Literature DB >> 24054893

The smoothness of unconstrained head movements is velocity-dependent.

Harald Vikne1, Eva Sigrid Bakke, Knut Liestøl, Gunnar Sandbæk, Nina Vøllestad.   

Abstract

Non-smooth, irregular movements reported in persons with neck pain have been suggested to signify motor impairment. However, irregular movements are additionally observed during slow movements in healthy participants. We therefore examined whether the smoothness of head movements is related to the movement speed in 26 healthy participants. Six unconstrained small and large amplitude head movements were completed in the sagittal plane at three different self-chosen speeds. Kinematic variables were calculated from position data and overall smoothness of the movement was assessed by the normalized jerk cost (NJC). Relationship between NJC and average movement angular velocity was analyzed using a mixed factor model. Movement duration, angular velocity, NJC and number of submovements differed significantly between speed conditions for all movement directions and amplitudes (all p<.05). We found a strong relationship between the average angular velocity and NJC across all movement directions and amplitudes (all p<.0001). Large amplitude movements showed higher NJC for a given movement velocity than small amplitude movements (p<.001). We have shown that the smoothness of head movements is strongly related to the movement velocity, thus fast movements are smooth while slow movements are jerky. In addition, movements of larger amplitude are less smooth than movements of smaller amplitude.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2221; Head kinematics; Movement smoothness; Movement velocity; Normalized jerk cost; Submovements

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24054893     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2012.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  10 in total

1.  Neck motion kinematics: an inter-tester reliability study using an interactive neck VR assessment in asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Hilla Sarig Bahat; Elliot Sprecher; Itamar Sela; Julia Treleaven
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Evidence for a general stiffening motor control pattern in neck pain: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Ingebrigt Meisingset; Astrid Woodhouse; Ann-Katrin Stensdotter; Øyvind Stavdahl; Håvard Lorås; Sigmund Gismervik; Hege Andresen; Kristian Austreim; Ottar Vasseljen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Synchrony in Joint Action Is Directed by Each Participant's Motor Control System.

Authors:  Lior Noy; Netta Weiser; Jason Friedman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-10

4.  Development of the circumduction metric for identification of cervical motion impairment.

Authors:  Yue Zhou; Eldon Loh; James P Dickey; David M Walton; Ana Luisa Trejos
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2018-07-25

5.  Electronic measures of movement impairment, repositioning, and posture in people with and without neck pain-a systematic review.

Authors:  Bue Bonderup Hesby; Jan Hartvigsen; Hanne Rasmussen; Per Kjaer
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-08-27

6.  Effects of Future Information and Trajectory Complexity on Kinematic Signal and Muscle Activation during Visual-Motor Tracking.

Authors:  Linchuan Deng; Jie Luo; Yueling Lyu; Rong Song
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.524

7.  Onset Timing of Hyoid Muscles Activation during Cervical Flexion Is Position-Dependent: An EMG Study.

Authors:  Hirofumi Sageshima; Dagmar Pavlů; Dominika Dvořáčková; David Pánek
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-24

8.  Muscle activity and head kinematics in unconstrained movements in subjects with chronic neck pain; cervical motor dysfunction or low exertion motor output?

Authors:  Harald Vikne; Eva Sigrid Bakke; Knut Liestøl; Stian R Engen; Nina Vøllestad
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 9.  On the analysis of movement smoothness.

Authors:  Sivakumar Balasubramanian; Alejandro Melendez-Calderon; Agnes Roby-Brami; Etienne Burdet
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Smoothness of movement in idiopathic cervical dystonia.

Authors:  Antonio Caronni; Pietro Arcuri; Ilaria Carpinella; Alberto Marzegan; Tiziana Lencioni; Marina Ramella; Alessandro Crippa; Denise Anastasi; Marco Rabuffetti; Maurizio Ferrarin; Anna Castagna
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.996

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.