Gary A Dildy1, Michael A Belfort1, C David Adair2, Kimberly Destefano3, Donna Robinson3, Garrett Lam4, Thomas H Strong4, Clive Polon5, Robert Massaro6, Jayasri Bukkapatnam7, James W Van Hook8, Iskander Kassis9, Shiraz Sunderji10. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, and Glenveigh Medical, LLC, Chattanooga, TN. 3. St. David's Women's Center of Texas, Austin, TX. 4. Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ. 5. St. David's Medical Center, Austin, TX. 6. Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ. 7. Orlando Health, Orlando, FL. 8. University of Cincinnati, Greater Cincinnati OB/GYN, Cincinnati, OH. 9. UHS-Wilson Medical Center, Johnson City, NY. 10. The Toledo Hospital, Toledo, OH.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: When uterotonics fail to cause sustained uterine contractions and satisfactory control of hemorrhage after delivery, tamponade of the uterus can be effective in decreasing hemorrhage secondary to uterine atony. STUDY DESIGN: These data are from a postmarketing surveillance study of a novel dual-balloon catheter tamponade device, the Belfort-Dildy Obstetrical Tamponade System (ebb). RESULTS: A total of 57 women were enrolled: 55 women had the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage, and 51 women had uterine balloon placement within the uterine cavity. This study reports the outcomes in the 51 women who had uterine balloon placement within the uterine cavity for treatment of postpartum hemorrhage, as defined by the "Instructions for Use." We further assessed 4 subgroups: uterine atony only (n = 28 women), placentation abnormalities (n = 8 women), both uterine atony and placentation abnormalities (n = 9 women), and neither uterine atony nor placentation abnormalities (n = 6 women). The median (range) time interval between delivery and balloon placement was 2.2 hours (0.3-210 hours) for the entire cohort (n = 51 women) and 1.3 hours (0.5-7.0 hours) for the uterine atony only group (n = 28 women). Bleeding decreased in 22/51 of cases (43%), stopped in 28/51 of cases (55%), thus decreased or stopped in 50/51 of the cases (98%) after balloon placement. Nearly one-half (23/51) of all women required uterine balloon volumes of >500 mL to control bleeding. CONCLUSION: We conclude that uterine/vaginal balloon tamponade is very useful in the management of postpartum hemorrhage because of uterine atony and abnormal placentation.
OBJECTIVE: When uterotonics fail to cause sustained uterine contractions and satisfactory control of hemorrhage after delivery, tamponade of the uterus can be effective in decreasing hemorrhage secondary to uterine atony. STUDY DESIGN: These data are from a postmarketing surveillance study of a novel dual-balloon catheter tamponade device, the Belfort-Dildy Obstetrical Tamponade System (ebb). RESULTS: A total of 57 women were enrolled: 55 women had the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage, and 51 women had uterine balloon placement within the uterine cavity. This study reports the outcomes in the 51 women who had uterine balloon placement within the uterine cavity for treatment of postpartum hemorrhage, as defined by the "Instructions for Use." We further assessed 4 subgroups: uterine atony only (n = 28 women), placentation abnormalities (n = 8 women), both uterine atony and placentation abnormalities (n = 9 women), and neither uterine atony nor placentation abnormalities (n = 6 women). The median (range) time interval between delivery and balloon placement was 2.2 hours (0.3-210 hours) for the entire cohort (n = 51 women) and 1.3 hours (0.5-7.0 hours) for the uterine atony only group (n = 28 women). Bleeding decreased in 22/51 of cases (43%), stopped in 28/51 of cases (55%), thus decreased or stopped in 50/51 of the cases (98%) after balloon placement. Nearly one-half (23/51) of all women required uterine balloon volumes of >500 mL to control bleeding. CONCLUSION: We conclude that uterine/vaginal balloon tamponade is very useful in the management of postpartum hemorrhage because of uterine atony and abnormal placentation.
Authors: Maria Fernanda Escobar; Anwar H Nassar; Gerhard Theron; Eythan R Barnea; Wanda Nicholson; Diana Ramasauskaite; Isabel Lloyd; Edwin Chandraharan; Suellen Miller; Thomas Burke; Gabriel Ossanan; Javier Andres Carvajal; Isabella Ramos; Maria Antonia Hincapie; Sara Loaiza; Daniela Nasner Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2022-03 Impact factor: 4.447
Authors: Alexandre Dumont; Cécile Bodin; Benjamin Hounkpatin; Thomas Popowski; Mamadou Traoré; René Perrin; Patrick Rozenberg Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 2.692