OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of transarterial chemoembolization with gemcitabine in patients with inoperable liver metastases of breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Open-label, prospective non-randomized single-center study design; patients had previous chemotherapy including anthracyclines and/or taxanes in the metastatic setting, adequate bone marrow reserve, sufficient liver/renal function, no centralnervous system metastases, Karnovsky-performance-status >70%, and life expectancy >12 weeks. Forty-three patients were enrolled (median 58 years, range 48-71). A suspension of gemcitabine 1.200mg/m(2), 2-10 ml/m(2) of Lipiodol, and 5 ml of a degradable starch microsphere (Embocept) suspension, were administered intra-arterially up to 3 times with a 4-weaks-interval. Dose-limiting toxicit is defined as grade 4 thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, or nonhematologic toxicity>grade 3. Tumor response was evaluated by magnetic resonance (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) imaging. RESULTS: All patients tolerated the treatment well; with no dose limiting toxicities. Imaging follow-up according to the RECIST-criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) revealed a partial response in 3 patients, stable disease in 16 patients and progression in 22 patients. The progression free survival was 3.3 months. A significant correlation exists only with the factor vascularization: strongly vascularized tumors show a significantly lowered response. Patients with complete or partial response and the main fraction of the stable disease group showed in the MRI and angiography only a moderate vascularization. The resulting estimate of the total survival rate amounts to a median of 10.2 months. CONCLUSION: Transarterial chemoembolization with gemcitabine is well tolerated and provides an alternative treatment method for patients with liver metastases of breast cancer.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of transarterial chemoembolization with gemcitabine in patients with inoperable liver metastases of breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Open-label, prospective non-randomized single-center study design; patients had previous chemotherapy including anthracyclines and/or taxanes in the metastatic setting, adequate bone marrow reserve, sufficient liver/renal function, no centralnervous system metastases, Karnovsky-performance-status >70%, and life expectancy >12 weeks. Forty-three patients were enrolled (median 58 years, range 48-71). A suspension of gemcitabine 1.200mg/m(2), 2-10 ml/m(2) of Lipiodol, and 5 ml of a degradable starch microsphere (Embocept) suspension, were administered intra-arterially up to 3 times with a 4-weaks-interval. Dose-limiting toxicit is defined as grade 4 thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, or nonhematologic toxicity>grade 3. Tumor response was evaluated by magnetic resonance (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) imaging. RESULTS: All patients tolerated the treatment well; with no dose limiting toxicities. Imaging follow-up according to the RECIST-criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) revealed a partial response in 3 patients, stable disease in 16 patients and progression in 22 patients. The progression free survival was 3.3 months. A significant correlation exists only with the factor vascularization: strongly vascularized tumors show a significantly lowered response. Patients with complete or partial response and the main fraction of the stable disease group showed in the MRI and angiography only a moderate vascularization. The resulting estimate of the total survival rate amounts to a median of 10.2 months. CONCLUSION: Transarterial chemoembolization with gemcitabine is well tolerated and provides an alternative treatment method for patients with liver metastases of breast cancer.
Authors: Andrew C Gordon; William J Gradishar; Virginia G Kaklamani; Avesh J Thuluvath; Robert K Ryu; Kent T Sato; Vanessa L Gates; Riad Salem; Robert J Lewandowski Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2014-08-22 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Samdeep K Mouli; Ramona Gupta; Neil Sheth; Andrew C Gordon; Robert J Lewandowski Journal: Semin Intervent Radiol Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 1.513
Authors: B M Aarts; F M Gómez Muñoz; H Wildiers; V O Dezentjé; T R Baetens; W Schats; M Lopez-Yurda; R C Dresen; B J de Wit-van der Veen; C M Deroose; G Maleux; R G H Beets-Tan; E G Klompenhouwer Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2021-07-28 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Jenson Ma; Juan Martin Gimenez; Tyler Sandow; Daniel Devun; David Kirsch; Paul Gulotta; Patrick Gilbert; Dennis Kay Journal: Ochsner J Date: 2017