Literature DB >> 24055334

From cue to meaning: brain mechanisms supporting the construction of expectations of pain.

Oleg V Lobanov1, Fadel Zeidan2, John G McHaffie2, Robert A Kraft3, Robert C Coghill4.   

Abstract

The brain mechanisms by which sensory cues become transformed into expectations of impending events are a critical component of cognitive tuning of sensory processing. However, distinctions among the afferent processing of cue-related activity itself versus those mechanisms supporting the contextual meaning imparted to the cue remain limited. Do sensory cues with equal meaning engage similar patterns of brain activations even if they are delivered in separate modalities? To address this question, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging of an expectation paradigm in which cues were delivered with visual or innocuous thermal stimuli. Cues were designed to be highly meaningful because they predicted the delivery of high and low painful stimuli. As expected, the cues themselves activated unimodal sensory cortices. This cue modality-specific activation was transformed into a pattern of activity reflecting cue meaning. Cues signaling high pain produced greater activity in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex. Such activity is consistent with the graded encoding of the magnitude of expected pain. In contrast, cues signaling low pain produced greater activity in the right intraparietal sulcus. This activation may reflect processes directing spatial attention to the stimulated body region in order to more accurately evaluate the relatively weak, low pain stimulus. Taken together, these findings indicate that cues arising from different sensory modalities ultimately engage common brain mechanisms that reflect the meaning of the cue. This meaning-related activity is presumably critical for preparing sensory systems to optimally process afferent information.
Copyright © 2013 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACC; DLPFC; Expectations; IPS; fMRI

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24055334      PMCID: PMC3947355          DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  40 in total

1.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control.

Authors:  J B Hopfinger; M H Buonocore; G R Mangun
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Expectation of pain enhances responses to nonpainful somatosensory stimulation in the anterior cingulate cortex and parietal operculum/posterior insula: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  N Sawamoto; M Honda; T Okada; T Hanakawa; M Kanda; H Fukuyama; J Konishi; H Shibasaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The subjective experience of pain: where expectations become reality.

Authors:  Tetsuo Koyama; John G McHaffie; Paul J Laurienti; Robert C Coghill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  M Corbetta; J M Kincade; J M Ollinger; M P McAvoy; G L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Dissociating the roles of the default-mode, dorsal, and ventral networks in episodic memory retrieval.

Authors:  Hongkeun Kim
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales.

Authors:  D D Price; F M Bush; S Long; S W Harkins
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Insula of the old world monkey. II: Afferent cortical input and comments on the claustrum.

Authors:  E J Mufson; M M Mesulam
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1982-11-20       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Brain mediators of predictive cue effects on perceived pain.

Authors:  Lauren Y Atlas; Niall Bolger; Martin A Lindquist; Tor D Wager
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Brain mechanisms supporting spatial discrimination of pain.

Authors:  Yoshitetsu Oshiro; Alexandre S Quevedo; John G McHaffie; Robert A Kraft; Robert C Coghill
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The context of a noxious stimulus affects the pain it evokes.

Authors:  G Lorimer Moseley; Arnoud Arntz
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Mindfulness meditation-based pain relief: a mechanistic account.

Authors:  Fadel Zeidan; David R Vago
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Pain sensitivity is inversely related to regional grey matter density in the brain.

Authors:  Nichole M Emerson; Fadel Zeidan; Oleg V Lobanov; Morten S Hadsel; Katherine T Martucci; Alexandre S Quevedo; Christopher J Starr; Hadas Nahman-Averbuch; Irit Weissman-Fogel; Yelena Granovsky; David Yarnitsky; Robert C Coghill
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 3.  Employing pain and mindfulness to understand consciousness: a symbiotic relationship.

Authors:  Joshua A Grant; Fadel Zeidan
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-01-09

4.  Altered brain responses in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome during cued and uncued pain expectation.

Authors:  J-Y Hong; B Naliboff; J S Labus; A Gupta; L A Kilpatrick; C Ashe-McNalley; J Stains; N Heendeniya; S R Smith; K Tillisch; E A Mayer
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Targeting Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Modulates Task-Induced Acute Pain in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Timothy Y Mariano; Mascha Van't Wout; Sarah L Garnaat; Steven A Rasmussen; Benjamin D Greenberg
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.750

6.  The Role of Expectations and Endogenous Opioids in Mindfulness-Based Relief of Experimentally Induced Acute Pain.

Authors:  Laura Case; Adrienne L Adler-Neal; Rebecca E Wells; Fadel Zeidan
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug 01       Impact factor: 4.312

7.  Brain mechanisms supporting violated expectations of pain.

Authors:  Fadel Zeidan; Oleg V Lobanov; Robert A Kraft; Robert C Coghill
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 7.926

8.  Mindfulness-Meditation-Based Pain Relief Is Not Mediated by Endogenous Opioids.

Authors:  Fadel Zeidan; Adrienne L Adler-Neal; Rebecca E Wells; Emily Stagnaro; Lisa M May; James C Eisenach; John G McHaffie; Robert C Coghill
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Mindfulness Meditation-Based Pain Relief Employs Different Neural Mechanisms Than Placebo and Sham Mindfulness Meditation-Induced Analgesia.

Authors:  Fadel Zeidan; Nichole M Emerson; Suzan R Farris; Jenna N Ray; Youngkyoo Jung; John G McHaffie; Robert C Coghill
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Detection of central circuits implicated in the formation of novel pain memories.

Authors:  Jaymin Upadhyay; Julia Granitzka; Thomas Bauermann; Ulf Baumgärtner; Markus Breimhorst; Rolf-Detlef Treede; Frank Birklein
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.