Literature DB >> 24055444

A clinical and angiographic study of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: the EXECUTIVE trial (EXecutive RCT: evaluating XIENCE V in a multi vessel disease).

Flavio Ribichini1, Michele Romano, Renato Rosiello, Luigi La Vecchia, Ester Cabianca, Giuseppe Caramanno, Diego Milazzo, Paolo Loschiavo, Stefano Rigattieri, Salvatore Musarò, Bruno Pironi, Antonio Fiscella, Francesco Amico, Ciro Indolfi, Carmen Spaccarotella, Antonio Bartorelli, Daniela Trabattoni, Francesco Della Rovere, Andrea Rolandi, Federico Beqaraj, Riccardo Belli, Pietro Sangiorgio, Rosvaldo Villani, Andrea Berni, Imad Sheiban, Maria Josè Lopera Quijada, Barbara Cappi, Licia Ribaldi, Corrado Vassanelli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the efficacy and performance of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent (EES) (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) in the treatment of de novo coronary lesions in patients with 2- to 3-vessel multivessel coronary artery disease (MV-CAD).
BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stents (DES) have emerged as an alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with MV-CAD although first-generation DES yielded inferior efficacy and safety compared with surgery.
METHODS: Prospective, randomized (1:1), multicenter feasibility trial was designed to assess angiographic efficacy of EES compared with the TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in 200 patients, and a prospective, open-label, single-arm, controlled registry was designed to analyze the clinical outcome of EES at 1-year follow-up in 400 MV-CAD patients. For the randomized trial, the primary endpoint was in-stent late loss at 9 months. For the registry, the primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization at 12 months.
RESULTS: The primary endpoint per single lesion was significantly lower in the EES group compared with the PES group (-0.03 ± 0.49 mm vs. 0.23 ± 0.51 mm, p = 0.001). Similar results were observed when analyzing all lesions (0.05 ± 0.51 mm vs. 0.24 ± 0.50 mm, p < 0.001). Clinical outcome at 1 year yielded a composite of major adverse cardiac events of 9.2% in the single-arm registry, and 11.1% and 16.5% in the EES and PES randomized groups, respectively (p = 0.30).
CONCLUSIONS: The EXECUTIVE trial was a randomized pilot trial dedicated to the comparison of the efficacy of 2 different DES among patients with 2- to 3-vessel MV-CAD. The study shows lower in-stent late loss at 9 months with the EES XIENCE V compared with the PES TAXUS Libertè, and a low major adverse cardiac event rate at 1 year in patients with 2-to 3-vessel MV-CAD. (EXECUTIVE [EXecutive RCT: Evaluating XIENCE V in a Multi Vessel Disease]; NCT00531011).
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAD; CI; DES; EES; MACE; MLD; MV; PCI; PES; QCA; TVR; confidence interval; coronary artery disease; drug-eluting stent(s); everolimus-eluting stent(s); major adverse cardiac event(s); minimal lumen diameter; multivessel; multivessel disease; paclitaxel-eluting stent(s); percutaneous coronary intervention; quantitative coronary angiography; randomized clinical trial; target vessel revascularization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24055444     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  7 in total

1.  Impact of catheter size on reliability of quantitative coronary angiographic measurements (comparison of 4Fr and 6Fr catheters).

Authors:  Shigenori Ito; Kanako Kinoshita; Akiko Endo; Masato Nakamura; Toshiya Muramatsu
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Drug-eluting stent or coronary artery bypass graft surgery in hemodialysis patients?

Authors:  Flavio Ribichini; Corrado Vassanelli
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.902

3.  First-generation versus second-generation drug-eluting stents in current clinical practice: updated evidence from a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials comprising 31 379 patients.

Authors:  Eliano Pio Navarese; Mariusz Kowalewski; David Kandzari; Alexandra Lansky; Bartosz Górny; Lukasz Kołtowski; Ron Waksman; Sergio Berti; Giuseppe Musumeci; Ugo Limbruno; Rene J van der Schaaf; Malte Kelm; Jacek Kubica; Harry Suryapranata
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2014-08-21

4.  A clinical evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimus eluting stent in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease: Result from Thailand Registry - XIENCE V performance evaluation (THRIVE study).

Authors:  Songsak Kiatchoosakun; Pavit Pienvichit; Srun Kuanprasert; Navin Suraphakdee; Arintaya Phromminikul
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2016-10-26

5.  Hypertension Is an Independent Predictor of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in Young Adults with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Junhua Ge; Jian Li; Haichu Yu; Bo Hou
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.420

6.  Everolimus-eluting stents: update on current clinical studies.

Authors:  Dominic J Allocco; Anita A Joshi; Keith D Dawkins
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2011-07-26

Review 7.  Rapamycin and its analogues (rapalogs) for Tuberous Sclerosis Complex-associated tumors: a systematic review on non-randomized studies using meta-analysis.

Authors:  Teguh Haryo Sasongko; Nur Farrah Dila Ismail; Nik Mohamad Ariff Nik Abdul Malik; Z A M H Zabidi-Hussin
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 4.123

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.