Literature DB >> 24055793

Viscoelastic properties of a synthetic meniscus implant.

Maoz Shemesh1, Roy Asher, Eyal Zylberberg, Farshid Guilak, Eran Linder-Ganz, Jonathan J Elsner.   

Abstract

There are significant potential advantages for restoration of meniscal function using a bio-stable synthetic implant that combines long-term durability with a dependable biomechanical performance resembling that of the natural meniscus. A novel meniscus implant made of a compliant polycarbonate-urethane matrix reinforced with high modulus ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene fibers was designed as a composite structure that mimics the structural elements of the natural medial meniscus. The overall success of such an implant is linked on its capability to replicate the stress distribution in the knee over the long-term. As this function of the device is directly dependent on its mechanical properties, changes to the material due to exposure to the joint environment and repeated loading could have non-trivial influences on the viscoelastic properties of the implant. Thus, the goal of this study was to measure and characterize the strain-rate response, as well as the viscoelastic properties of the implant as measured by creep, stress relaxation, and hysteresis after simulated use, by subjecting the implant to realistic joint loads up to 2 million cycles in a joint-like setting. The meniscus implant behaved as a non-linear viscoelastic material. The implant underwent minimal plastic deformation after 2 million fatigue loading cycles. Under low compressive loads, the implant was fairly flexible, and able to deform relatively easily (E=120-200 kPa). However as the compressive load applied on the implant was increased, the implant became stiffer (E=3.8-5.2 MPa), to resist deformation. The meniscus implant appears well-matched to the viscoelastic properties of the natural meniscus, and importantly, these properties were found to remain stable and minimally affected by potentially degradative and loading conditions associated with long-term use.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Creep; Fatigue; Polycarbonate-urethane; Prosthesis; Relaxation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24055793     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.08.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  9 in total

1.  Fatigue life of bovine meniscus under longitudinal and transverse tensile loading.

Authors:  Jaremy J Creechley; Madison E Krentz; Trevor J Lujan
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2016-12-27

2.  Extrusion and Microfluidic-based Bioprinting to Fabricate Biomimetic Tissues and Organs.

Authors:  Elham Davoodi; Einollah Sarikhani; Hossein Montazerian; Samad Ahadian; Marco Costantini; Wojciech Swieszkowski; Stephanie Willerth; Konrad Walus; Mohammad Mofidfar; Ehsan Toyserkani; Ali Khademhosseini; Nureddin Ashammakhi
Journal:  Adv Mater Technol       Date:  2020-05-26

Review 3.  [Indication and limitations of meniscus replacement].

Authors:  C Stärke; S Kopf; R Becker
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Human Knee Meniscus Regeneration Strategies: a Review on Recent Advances.

Authors:  Mamatha M Pillai; J Gopinathan; R Selvakumar; Amitava Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Preliminary Results From a US Clinical Trial of a Novel Synthetic Polymer Meniscal Implant.

Authors:  Brian P McKeon; Kenneth R Zaslav; Richard H Alfred; R Maxwell Alley; Richard H Edelson; Wayne K Gersoff; Jonathan E Greenleaf; Christopher C Kaeding
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-09-29

Review 6.  Meniscal scaffolds: results and indications. A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Filardo; Luca Andriolo; Elizaveta Kon; Francesca de Caro; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-06-29       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  In Vitro Testing of Scaffolds for Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Based Meniscus Tissue Engineering-Introducing a New Biocompatibility Scoring System.

Authors:  Felix P Achatz; Richard Kujat; Christian G Pfeifer; Matthias Koch; Michael Nerlich; Peter Angele; Johannes Zellner
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Dynamic pressure analysis of novel interpositional knee spacer implants in 3D-printed human knee models.

Authors:  Korbinian Glatzeder; Komnik Igor; Felix Ambellan; Stefan Zachow; Wolfgang Potthast
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Biomechanical, structural and biological characterisation of a new silk fibroin scaffold for meniscal repair.

Authors:  Daniela Warnecke; Svenja Stein; Melanie Haffner-Luntzer; Luisa de Roy; Nick Skaer; Robert Walker; Oliver Kessler; Anita Ignatius; Lutz Dürselen
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-06-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.