| Literature DB >> 24053615 |
Elena Ciani1, Ingrid Alloggio, Ferruccio Petazzi, Elisa Pieragostini.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A study was carried out to evaluate the response of different native sheep breeds to experimental infection with Anaplasma ovis, the most prevalent sheep tick-borne pathogen in Apulia (Southern Italy). Thirty-four lambs belonging to a Northern European breed (Suffolk) and two Southern Italian breeds (Comisana and Altamurana) were infected. Eleven clinical as well as haematological parameters were monitored at different temporal resolutions on the same subjects before and after the infection, resulting in a data set of 435 observations. The present work, aiming to further the research, presents the results of a multivariate analysis carried out to identify which parameters out of the eleven considered are the most reliable parameters to be considered as markers of the disease phenotype as well as prognosticators of practical clinical importance.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24053615 PMCID: PMC3850957 DOI: 10.1186/1751-0147-55-71
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Vet Scand ISSN: 0044-605X Impact factor: 1.695
Experimental design
| 2009 | Search for carriers | 2010 | Search for carriers |
| 2009 | Splenectomization | 2010 | Splenectomization |
| 2009 | Infection of 8 Suffolk and 8 Comisana | 2010 | Infection of 18 Altamurana |
Variables and inclusion/removal parameters
| White blood cells | WBC | 0.919 | 36.900 | 4.411 | 1 vs. 2 |
| Mean corpuscular haemoglobin content | MCHC | 0.633 | 25.579 | 3.720 | 1 vs. 2 |
| Platelets | PLT | 0.597 | 47.374 | 2.966 | 1 vs. 2 |
| Mean corpuscular volume | MCV | 0.180 | 17.311 | 4.105 | 1 vs. 2 |
| Rectal temperature | T°C | 0.856 | 34.120 | 3.577 | 1 vs. 2 |
| Red blood cells | RBC | 0.033 | 62.830 | 3.756 | 1 vs. 2 |
| Packed cell volume | PCV | 0.054 | 83.890 | 3.813 | 1 vs. 2 |
| Haemoglobin concentration | Hb% | 0.016 | 3.603 | 4.931 | 1 vs. 2 |
| Mean corpuscular haemoglobin | MCH | 0.013 | 0.992 | 4.961 | 1 vs. 2 |
| Neutrophils | N | 0.879 | 1.553 | 4.923 | 1 vs. 2 |
| Leukocytes | L | 0.893 | 2.175 | 4.924 | 1 vs. 2 |
Legend: Tolerance, proportion of within-groups variance not accounted for by other variables in the analysis. F to remove, F-value of a variable included in the analysis if it was removed from the model; F to enter, F-value of a variable not included in the analysis if it was included in the model; the SPSS default thresholds for the F-to-enter and F-to-remove were adopted. Min D squared, Mahalanobis distance between the two closest groups. In our study, maximizing the minimum Mahalanobis distance was the variable selection rule while the statistical significance of the F-statistics was used as criterion to enter or remove the selected variables.
*Only data from the last step of the inclusion/exclusion process are presented.
Standardized discriminant function coefficients
| | ||
|---|---|---|
| T°C | -0.045 | -0.624 |
| PCV | -3.025 | -0.632 |
| RBC | 3.402 | 1.163 |
| MCV | 0.514 | 0.814 |
| MCHC | 0.259 | 0.567 |
| WBC | -0.272 | 0.540 |
| PLT | -0.183 | -0.834 |
RT Rectal Temperature, PCV Packed Cell Volume, RBC Red Blood Cells, MCV Mean Corpuscular Volume, MCHC Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Content, WBC White Blood Cells, PLT Platelets.
Figure 1Scatter plot of the coefficients for the two discriminant functions. Group centroids are indicated in red.
Results of allocation of "cases" according to breed groups
| | | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | 1 | 205 | 22 | 7 | 234 |
| 2 | 12 | 70 | 15 | 97 | |
| 3 | 10 | 6 | 88 | 104 | |
| % | 1 | 87.6 | 9.4 | 3 | 100 |
| 2 | 12.4 | 72.2 | 15.5 | 100 | |
| 3 | 9.6 | 5.8 | 84.6 | 100 | |
*83.4% of original grouped cases were correctly classified.