Literature DB >> 24055594

Encoding negative events under stress: high subjective arousal is related to accurate emotional memory despite misinformation exposure.

Siobhan M Hoscheidt1, Kevin S LaBar2, Lee Ryan3, W Jake Jacobs3, Lynn Nadel3.   

Abstract

Stress at encoding affects memory processes, typically enhancing, or preserving, memory for emotional information. These effects have interesting implications for eyewitness accounts, which in real-world contexts typically involve encoding an aversive event under stressful conditions followed by potential exposure to misinformation. The present study investigated memory for a negative event encoded under stress and subsequent misinformation endorsement. Healthy young adults participated in a between-groups design with three experimental sessions conducted 48 h apart. Session one consisted of a psychosocial stress induction (or control task) followed by incidental encoding of a negative slideshow. During session two, participants were asked questions about the slideshow, during which a random subgroup was exposed to misinformation. Memory for the slideshow was tested during the third session. Assessment of memory accuracy across stress and no-stress groups revealed that stress induced just prior to encoding led to significantly better memory for the slideshow overall. The classic misinformation effect was also observed - participants exposed to misinformation were significantly more likely to endorse false information during memory testing. In the stress group, however, memory accuracy and misinformation effects were moderated by arousal experienced during encoding of the negative event. Misinformed-stress group participants who reported that the negative slideshow elicited high arousal during encoding were less likely to endorse misinformation for the most aversive phase of the story. Furthermore, these individuals showed better memory for components of the aversive slideshow phase that had been directly misinformed. Results from the current study provide evidence that stress and high subjective arousal elicited by a negative event act concomitantly during encoding to enhance emotional memory such that the most aversive aspects of the event are well remembered and subsequently more resistant to misinformation effects.
Copyright © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arousal; Emotional memory; Eyewitness testimony; Misinformation; Stress

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24055594     DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2013.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  9 in total

1.  Stress impacts the fidelity but not strength of emotional memories.

Authors:  Maheen Shermohammed; Juliet Y Davidow; Leah H Somerville; Vishnu P Murty
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  The effects of acute stress on episodic memory: A meta-analysis and integrative review.

Authors:  Grant S Shields; Matthew A Sazma; Andrew M McCullough; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Associations between lifetime stress exposure and prenatal health behaviors.

Authors:  Teresa Smith; Elaina Johns-Wolfe; Grant S Shields; Jennifer Malat; Farrah Jacquez; George M Slavich
Journal:  Stress Health       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Blunted cortisol response to acute pre-learning stress prevents misinformation effect in a forced confabulation paradigm.

Authors:  Phillip R Zoladz; Chelsea E Cadle; Alison M Dailey; Miranda K Fiely; David M Peters; Hannah E Nagle; Brianne E Mosley; Amanda R Scharf; Callie M Brown; Tessa J Duffy; McKenna B Earley; Boyd R Rorabaugh; Kristie E Payment
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 3.587

5.  Influence of age on the effects of lying on memory.

Authors:  Laura E Paige; Eric C Fields; Angela Gutchess
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  The inhibitory avoidance discrimination task to investigate accuracy of memory.

Authors:  Erika Atucha; Benno Roozendaal
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Amphetamine and the Smart Drug 3,4-Methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) Induce Generalization of Fear Memory in Rats.

Authors:  Paola Colucci; Giulia Federica Mancini; Alessia Santori; Clemens Zwergel; Antonello Mai; Viviana Trezza; Benno Roozendaal; Patrizia Campolongo
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 5.639

8.  The effects of stress on eyewitness memory: A survey of memory experts and laypeople.

Authors:  Carey Marr; Henry Otgaar; Melanie Sauerland; Conny W E M Quaedflieg; Lorraine Hope
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-11-25

9.  Correlation between suicidal ideation and emotional memory in adolescents with depressive disorder.

Authors:  Shuwen Hu; Daming Mo; Pengfei Guo; Hongyu Zheng; Xiaolu Jiang; Hui Zhong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.