PURPOSE: In febrile neutropenia (FN), no reliable marker has been identified to discriminate between severe infection and other causes of fever early in the clinical course. Since lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) has proven to be an accurate biomarker of bacteremia/clinical sepsis in critically ill non-immunocompromised infants and children, we performed a prospective study to determine the diagnostic accuracy of LBP in children with FN. METHODS: Concentrations of LBP, procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were prospectively measured on two consecutive days in 90 FN episodes experienced by 47 children. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed for each biomarker to predict bacteremia/clinical sepsis and severe sepsis. RESULTS: Eighteen of the 90 episodes were classified as bacteremia/clinical sepsis. On both days 1 and 2, all biomarkers had a low to intermediate diagnostic accuracy for sepsis, and no significant differences were found between them (area under the curve (AUC) for LBP, 0.648 and 0.714; for PCT, 0.665 and 0.744; for IL-6, 0.775 and 0.775; and for CRP, 0.695 and 0.828). Comparison of their AUCs to the AUC of maximum body temperature on admission (AUC = 0.668) also failed to show any significant differences. In severe sepsis, however, the best diagnostic accuracies were found for IL-6 and PCT (AUC 0.892 and 0.752, respectively), and these were significantly higher than those for LBP (AUC 0.566) on admission. CONCLUSIONS: On admission and 24 h later, the LBP concentration is less accurate for predicting bacteremia/clinical sepsis compared to IL-6, PCT, and CRP.
PURPOSE: In febrile neutropenia (FN), no reliable marker has been identified to discriminate between severe infection and other causes of fever early in the clinical course. Since lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) has proven to be an accurate biomarker of bacteremia/clinical sepsis in critically ill non-immunocompromised infants and children, we performed a prospective study to determine the diagnostic accuracy of LBP in children with FN. METHODS: Concentrations of LBP, procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were prospectively measured on two consecutive days in 90 FN episodes experienced by 47 children. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed for each biomarker to predict bacteremia/clinical sepsis and severe sepsis. RESULTS: Eighteen of the 90 episodes were classified as bacteremia/clinical sepsis. On both days 1 and 2, all biomarkers had a low to intermediate diagnostic accuracy for sepsis, and no significant differences were found between them (area under the curve (AUC) for LBP, 0.648 and 0.714; for PCT, 0.665 and 0.744; for IL-6, 0.775 and 0.775; and for CRP, 0.695 and 0.828). Comparison of their AUCs to the AUC of maximum body temperature on admission (AUC = 0.668) also failed to show any significant differences. In severe sepsis, however, the best diagnostic accuracies were found for IL-6 and PCT (AUC 0.892 and 0.752, respectively), and these were significantly higher than those for LBP (AUC 0.566) on admission. CONCLUSIONS: On admission and 24 h later, the LBP concentration is less accurate for predicting bacteremia/clinical sepsis compared to IL-6, PCT, and CRP.
Authors: Mitchell M Levy; Mitchell P Fink; John C Marshall; Edward Abraham; Derek Angus; Deborah Cook; Jonathan Cohen; Steven M Opal; Jean-Louis Vincent; Graham Ramsay Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: M E Santolaya; A M Alvarez; A Becker; J Cofré; N Enríquez; M O'Ryan; E Payá; J Pilorget; C Salgado; J Tordecilla; M Varas; M Villarroel; T Viviani; M Zubieta Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-07-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ben De Pauw; Thomas J Walsh; J Peter Donnelly; David A Stevens; John E Edwards; Thierry Calandra; Peter G Pappas; Johan Maertens; Olivier Lortholary; Carol A Kauffman; David W Denning; Thomas F Patterson; Georg Maschmeyer; Jacques Bille; William E Dismukes; Raoul Herbrecht; William W Hope; Christopher C Kibbler; Bart Jan Kullberg; Kieren A Marr; Patricia Muñoz; Frank C Odds; John R Perfect; Angela Restrepo; Markus Ruhnke; Brahm H Segal; Jack D Sobel; Tania C Sorrell; Claudio Viscoli; John R Wingard; Theoklis Zaoutis; John E Bennett Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2008-06-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Luis García de Guadiana-Romualdo; Ignacio Español-Morales; Pablo Cerezuela-Fuentes; Luciano Consuegra-Sánchez; Ana Hernando-Holgado; Patricia Esteban-Torrella; Enrique Jiménez-Santos; Monserrat Viqueira-González; África de Béjar-Almira; María Dolores Albaladejo-Otón Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-01-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Zhongheng Zhang; Nathan J Smischney; Haibo Zhang; Sven Van Poucke; Panagiotis Tsirigotis; Jordi Rello; Patrick M Honore; Win Sen Kuan; Juliet June Ray; Jiancang Zhou; You Shang; Yuetian Yu; Christian Jung; Chiara Robba; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Pietro Caironi; David Grimaldi; Stefan Hofer; George Dimopoulos; Marc Leone; Sang-Bum Hong; Mabrouk Bahloul; Laurent Argaud; Won Young Kim; Herbert D Spapen; Jose Rodolfo Rocco Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Fabian J S van der Velden; Gabriella de Vries; Alexander Martin; Emma Lim; Ulrich von Both; Laura Kolberg; Enitan D Carrol; Aakash Khanijau; Jethro A Herberg; Tisham De; Rachel Galassini; Taco W Kuijpers; Federico Martinón-Torres; Irene Rivero-Calle; Clementien L Vermont; Nienke N Hagedoorn; Marko Pokorn; Andrew J Pollard; Luregn J Schlapbach; Maria Tsolia; Irini Elefhteriou; Shunmay Yeung; Dace Zavadska; Colin Fink; Marie Voice; Werner Zenz; Benno Kohlmaier; Philipp K A Agyeman; Effua Usuf; Fatou Secka; Ronald de Groot; Michael Levin; Michiel van der Flier; Marieke Emonts Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2022-10-15 Impact factor: 3.860
Authors: Charalampos Pierrakos; Dimitrios Velissaris; Max Bisdorff; John C Marshall; Jean-Louis Vincent Journal: Crit Care Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 9.097