Literature DB >> 24053497

Effect of dural detachment on long-term tumor control for meningiomas treated using Simpson grade IV resection.

Yuta Fukushima1, Soichi Oya, Hirofumi Nakatomi, Junji Shibahara, Shunya Hanakita, Shota Tanaka, Masahiro Shin, Kensuke Kawai, Masashi Fukayama, Nobuhito Saito.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Meningiomas treated by subtotal or partial resection are associated with significantly shorter recurrence-free survival than those treated by gross-total resection. The Simpson grading system classifies incomplete resections into a single category, namely Simpson Grade IV, with wide variations in the volume and location of residual tumors, making it complicated to evaluate the achievement of surgical goals and predict the prognosis of these tumors. Authors of the present study investigated the factors related to necessity of retreatment and tried to identify any surgical nuances achievable with the aid of modern neurosurgical techniques for meningiomas treated using Simpson Grade IV resection.
METHODS: This retrospective analysis included patients with WHO Grade I meningiomas treated using Simpson Grade IV resection as the initial therapy at the University of Tokyo Hospital between January 1995 and April 2010. Retreatment was defined as reresection or stereotactic radiosurgery due to postoperative tumor growth.
RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were included in this study. Regrowth of residual tumor was observed in 22 patients with a mean follow-up period of 6.1 years. Retreatment was performed for 20 of these 22 tumors with regrowth. Risk factors related to significantly shorter retreatment-free survival were age younger than 50 years (p = 0.006), postresection tumor volume of 4 cm(3) or more (p = 0.016), no dural detachment (p = 0.001), and skull base location (p = 0.016). Multivariate analysis revealed that no dural detachment (hazard ratio [HR] 6.42, 95% CI 1.41-45.0; p = 0.02) and skull base location (HR 11.6, 95% CI 2.18-218; p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for the necessity of early retreatment, whereas postresection tumor volume of 4 cm(3) or more was not a statistically significant risk factor.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with Simpson Grade I, II, and III resections, Simpson Grade IV resection includes highly heterogeneous tumors in terms of resection rate and location of the residual mass. Despite the difficulty in analyzing such diverse data, these results draw attention to the favorable effect of dural detachment (instead of maximizing the resection rate) on long-term tumor control. Surgical strategy with an emphasis on detaching the tumor from the affected dura might be another important option in resection of high-risk meningiomas not amenable to gross-total resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24053497     DOI: 10.3171/2013.8.JNS13832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  8 in total

1.  Simpson grade IV resections of skull base meningiomas: does the postoperative tumor volume impact progression?

Authors:  Benjamin Brokinkel; Walter Stummer; Peter Sporns
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  The Simpson grading in meningioma surgery: does the tumor location influence the prognostic value?

Authors:  Kira Marie Voß; Dorothee Cäcilia Spille; Cristina Sauerland; Eric Suero Molina; Caroline Brokinkel; Werner Paulus; Walter Stummer; Markus Holling; Astrid Jeibmann; Benjamin Brokinkel
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Residual Tumor Volume and Tumor Progression after Subtotal Resection and Observation of WHO Grade I Skull Base Meningiomas.

Authors:  Colin J Przybylowski; Benjamin K Hendricks; Charuta G Furey; Joseph D DiDomenico; Randall W Porter; Nader Sanai; Kaith K Almefty; Andrew S Little
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-09-09

4.  A Novel Scoring System Based on Preoperative Routine Blood Test in Predicting Prognosis of Atypical Meningioma.

Authors:  Xiaoyong Chen; Guojun Wang; Jianhe Zhang; Gaoqi Zhang; Yuanxiang Lin; Zhangya Lin; Jianjun Gu; Dezhi Kang; Chenyu Ding
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  The Simpson Grading: Is It Still Valid?

Authors:  Silky Chotai; Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Clinical significance of NF2 alteration in grade I meningiomas revisited; prognostic impact integrated with extent of resection, tumour location, and Ki-67 index.

Authors:  Yu Teranishi; Atsushi Okano; Satoru Miyawaki; Kenta Ohara; Daiichiro Ishigami; Hiroki Hongo; Shogo Dofuku; Hirokazu Takami; Jun Mitsui; Masako Ikemura; Daisuke Komura; Hiroto Katoh; Tetsuo Ushiku; Shumpei Ishikawa; Masahiro Shin; Hirofumi Nakatomi; Nobuhito Saito
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol Commun       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 7.578

7.  Is Simpson grade I removal necessary in all cases of spinal meningioma? Assessment of postoperative recurrence during long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Kyoji Tsuda; Hiroyoshi Akutsu; Tetsuya Yamamoto; Kei Nakai; Eiichi Ishikawa; Akira Matsumura
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 8.  Current Status of Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Skull Base Meningiomas: Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Masahiro Shin; Kenji Kondo; Nobuhito Saito
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 1.742

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.