Literature DB >> 24054346

Reliability and validity of pressure and temporal parameters recorded using a pressure-sensitive insole during running.

Robert Mann1, Laurent Malisoux, Roman Brunner, Paul Gette, Axel Urhausen, Andrew Statham, Kenneth Meijer, Daniel Theisen.   

Abstract

Running biomechanics has received increasing interest in recent literature on running-related injuries, calling for new, portable methods for large-scale measurements. Our aims were to define running strike pattern based on output of a new pressure-sensitive measurement device, the Runalyser, and to test its validity regarding temporal parameters describing running gait. Furthermore, reliability of the Runalyser measurements was evaluated, as well as its ability to discriminate different running styles. Thirty-one healthy participants (30.3 ± 7.4 years, 1.78 ± 0.10 m and 74.1 ± 12.1 kg) were involved in the different study parts. Eleven participants were instructed to use a rearfoot (RFS), midfoot (MFS) and forefoot (FFS) strike pattern while running on a treadmill. Strike pattern was subsequently defined using a linear regression (R(2)=0.89) between foot strike angle, as determined by motion analysis (1000 Hz), and strike index (SI, point of contact on the foot sole, as a percentage of foot sole length), as measured by the Runalyser. MFS was defined by the 95% confidence interval of the intercept (SI=43.9-49.1%). High agreement (overall mean difference 1.2%) was found between stance time, flight time, stride time and duty factor as determined by the Runalyser and a force-measuring treadmill (n=16 participants). Measurements of the two devices were highly correlated (R ≥ 0.80) and not significantly different. Test-retest intra-class correlation coefficients for all parameters were ≥ 0.94 (n=14 participants). Significant differences (p<0.05) between FFS, RFS and habitual running were detected regarding SI, stance time and stride time (n=24 participants). The Runalyser is suitable for, and easily applicable in large-scale studies on running biomechanics.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Foot strike pattern; Strike index

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24054346     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.08.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  3 in total

1.  Wearables for Running Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rachel Mason; Liam T Pearson; Gillian Barry; Fraser Young; Oisin Lennon; Alan Godfrey; Samuel Stuart
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 11.928

2.  Is Motorized Treadmill Running Biomechanically Comparable to Overground Running? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Over Studies.

Authors:  Bas Van Hooren; Joel T Fuller; Jonathan D Buckley; Jayme R Miller; Kerry Sewell; Guillaume Rao; Christian Barton; Chris Bishop; Richard W Willy
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Risk Factors for Injuries in Runners: A Systematic Review of Foot Strike Technique and Its Classification at Impact.

Authors:  Aoife Burke; Sarah Dillon; Siobhán O'Connor; Enda F Whyte; Shane Gore; Kieran A Moran
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-09-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.