| Literature DB >> 24058564 |
Dirk Hoyer1, Florian Tetschke, Susan Jaekel, Samuel Nowack, Otto W Witte, Ekkehard Schleußner, Uwe Schneider.
Abstract
Fetal brain development involves the development of the neuro-vegetative (autonomic) control that is mediated by the autonomic nervous system (ANS). Disturbances of the fetal brain development have implications for diseases in later postnatal life. In that context, the fetal functional brain age can be altered. Universal principles of developmental biology applied to patterns of autonomic control may allow a functional age assessment. The work aims at the development of a fetal autonomic brain age score (fABAS) based on heart rate patterns. We analysed n = 113 recordings in quiet sleep, n = 286 in active sleep, and n = 29 in active awakeness from normals. We estimated fABAS from magnetocardiographic recordings (21.4-40.3 weeks of gestation) preclassified in quiet sleep (n = 113, 63 females) and active sleep (n = 286, 145 females) state by cross-validated multivariate linear regression models in a cross-sectional study. According to universal system developmental principles, we included indices that address increasing fluctuation range, increasing complexity, and pattern formation (skewness, power spectral ratio VLF/LF, pNN5). The resulting models constituted fABAS. fABAS explained 66/63% (coefficient of determination R(2) of training and validation set) of the variance by age in quiet, while 51/50% in active sleep. By means of a logistic regression model using fluctuation range and fetal age, quiet and active sleep were automatically reclassified (94.3/93.1% correct classifications). We did not find relevant gender differences. We conclude that functional brain age can be assessed based on universal developmental indices obtained from autonomic control patterns. fABAS reflect normal complex functional brain maturation. The presented normative data are supplemented by an explorative study of 19 fetuses compromised by intrauterine growth restriction. We observed a shift in the state distribution towards active awakeness. The lower WGA dependent fABAS values found in active sleep may reflect alterations in the universal developmental indices, namely fluctuation amplitude, complexity, and pattern formation that constitute fABAS.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24058564 PMCID: PMC3776847 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074431
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Neonatal outcome characteristics, mean (standard deviation), [min-max].
| Normal | IUGR | |
| age of birth (WGA) | 39.6 (1.6), [31–42] | 35.6 (3.3), [26.4–39.6] |
| weight of birth (g) | 3438 (503), [1460–4700] | 1945 (703), [480–3220] |
| APGAR score after 5 min | 9.1 (1.1), | 8.1 (1.6), |
| ph value of umbilical cord blood | 7.25 (0.08), [6.97–7.47] | 7.30 (0.06), [7.13–7.37] |
Heart rate variability indices.
| Parameter | Calculation | Interpretation |
| Increasing fluctuation amplitude | ||
| amplitude | 20–95 inter-quantile distance of detrended NN intervalseries | Fluctuation range of heart beat intervals above an approximated baseline |
| Increasing complexity | ||
| gMSE(3) | Generalized Mutual Information at coarse graining level 3of NN interval series | Complexity of heart rate patterns essentially modulated by complex sympatho-vagal rhythms |
| Pattern formation | ||
| skewness | Skewness of NN interval series | Asymmetry, contribution of vagal and sympathetic activity with their different time constants, decline of decelerations and formation of acceleration patterns |
| pNN5 | Percentage of differences between adjacent NN intervalsthat are >5 ms. | Formation of vagal rhythms |
| VLF/LF | Ratio between very low (0.02–0.08 Hz) and low(0.08–0.2 Hz) Frequency band power | Baseline fluctuation in relation to sympatho-vagal modulations |
| Traditional fetal heart rate indices | ||
| meanHR | Average over all NN interval related values of 60,000/NN | Mean heart rate in bpm |
Univariate predictors and multivariate regression model in quiet state.
| Parameter | R2 | beta | Slope (95% CI) | p-value |
|
| ||||
| amplitude | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.29 (−0.04, 0.63) | 0.087 |
| gMSE3 | 0.54 | 0.73 | 39.90 (33.00, 46.85) | <0.001 |
| skewness | 0.20 | 0.44 | 2.06 (1.27, 2,85) | <0.001 |
| pNN5 | 0.34 | 0.58 | 21.33 (15.73, 26.94) | <0.001 |
| VLF/LF | 0.23 | −0.52 | −1.15 (−1.50, −0.79) | <0.001 |
| meanHR | 0.16 | −0.41 | −0.22 (−0.31, −0.12) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| gMSE3 | 0.66/0.63 | 0.46 | 24.88 (16.72, 33.03) | <0.001 |
| skewness | 0.24 | 1.13 (0.56, 1.71) | <0.001 | |
| VLF/LF | −0.26 | −0.56 (−0.84, −0.28) | <0.001 | |
| pNN5 | 0.14 | 5.16 (−0.08, 10.39) | 0.054 | |
Coefficient of determination R2 (training set/validation set in the multivariate model), standardized regression coefficient beta, slope (95% confidence interval) of the models, significance.
pNN5 was included only in the backward modeling.
Univariate predictors and multivariate regression model in active state.
| Parameter | R2 | beta | Slope (95% CI) | p-value |
|
| ||||
| amplitude | 0.34 | 0.57 | 0.41 (0.34, 0.48) | <0.001 |
| gMSE3 | 0.05 | 0.23 | 12.84 (6.50, 19.18) | <0.001 |
| skewness | 0.35 | 0.59 | 4.01 (3.37, 4,65) | <0.001 |
| pNN5 | 0.23 | 0.48 | 17.03 (135.36, 20.69) | <0.001 |
| VLF/LF | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.03 (−0.19, 0.26) | 0.766 |
| meanHR | 0.04 | −0.21 | −0.11 (−0.17, −0.05) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| amplitude | 0.51/0.50 | 0.37 | 0.27 (0.18, 0.35) | <0.001 |
| gMSE3 | 0.22 | 12.29 (5.70, 18.88) | <0.001 | |
| skewness | 0.33 | 2.27 (1.59, 2.95) | <0.001 | |
| pNN5 | 0.11 | 3.76 (−0.59, 8.11) | 0.090 | |
| VLF/LF | 0.12 | 0.23 (0.05, 0.40) | 0.012 | |
Coefficient of determination R2 (training set/validation set in the multivariate model), standardized regression coefficient beta, slope (95% confidence interval) of the models, significance.
Figure 1Fetal autonomic brain age score (fABAS) versus chronological age in quiet sleep of females ○ and males •.
For gender comparison see Table 5.
Figure 2Fetal autonomic brain age score (fABAS) versus chronological age in active sleep of females ○ and males •.
For gender comparison see Table 5.
Contribution of WGA and sex to the variance of fABAS (ANOVA models).
| source | Sum of squares | df | F | p-value |
|
| ||||
| WGA | 736.34 | 1 | 197.47 | <0.001 |
| sex | 29.31 | 1 | 2.96 | 0.006 |
| total | 1164.75 | 103 | ||
|
| ||||
| WGA | 1073.1 | 1 | 289.02 | <0.001 |
| sex | 4.17 | 1 | 1.123 | 0.290 |
| total | 2082.45 | 272 |
State classification results of logistic regression models.
| Training set | Validation set | |||||
| quiet | active | Overall(%) | quiet | active | Overall(%) | |
| amplitude | 93.0 | 91.3 | 91.6 | 93.9 | 90.7 | 92.3 |
| amplitude+WGA | 94.7 | 94.1 | 94.4 | 93.7 | 92.4 | 93.1 |
Figure 3Fetal autonomic brain age score (fABAS) vs. chronological age in active sleep.
Normals ○, intrauterine growth retarded (IUGR) group •. For group comparison see Table 7.
Discrimination of IUGR and normal group by means of bivariate logistic regression models that include [fABAS, WGA] and [meanHR, WGA], respectively.
| Measure | B | SE | Wald | p-value | OR (95% CI) | correct classifications |
| WGA | 0.85 | 0.08 | 126 | <0.001 | 2.34 (2.02, 2.72) | |
| fABAS | −1.37 | 0.12 | 135 | <0.001 | 0.26 (0.20, 0.32) | |
| 82.3% | ||||||
| WGA | 0.29 | 0.03 | 76 | <0.001 | 1.34 (1.23, 1.43) | |
| meanHR | 0.14 | 0.02 | 75 | <0.001 | 1.15 (1.11, 1.18) | |
| 71.5% |
Regression coefficient B, standard error SE, Wald test statistic with significance level p, odds ratio OR (95% confidence interval), correct classification rate.
Figure 4Mean heart rate (meanHR) vs. chronological age in active sleep.
Normals ○, intrauterine growth retarded (IUGR) group •. For group comparison see Table 7.