Literature DB >> 24055940

High-density substrate-guided ventricular tachycardia ablation: role of activation mapping in an attempt to improve procedural effectiveness.

Corrado Carbucicchio1, Nadeem Ahmad Raja, Luigi Di Biase, Valeria Volpe, Antonio Dello Russo, Chintan Trivedi, Stefano Bartoletti, Martina Zucchetti, Michela Casella, Eleonora Russo, Pasquale Santangeli, Massimo Moltrasio, Fabrizio Tundo, Gaetano Fassini, Andrea Natale, Claudio Tondo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advanced techniques of electroanatomical mapping efficiently guide ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation strategies; in this context, the adjunctive value of combining activation mapping (AMap) to improve accuracy has not been elucidated.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether conventional AMap further contributes to the identification of critical sites of VT reentry and whether this translates into a more effective ablation outcome in a cohort of patients undergoing VT ablation.
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 126 patients (mean age 65.3 ± 10.5 years; left ventricular ejection fraction 33.3% ± 7.2%) with ischemic (n = 89) or idiopathic (n = 37) dilated cardiomyopathy undergoing endocardial (n = 105) or endo-epicardial (n = 21) electroanatomical mapping and ablation. A substrate-guided strategy targeting surrogate markers of reentry was accomplished in all patients, but the feasibility and efficacy of AMap was preliminarily assessed for all induced VTs focusing on early VT suppression obtained during radiofrequency delivery. VT-free survival was assessed by ICD interrogation.
RESULTS: AMap successfully guided ablation in 62 of 104 (59.6%) patients with inducible VT(s). At 1 year, 6 of 126 (4.8%) patients died; VT recurred in 28 of 126 (22.2%) patients. No significant difference in VT recurrence rate was observed between patients in whom AMap proved effective versus those in whom substrate-guided ablation was not corroborated by AMap (16 of 62 [25.8%] vs 12 of 64 [18.8%]; log-rank test, P = .3).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the efficacy of a substrate-guided strategy targeting specific markers of arrhythmogenicity identified during sinus rhythm. AMap proves highly efficient acutely but does not improve overall VT-free survival, suggesting that in patients with advanced cardiac disease, life-threatening arrhythmias can be successfully treated by ablation in sinus rhythm, thus limiting procedural risks.
© 2013 Heart Rhythm Society Published by Heart Rhythm Society All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AMap; Catheter ablation; EAM; EGM; EP; Electroanatomical mapping; ICD; ICM; IDCM; Ischemic heart disease; LV; Nonischemic cardiomyopathy; PES; RF; RV; VT; Ventricular tachycardia; activation mapping; electroanatomical mapping; electrogram; electrophysiology; idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy; implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; ischemic cardiomyopathy; left ventricle/ventricular; programmed electrical stimulation; radiofrequency; right ventricular; ventricular tachycardia

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24055940     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.09.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  4 in total

1.  2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Cardiac Electrophysiology Under MRI Guidance: an Emerging Technology.

Authors:  Henry Chubb; Steven E Williams; John Whitaker; James L Harrison; Reza Razavi; Mark O'Neill
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2017-06

3.  2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Sáenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 4.  Electrical storm: A clinical and electrophysiological overview.

Authors:  Sergio Conti; Salvatore Pala; Viviana Biagioli; Giuseppe Del Giorno; Martina Zucchetti; Eleonora Russo; Vittoria Marino; Antonio Dello Russo; Michela Casella; Francesca Pizzamiglio; Valentina Catto; Claudio Tondo; Corrado Carbucicchio
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.