Literature DB >> 24054946

Exploring the roles of integrin binding and cytoskeletal reorganization during mesenchymal stem cell mechanotransduction in soft and stiff hydrogels subjected to dynamic compression.

Andrew J Steward1, Diane R Wagner2, Daniel J Kelly3.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to explore how the response of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to dynamic compression (DC) depends on their pericellular environment and the development of their cytoskeleton. MSCs were first seeded into 3% agarose hydrogels, stimulated with the chondrogenic growth factor TGF-β3 and exposed to DC (~10% strain at 1Hz) for 1h on either day 7, 14, or 21 of culture. At each time point, the actin, vimentin and tubulin networks of the MSCs were assessed using confocal microscopy. Similar to previous results, MSCs displayed a temporal response to DC; however, no dramatic changes in gross cytoskeletal organization were observed with time in culture. Vinculin (a membrane-cytoskeletal protein in focal adhesions) staining appeared more intense with time in culture. We next aimed to explore how changes to the pericellular environment, independent of the duration of exposure to TGF-β3, would influence the response of MSCs to DC. To this end, MSCs were encapsulated into either 'soft' or 'stiff' agarose hydrogels that are known to differentially support pericellular matrix (PCM) development. The application of DC led to greater relative increases in the expression of chondrogenic marker genes in the stiffer hydrogels, where the MSCs were found to have a more well developed PCM. These increases in gene expression were not observed following the addition of RGDS, an integrin blocker, suggesting that integrin binding plays a role in determining the response of MSCs to DC. Microtubule organization in MSCs was found to adapt in response to DC, but this effect was not integrin mediated, as this cytoskeletal reorganization was also observed in the presence of RGDS. In conclusion, although the PCM, integrin binding, and cytoskeletal reorganization are all involved in mechanotransduction of DC, none of these factors in isolation was able to completely explain the temporal mechanosensitivity of MSCs to dynamic compression.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytoskeleton; Focal adhesion; Mechanobiology; Mechanotransduction; Mesenchymal; Pericellular matrix

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24054946     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  7 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical regulation of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Andrew J Steward; Daniel J Kelly
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Integrins in the Regulation of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation by Mechanical Signals.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Fuwen Zheng; Ruixue Song; Lequan Zhuang; Ming Yang; Jian Suo; Lisha Li
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 5.739

3.  Influence of the mechanical environment on the engineering of mineralised tissues using human dental pulp stem cells and silk fibroin scaffolds.

Authors:  Anna Woloszyk; Sabrina Holsten Dircksen; Nagihan Bostanci; Ralph Müller; Sandra Hofmann; Thimios A Mitsiadis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Cyclic Tensile Strain Can Play a Role in Directing both Intramembranous and Endochondral Ossification of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Simon F Carroll; Conor T Buckley; Daniel J Kelly
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2017-11-27

Review 5.  Dental Pulp Stem Cell Mechanoresponsiveness: Effects of Mechanical Stimuli on Dental Pulp Stem Cell Behavior.

Authors:  Massimo Marrelli; Bruna Codispoti; Richard M Shelton; Ben A Scheven; Paul R Cooper; Marco Tatullo; Francesco Paduano
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  An automated 3D-printed perfusion bioreactor combinable with pulsed electromagnetic field stimulators for bone tissue investigations.

Authors:  Stefano Gabetti; Beatrice Masante; Andrea Cochis; Giovanni Putame; Alessandro Sanginario; Ileana Armando; Elisa Fiume; Alessandro Calogero Scalia; Farah Daou; Francesco Baino; Simona Salati; Umberto Morbiducci; Lia Rimondini; Cristina Bignardi; Diana Massai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Modeling the effect of ascites-induced compression on ovarian cancer multicellular aggregates.

Authors:  Yuliya Klymenko; Rebecca B Wates; Holly Weiss-Bilka; Rachel Lombard; Yueying Liu; Leigh Campbell; Oleg Kim; Diane Wagner; Matthew J Ravosa; M Sharon Stack
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.758

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.