Literature DB >> 24053499

Quality of life following endoscopic endonasal resection of anterior skull base cancers.

Paolo Castelnuovo1, Davide Lepera, Mario Turri-Zanoni, Paolo Battaglia, Andrea Bolzoni Villaret, Maurizio Bignami, Piero Nicolai, Iacopo Dallan.   

Abstract

OBJECT: For several decades, the exclusive purpose in the management of anterior skull base malignancies has been to increase survival rates. Recently, given the improved prognosis achieved, more attention has been focused on quality of life (QOL) as well. Producing data on QOL in anterior skull base cancers is hampered by the rarity of the neoplasm and the lack of specific questionnaires. The purpose of this study was to assess health-related QOL in a large and homogeneous cohort of patients affected by anterior skull base cancers who had undergone endoscopic endonasal resection.
METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of patients treated for sinonasal and skull base cancers via an endoscopic endonasal approach at two Italian tertiary care referral centers. All patients were asked to complete the Anterior Skull Base Surgery Questionnaire to evaluate their QOL before and 1 month and 1 year after surgical treatment. To assess which parameters affect QOL, the study population was divided into subgroups according to age, sex, stage of disease, surgical approach, and adjuvant therapy.
RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three patients were enrolled in this study according to the adopted inclusion criteria. Overall QOL started at a score of 4.68 for the preoperative period, sharply decreased as far as a score of 4.03 during the 1st postoperative month, and rose again to a score of 4.59 over the course of 1 year after treatment, with a significant difference among the 3 values (p < 0.05). The specific symptoms and physical status domains registered poorer results at the 1-year assessment (4.00 and 4.71, respectively) than at the preoperative assessment (both domains 4.86), with a statistically significant reduction in scores (p < 0.05). Worse outcomes were associated with several variables: age > 60 years (difference of 0.21 points between the preoperative and 1-year period, p < 0.05), expanded surgical approaches with transnasal craniectomy (decrease of 0.20 points between the preoperative and 1-year period, p < 0.05), and postoperative radiotherapy (score of 4.53 at the 1-year period vs. 4.70 in patients without any adjuvant treatment, p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found when analyzing the study population according to sex (p > 0.1) and T classification of disease at presentation (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Radical endoscopic endonasal resection led to either complete or at least partial recovery of patient QOL within the 1st postoperative year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24053499     DOI: 10.3171/2013.8.JNS13296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  11 in total

Review 1.  Comprehensive review on rhino-neurosurgery.

Authors:  Werner Hosemann; Henry W S Schroeder
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

Review 2.  Endoscopic resection of sinonasal cancers.

Authors:  Shirley Y Su; Michael E Kupferman; Franco DeMonte; Nicholas B Levine; Shaan M Raza; Ehab Y Hanna
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Management of squamous cell carcinomas of the skull-base.

Authors:  Colin G Leonard; Vikram Padhye; Ian J Witterick
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Critical analysis of recurrences of esthesioneuroblastomas: can we prevent them?

Authors:  Marion Montava; Benjamin Verillaud; Romain Kania; Elisabeth Sauvaget; Damien Bresson; Julien Mancini; Sébastien Froelich; Philippe Herman
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Long-term outcomes of endoscopic endonasal approach for skull base surgery: a prospective study.

Authors:  Elena Rioja; Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen; Karla Enriquez; Joaquim Enseñat; Ricard Valero; Matteo de Notaris; Joaquim Mullol; Isam Alobid
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Specialised Surgical Instruments for Endoscopic and Endoscope-Assisted Neurosurgery: A Systematic Review of Safety, Efficacy and Usability.

Authors:  Holly Aylmore; Emmanouil Dimitrakakis; Joshua Carmichael; Danyal Z Khan; Danail Stoyanov; Neil L Dorward; Hani J Marcus
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  Preferences and Utilities for Health States after Treatment of Olfactory Groove Meningioma: Endoscopic versus Open.

Authors:  Christopher M Yao; Alyssa Kahane; Eric Monteiro; Fred Gentili; Gelareh Zadeh; John R de Almeida
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-02-17

Review 8.  Sinonasal carcinoma: clinical, pathological, genetic and therapeutic advances.

Authors:  José Luis Llorente; Fernando López; Carlos Suárez; Mario A Hermsen
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 9.  The Selective Role of Open and Endoscopic Approaches for Sinonasal Malignant Tumours.

Authors:  Fernando López; Jatin P Shah; Jonathan J Beitler; Carl H Snyderman; Valerie Lund; Cesare Piazza; Antti A Mäkitie; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; Juan P Rodrigo; Luiz P Kowalski; Miquel Quer; Ashok Shaha; Akihiro Homma; Alvaro Sanabria; Renata Ferrarotto; Anne W M Lee; Victor H F Lee; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.070

10.  Septal flip flap for anterior skull base reconstruction after endoscopic resection of sinonasal cancers: preliminary outcomes.

Authors:  P Battaglia; M Turri-Zanoni; F De Bernardi; P Dehgani Mobaraki; A Karligkiotis; F Leone; P Castelnuovo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.