Literature DB >> 2405769

Ecology and management of arthropod pests of poultry.

R C Axtell1, J J Arends.   

Abstract

The worldwide spread of modern, high-density confined poultry production systems under the direction of integrators has intensified the importance of a select number of arthropod ectoparasites and habitat pests. This concentrated production of poultry provides artificial ecosystems that are sometimes ideal for the development of large populations of arthropod pests. At the same time the systems are amenable to integrated pest management involving a multipest and multimethod approach to reducing or eliminating arthropod pests. Since rodents are major pests, they should be included in an integrated pest management program to make the program most cost-effective and attractive to the integrators and producers (5). Quantitative data are scarce on economic effects, and the concept of economic thresholds is difficult to apply either to ectoparasites or to habitat pests. The risk of transporting ectoparasites among flocks is difficult to evaluate and necessitates treatment after early detection of the arthropods. Flies and litter beetles present a threat of disease transmission and the potential for lawsuits from neighbors or public health agencies that are factors not subject to easy cost estimates. The monetary losses of a flock devastated by disease or a farm forced to close are so great that the risks are unacceptable. Production losses from lowered feed conversion ratios and insulation damage are likely to be detected by the sophisticated record-keeping of the integrators. Minimal use of pesticides and other chemicals on poultry and in poultry housing is an objective of the integrators and, consequently, an integrated pest management (IPM) approach that reduces the need for pesticides is attractive. The key to further development of effective arthropod management programs for poultry is the implementation of pest and disease monitoring programs for the complete system. Improvements in arthropod sampling methods and more attention to monitoring the biosecurity systems to minimize ectoparasite dispersal are needed. The integrators have servicemen who regularly visit the production facilities and can be trained to perform monitoring functions and to instigate and supervise integrated pest management measures. With the increasing use of computers by the integrators, the prospects for utilizing the monitoring data in predictive computer simulation models for pest management decision-making justify more efforts to develop such tools (64, 102, 168). Future poultry pest management programs must be based on sound data, which presently is too limited, and must be flexible enough to adjust rapidly to evolving pest problems in rapidly changing production systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2405769     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.en.35.010190.000533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol        ISSN: 0066-4170            Impact factor:   19.686


  37 in total

Review 1.  The Evolution and Ecology of Resistance in Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Robert Gatenby; Joel Brown
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 6.915

2.  Feeding deterrent activity of synthesized silver nanoparticles using Manilkara zapota leaf extract against the house fly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae).

Authors:  Chinnaperumal Kamaraj; Govindasamy Rajakumar; Abdul Abdul Rahuman; Kanayairam Velayutham; Asokan Bagavan; Abdul Abduz Zahir; Gandhi Elango
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Comparison of ingestion and topical application of insecticides against the common bed bug, Cimex lectularius (Hemiptera: Cimicidae).

Authors:  Angela Sierras; Coby Schal
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 4.845

4.  Acaricidal and repellent effects of Cnidium officinale-derived material against Dermanyssus gallinae (Acari: Dermanyssidae).

Authors:  Hyun Kyung Kim; Seung Ju Lee; Bang-Yeon Hwang; Jong Ung Yoon; Gil-Hah Kim
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  Candidate predators for biological control of the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae.

Authors:  Izabela Lesna; Peter Wolfs; Farid Faraji; Lise Roy; Jan Komdeur; Maurice W Sabelis
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 2.132

6.  Susceptibilities of northern fowl mite, Ornithonyssus sylviarum (Acarina: Macronyssidae), and chicken mite, Dermanyssus gallinae (Acarina: Dermanyssidae), to selected acaricides.

Authors:  M G Fletcher; R C Axtell
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.132

7.  Use of Beauveria bassiana to control northern fowl mites (Ornithonyssus sylviarum) on roosters in an agricultural research facility.

Authors:  Matthew S W Rassette; Elizabeth I Pierpont; Tina Wahl; Mark Berres
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 8.  Application of Evolutionary Principles to Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Pedro M Enriquez-Navas; Jonathan W Wojtkowiak; Robert A Gatenby
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Inert dusts and their effects on the poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae).

Authors:  Ole Kilpinen; Tove Steenberg
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 2.132

10.  Aggregation pheromone compounds of the black larder beetle Dermestes haemorrhoidalis Kuster (Coleoptera: Dermestidae).

Authors:  Rajasekhara Rao Korada; Frans C Griepink
Journal:  Chemoecology       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 1.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.