Literature DB >> 24059563

Retrieval practice with short-answer, multiple-choice, and hybrid tests.

Megan A Smith1, Jeffrey D Karpicke.   

Abstract

Retrieval practice improves meaningful learning, and the most frequent way of implementing retrieval practice in classrooms is to have students answer questions. In four experiments (N=372) we investigated the effects of different question formats on learning. Students read educational texts and practised retrieval by answering short-answer, multiple-choice, or hybrid questions. In hybrid conditions students first attempted to recall answers in short-answer format, then identified answers in multiple-choice format. We measured learning 1 week later using a final assessment with two types of questions: those that could be answered by recalling information verbatim from the texts and those that required inferences. Practising retrieval in all format conditions enhanced retention, relative to a study-only control condition, on both verbatim and inference questions. However, there were little or no advantages of answering short-answer or hybrid format questions over multiple-choice questions in three experiments. In Experiment 4, when retrieval success was improved under initial short-answer conditions, there was an advantage of answering short-answer or hybrid questions over multiple-choice questions. The results challenge the simple conclusion that short-answer questions always produce the best learning, due to increased retrieval effort or difficulty, and demonstrate the importance of retrieval success for retrieval-based learning activities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Learning; Multiple-choice; Question format; Retrieval practice; Short-answer; Testing effect

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24059563     DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2013.831454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  7 in total

1.  Retrieval practice in the form of online homework improved information retention more when spaced 5 days rather than 1 day after class in two physiology courses.

Authors:  Caitlin N Cadaret; Dustin T Yates
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  Test-enhanced learning: the potential for testing to promote greater learning in undergraduate science courses.

Authors:  Cynthia J Brame; Rachel Biel
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Promoting an active form of learning out-of-class via answering online "study questions" leads to higher than expected exam scores in General Biology.

Authors:  Susan I Gibson
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Participation in Voluntary Re-quizzing Is Predictive of Increased Performance on Cumulative Assessments in Introductory Biology.

Authors:  Elise M Walck-Shannon; Michael J Cahill; Mark A McDaniel; Regina F Frey
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Support for learning under naturalistic conditions.

Authors:  Lucy M Cronin-Golomb; Patricia J Bauer
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-09-24

6.  Human-robot interaction methodology: Robot teaching activity.

Authors:  Anna-Maria Velentza; Nikolaos Fachantidis; Ioannis Lefkos
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2022-09-21

Review 7.  Teaching the science of learning.

Authors:  Yana Weinstein; Christopher R Madan; Megan A Sumeracki
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-01-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.