| Literature DB >> 24058892 |
E Prasetio, A Sudianto, M Rozik, R Nurdiyani, E Sanusi, H Nursyam, F Fariedah.
Abstract
The Outer Membrane Protein (OMP) of Vibrio alginolyticus cell wall was administered intramuscularly (IM) to the tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon Fab.) at 10, 20, 30 μg/kg bw. After 14 days infection, the tiger shrimps were challenged with 10(7) bacterial density of Vibrio harveyi for 24 hours. The total haemocyte count (THC), differential haemocyte count (DHC) and amount of total protein plasma (TPP), superoxide dismutase and protease enzyme activity were monitored. The results showed that intramuscular administration of OMP enhanced an immunomodulatory effect and protection against V. harveyi. The beneficial effect of OMP on the tiger shrimp is dose-dependent and OMP-20 μg/kg bw is an optimal dose after two times of boosters for 14 days against V. harveyi infection.Entities:
Keywords: Immunomodulation; Outer membrane protein; Tiger shrimp; Vibrio harveyi
Year: 2013 PMID: 24058892 PMCID: PMC3777020 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-432
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Figure 1Effects of different dosages of intramuscular administration of OMP on total haemocyte count (THC) of tiger shrimp (×10sel/mm) for fourteen days. Data are represented as mean ± S.D. (n = 10).
Figure 2Effects of different dosages of intramuscular administration of OMP andinfections on total haemocyte count (THC). Data are represented as mean ± S.D. (n = 10). It indicates significant differences (P < 0.05) among five treatments determined by one-way ANOVA.
Figure 3Effects of different dosages of intramuscular administration of OMP andinfections on differential haemocyte count (DHC). Data are represented as mean ± S.D. (n = 10). It indicates significant differences (P < 0.05) among five treatments determined by one-way ANOVA.
Figure 4The Effects of different dosages of intramuscular administration of OMP andinfections on total plasma protein (TPP). Data are represented as mean ± S.D. (n = 10). Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) among five treatments determined by one-way ANOVA.
Figure 5Effects of different dosages of intramuscular administration of OMP andinfections on superoxide dismutase (SOD) and protease activity. Data are represented as mean ± S.D. (n = 10). Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) among five treatments determined by one-way ANOVA. EA denote enzyme activity (U/mg protein).
Figure 6Cumulative mortality (%) of tiger shrimp after two times of boosters of OMP for 14 days againstinfection for 24 hours.