AIMS: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) originates during childhood and adolescence. Schools are potentially effective settings for early public health prevention strategies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of six physical education (PE) lessons on children's CVD risk. METHODS: This longitudinal study in 10 public schools (1218 children, aged 6-13 years), 6 intervention and 4 control schools evaluates a natural experiment, where intervention schools tripled PE to six lessons per week compared to the mandatory two PE lessons in the control schools. Baseline (2008) and 2-year follow-up measures were anthropometrics, cardiorespiratory fitness, blood pressure and blood samples providing lipids and measures for insulin resistance. Based on these variables, a composite risk score was calculated and used for further analysis. Multivariate multilevel mixed effect regression models were used to estimate effect of intervention taking the hierarchical structure of data into account. Individual, class and school were considered random effects. Intra class correlation (ICC) was calculated. RESULTS: Intervention significantly lowered mean of composite risk score with 0.17 SD (95% CI: -0.34 to -0.01). Six PE lessons per week had a beneficial effect on triglycerides (TG) levels (-0.18 SD, 95% CI: -0.36 to 0.00), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (-0.22 SD, 95% CI: -0.42 to -0.02) and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (-0.17 SD, 95% CI: -0.34 to 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Six PE lessons at school can reduce children's CVD risk measured as a composite risk score. The changes in risk score are considered substantial in the perspective of public health strategy for preventing CVD in later life.
AIMS: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) originates during childhood and adolescence. Schools are potentially effective settings for early public health prevention strategies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of six physical education (PE) lessons on children's CVD risk. METHODS: This longitudinal study in 10 public schools (1218 children, aged 6-13 years), 6 intervention and 4 control schools evaluates a natural experiment, where intervention schools tripled PE to six lessons per week compared to the mandatory two PE lessons in the control schools. Baseline (2008) and 2-year follow-up measures were anthropometrics, cardiorespiratory fitness, blood pressure and blood samples providing lipids and measures for insulin resistance. Based on these variables, a composite risk score was calculated and used for further analysis. Multivariate multilevel mixed effect regression models were used to estimate effect of intervention taking the hierarchical structure of data into account. Individual, class and school were considered random effects. Intra class correlation (ICC) was calculated. RESULTS: Intervention significantly lowered mean of composite risk score with 0.17 SD (95% CI: -0.34 to -0.01). Six PE lessons per week had a beneficial effect on triglycerides (TG) levels (-0.18 SD, 95% CI: -0.36 to 0.00), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (-0.22 SD, 95% CI: -0.42 to -0.02) and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (-0.17 SD, 95% CI: -0.34 to 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Six PE lessons at school can reduce children's CVD risk measured as a composite risk score. The changes in risk score are considered substantial in the perspective of public health strategy for preventing CVD in later life.
Authors: Niels Christian Møller; Jakob Tarp; Eva Friis Kamelarczyk; Jan Christian Brønd; Heidi Klakk; Niels Wedderkopp Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2014-09-24 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Corina S Rueegg; Susi Kriemler; Simeon J Zuercher; Christina Schindera; Andrea Renner; Helge Hebestreit; Christian Meier; Prisca Eser; Nicolas X von der Weid Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Jakob Tarp; Eva Jespersen; Niels Christian Møller; Heidi Klakk; Barbara Wessner; Niels Wedderkopp; Anna Bugge Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Lise Hestbaek; Sarah Thurøe Andersen; Thomas Skovgaard; Line Groenholt Olesen; Mette Elmose; Dorthe Bleses; Simon Calmar Andersen; Henrik Hein Lauridsen Journal: Trials Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Jakob Tarp; Jan Christian Brønd; Lars Bo Andersen; Niels Christian Møller; Karsten Froberg; Anders Grøntved Journal: J Sport Health Sci Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 7.179
Authors: Diogo Henrique Constantino Coledam; Philippe Fanelli Ferraiol; João Paulo de Aguiar Greca; Marcio Teixeira; Arli Ramos de Oliveira Journal: Rev Paul Pediatr Date: 2018-03-29