
Authors: Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause; Jens Overgaard; Jürgen Debus; Søren M Bentzen; Juliane Daartz; Christian Richter; Daniel Zips; Thomas Bortfeld Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2016-03-18 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Arash O Naghavi; Michelle I Echevarria; G Daniel Grass; Tobin J Strom; Yazan A Abuodeh; Kamran A Ahmed; Youngchul Kim; Andy M Trotti; Louis B Harrison; Kosj Yamoah; Jimmy J Caudell Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Eva-Leonne Göttgens; Christian Ostheimer; Paul N Span; Jan Bussink; Ester M Hammond Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Robbie Woods; Esther M O'Regan; Susan Kennedy; Cara Martin; John J O'Leary; Conrad Timon Journal: World J Clin Cases Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 1.337