Literature DB >> 24057690

Standardized templates for shaping the fibula free flap in mandible reconstruction.

Evan Matros1, Eric Santamaria, Peter G Cordeiro.   

Abstract

Conversion of the straight fibula bone flap into the parabolic mandible shape can be performed using customized acrylic templates made from a 1:1 mandible computed tomography scan and lateral cephalogram. The premise of the current study is to objectively quantify the variability in a series of acrylic templates used for mandible reconstruction to assess the feasibility of creating a standardized template.In this study acrylic templates of 48 consecutive adult dentate patients who underwent fibula flap mandible reconstruction from 1994 to 1999 were evaluated. Osteotomy angles for the mandibular angle, midbody and parasymphysis, and length of each bony segment were determined using a metric ruler and protractor. Values were reported as means ± standard deviation.The mean mandibular angle measured 122.6 ± 6.4 degrees, while the midbody and parasymphysis angles were 153 ± 4.5 degrees and 130 ± 4.2 degrees, respectively. Mean bone segment lengths were: ramus 64.5 ± 9.8 mm, distal body 47.6 ± 4.2 mm, mesial body 40.6 ± 3.2 mm, and symphysis 18.5 ± 2.2 mm.It was concluded that the evaluation of patient acrylic templates used in a series of mandible reconstructions demonstrates osteotomy angles vary minimally (3-5%). Bone segment lengths vary from 10 to 15%, suggesting heterogeneity in mandible size. A standard template can be used to shape the fibula in most mandible reconstructions eliminating the need for routine preoperative imaging or costly fabricated computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing cutting guides. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24057690     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1356645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg        ISSN: 0743-684X            Impact factor:   2.873


  7 in total

1.  A Virtual Surgical Planning Algorithm for Delayed Maxillomandibular Reconstruction.

Authors:  John T Stranix; Carrie S Stern; Michael Rensberger; Ian Ganly; Jay O Boyle; Robert J Allen; Joseph J Disa; Babak J Mehrara; Evan S Garfein; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Comparison of Mechanical Stability between Fibular Free Flap Reconstruction versus Locking Mandibular Reconstruction Plate Fixation.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Chung; Eul-Sik Yoon; Seung-Ha Park; Byung-Il Lee; Hyon-Surk Kim; Hi-Jin You
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2014-08-14

3.  Balsa wood for precise intra-operative bone contouring in fibula free-flap mandible reconstruction.

Authors:  Gilad Horowitz; Anton Warshavsky; Or Fridman; Ravit Yanko; Vadik Raiser; Eyal Gur; Dan M Fliss; Arik Zaretski
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Virtual Surgical Planning for Oncologic Mandibular and Maxillary Reconstruction.

Authors:  Paige L Myers; Jonas A Nelson; Evan B Rosen; Robert J Allen; Joseph J Disa; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-09-17

5.  Precision of fibula positioning guide in mandibular reconstruction with a fibula graft.

Authors:  Se-Ho Lim; Moon-Key Kim; Sang-Hoon Kang
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 2.151

6.  Innovation in the planning of V-Y rotation advancement flaps: A template for flap design.

Authors:  Utku Can Dölen; Uğur Koçer
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2017-10-27

7.  Surgical benefit of mandibular morphometric analysis: A new tool to standardize mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Alice Prevost; Franck Delanoe; Zoé Cavallier; Samuel Muller; Raphael Lopez; Frédéric Lauwers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.