Literature DB >> 24053766

Prospective analysis of penile length changes after radical prostatectomy.

Boback M Berookhim1, Christian J Nelson, Brian Kunzel, John P Mulhall, Joseph B Narus.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of radical prostatectomy (RP) on penile dimensions. To assess the impact of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5i) use on penile length changes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men undergoing RP were enrolled in this prospective study before surgery. Demographic, clinical and PDE5i frequency-of-use data were collected. Erectile function was measured using the erectile function domain (EFD) of the International Index of Erectile Function. A single evaluator measured stretched flaccid penile length (SFPL) before RP, and at 2 and 6 months after RP. Repeated measures analysis was used to test differences in SFPL between timepoints. Pearson correlation was used for univariate analyses and multiple regression was used for multivariable analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were evaluated at baseline, with 76 and 63 patients evaluated at 2 and 6 months, respectively. At 2 months, there was a 2.4-mm mean decrease in SFPL, while at 6 months there was no significant difference. At 6 months, those subjects who took a daily PDE5i had no SFPL loss (n = 36, 1±6.7 mm gain, P = 0.37 compared with baseline), while those subjects who did not consistently take a PDE5i had SFPL loss (n = 27, 4.4±6.6 mm loss, P < 0.002 compared with baseline). In multivariable analysis, PDE5i use at 6 months and 6-month EFD score without on-demand PDE5i were significant predictors of 6-month SFPL loss, suggesting that an increase in these variables leads to SFPL preservation.
CONCLUSIONS: In this rigorously conducted prospective study of SFPL changes after RP, there was evidence of SFPL loss at 2 months, but not at 6 months after RP. PDE5i use moderated SFPL loss, with patients who regularly used PDE5i having no loss in SFPL.
© 2013 The Authors. BJU International © 2013 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  erectile dysfunction; penile length; penile rehabilitation; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24053766     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  10 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of penile implants in patients with vasculogenic erectile dysfunction versus postradical prostatectomy erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  R Cocera; J Torremade; J F Suarez; J Fernandez-Concha; F Vigues
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 2.  Impact of Pelvic Anatomical Changes Caused by Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Kadono; Takahiro Nohara; Shohei Kawaguchi; Hiroaki Iwamoto; Hiroshi Yaegashi; Kazuyoshi Shigehara; Kouji Izumi; Atsushi Mizokami
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Neglected side effects to curative prostate cancer treatments.

Authors:  Alexander B Nolsøe; Christian Fuglesang S Jensen; Peter B Østergren; Mikkel Fode
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 2.896

4.  A Randomized, Controlled, 3-Arm Trial of Pharmacological Penile Rehabilitation in the Preservation of Erectile Function After Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Eduardo P Miranda; Nicole Benfante; Brian Kunzel; Christian J Nelson; John P Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 5.  Penile rehabilitation following prostate cancer treatment: review of current literature.

Authors:  Jonathan Clavell-Hernandez; Run Wang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Inflatable penile prosthesis implant length with baseline characteristic correlations: preliminary analysis of the PROPPER study.

Authors:  Nelson Bennett; Gerard Henry; Edward Karpman; William Brant; LeRoy Jones; Mohit Khera; Tobias Kohler; Brian Christine; Eugene Rhee; Bryan Kansas; Anthony J Bella
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-12

Review 7.  The controversy surrounding penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jonathan Clavell-Hernández; Run Wang
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-02

8.  Adding a vacuum erection device to regular use of Tadalafil improves penile rehabilitation after posterior urethroplasty.

Authors:  Dong-Liang Zhang; Zhong Chen; Fei-Xiang Wang; Jiong Zhang; Hong Xie; Ze-Yu Wang; Yu-Bo Gu; Qiang Fu; Lu-Jie Song
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 9.  Mapping the prevalence and use of questionnaires to detect the neglected sexual side effects after prostate cancer treatment: a scoping review.

Authors:  Pierre Röscher; Ronisha Sathiram; Joanne E Milios; Jacqueline M van Wyk
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-01-03

Review 10.  Vacuum therapy in penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: review of hemodynamic and antihypoxic evidence.

Authors:  Sheng-Qiang Qian; Liang Gao; Qiang Wei; Jiuhong Yuan
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.