Literature DB >> 24053905

Is prolonged mechanical ventilation of cancer patients futile?

Anne-Claire Toffart, Jean-François Timsit.   

Abstract

The issue of limiting life-sustaining treatments for intensive care unit (ICU) patients is complex. The ethical principles applied by ICU staff when making treatment-limitation decisions must comply with the law of their country. Until 2011, the law in Taiwan prohibited the withdrawal of mechanical ventilation. Consequently, patients with severe underlying diseases could receive prolonged mechanical ventilation. In a study conducted by Shih and colleagues in patients with cancer in Taiwan, continuous mechanical ventilation for more than 21 days was associated with poor outcomes, particularly in the subgroups of patients with metastases, lung cancer, or liver cancer. These results highlight the need for appropriate legislation regarding the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments in patients, especially those for whom no effective cancer treatments are available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24053905      PMCID: PMC4056103          DOI: 10.1186/cc13014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


In the previous issue of Critical Care, Shih and colleagues [1] report the results of a claims database study in 5,138 cancer patients who received prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) in Taiwan between 1997 and 2007. The authors describe the incidence, outcomes, and prognostic factors of PMV in this cohort. PMV was defined as at least 21 days of continuous mechanical ventilation. Most of the patients survived the acute illness but required a disproportionate amount of health-care resources [2]. The incidences of PMV were 10.4 patients per 100 intensive care unit (ICU) admissions with cancer overall and 14.9 per 100 admissions of patients with lung cancer. The prognosis was poor: 1-year survival rate was 14.3% (95% confidence interval 13.3% to 15.3%). Survival rate and life expectancy were worse in the subgroups with metastases, lung cancer, or liver cancer. As previously reported, mortality was dependent mainly on metastatic status and acute organ failure (acute renal failure or shock). Moreover, quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) was poor, ranging from 0.18 to 0.48 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) in patients in the best cognitive-function category. The same team previously [3] estimated the cost of PMV at USD $64,708 to USD $148,829 per QALY for patients with cancer. This study is original because it estimates the benefits of maximal treatment intensity in patients with cancer. In Taiwan, mechanical ventilation withdrawal, which may affect life expectancy [4], was illegal at the time of the study period. This is the first study on PMV for patients with cancer and the largest to investigate patients with cancer in the ICU. Furthermore, no previous data on outcomes of critically ill patients with different types of solid malignancies are available. Unlike in most other studies in critically ill patients with cancer, solid malignancies predominated (94% of patients). However, the data were extracted from a national health insurance database designed for cost evaluations and not for research purposes. A number of weaknesses of the study should be acknowledged. No data were available on the reason for ICU admission, severity of the acute disease, or performance status. Noninvasive mechanical ventilation and invasive mechanical ventilation were not distinguished from one another, and neither were intubation and tracheostomy. Furthermore, QALE was estimated by extrapolation from an external sample of 142 unselected ICU patients given PMV [3], and this fact may not be fully relevant to patients with cancer. The low QALE estimated for the first year was probably an underestimation of the overall quality of life during long-term survival, since quality of life has been reported to improve after 1 year in long-term survivors [5]. Little is known about the survival of patients with cancer treated with mechanical ventilation, particularly in those with solid malignancies. Differences have been reported according to the type of cancer. In lung cancer patients admitted to the ICU, 1-year survival was estimated to be 18% [6], versus 6.6% in the present study [1]. Mechanical ventilation for more than 96 hours affected quality of life and functional status but had no significant effect on survival in earlier studies [7,8]. In a multicenter hospital-discharge study in the US, mechanical ventilation for more than 96 hours, for any reason, resulted in higher hospital costs (USD $40,903 versus USD $14,434) with similar survival compared with shorter mechanical ventilation durations [8]. Similarly, among patients with cancer in a multicenter study from Brazil, including 91% given mechanical ventilation at ICU admission, hospital and 6-month mortality rates in those who spent more than 21 days in the ICU (50% and 60%, respectively) were similar to those in patients with shorter ICU stays (51% and 61%, respectively) [9]. In two other studies, no patients survived after being started on mechanical ventilation at least 3 days after ICU admission [10,11]. The prognostic factors in cancer patients admitted to the ICU are related to the history of the cancer, the condition of the patient, acute disease, and treatment-limitation decisions [4,12]. The current evidence supports ICU admission of patients with cancer for a period of full-code management followed by a reappraisal of the situation after 3 to 5 days [13]. Thus, many studies have established that clinical deterioration during the first days of mechanical ventilation predicts futility of further mechanical ventilation [6,14]. Shih and colleagues [1] showed, in contrast, that stabilization or improvement after the first 3 days is not associated with higher mortality rates after PMV. However, PMV may result in a high risk of quality-of-life impairments. This point underlines the importance of having the patient and family participate in the treatment decisions. Overall, PMV was beneficial in 14% of the cancer patients studied by Shih and colleagues [1]. However, the main characteristics of these patients are unknown. Further studies are warranted to determine which patients are likely to benefit from PMV according to their performance status, cancer history, and acute disease.

Abbreviations

ICU: Intensive care unit; PMV: Prolonged mechanical ventilation; QALE: Quality-adjusted life expectancy; QALY: Quality-adjusted life-year.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
  14 in total

1.  Use of intensive care in patients with nonresectable lung cancer.

Authors:  Anne-Claire Toffart; Clémence Minet; Bruno Raynard; Carole Schwebel; Rebecca Hamidfar-Roy; Samia Diab; Sébastien Quetant; Denis Moro-Sibilot; Elie Azoulay; Jean-François Timsit
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Outcomes of prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Shannon S Carson
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.687

3.  Short- and long-term outcomes of critically ill patients with cancer and prolonged ICU length of stay.

Authors:  Márcio Soares; Jorge I F Salluh; Viviane B L Torres; Juliana V R Leal; Nelson Spector
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Survival and quality of life: short-term versus long-term ventilator patients.

Authors:  Sara L Douglas; Barbara J Daly; Nahida Gordon; Patricia F Brennan
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  The prognosis of acute respiratory failure in critically ill cancer patients.

Authors:  Élie Azoulay; Guillaume Thiéry; Sylvie Chevret; Delphine Moreau; Michaël Darmon; Anne Bergeron; Kun Yang; Véronique Meignin; Magali Ciroldi; Jean-Roger Le Gall; Abdellatif Tazi; Benoît Schlemmer
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  The ICU trial: a new admission policy for cancer patients requiring mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Lucien Lecuyer; Sylvie Chevret; Guillaume Thiery; Michael Darmon; Benoît Schlemmer; Elie Azoulay
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Prolonged acute mechanical ventilation, hospital resource utilization, and mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Marya D Zilberberg; Rose S Luippold; Sandra Sulsky; Andrew F Shorr
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapy in ICU patients independently predict hospital death.

Authors:  Elie Azoulay; Frédéric Pochard; Maité Garrouste-Orgeas; Delphine Moreau; Laurent Montesino; Christophe Adrie; Arnaud de Lassence; Yves Cohen; Jean-François Timsit
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Cost per QALY (quality-adjusted life year) and lifetime cost of prolonged mechanical ventilation in Taiwan.

Authors:  Mei-Chuan Hung; Hsin-Ming Lu; Likwang Chen; Ming-Shian Lin; Cheng-Ren Chen; Chong-Jen Yu; Jung-Der Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Incidence, life expectancy and prognostic factors in cancer patients under prolonged mechanical ventilation: a nationwide analysis of 5,138 cases during 1998-2007.

Authors:  Chih-Yuan Shih; Mei-Chuan Hung; Hsin-Ming Lu; Likwang Chen; Sheng-Jean Huang; Jung-Der Wang
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.