| Literature DB >> 24052882 |
B Unnikrishnan1, Vinita Jagannath, John T Ramapuram, B Achappa, D Madi.
Abstract
Background. Depression is one of the most prevalent psychiatric diagnoses seen in HIV-positive individuals. Women with HIV are about four times more likely to be depressed than those who are not infected. Aims. To assess the sociodemographic and clinical correlates of depression among women living with HIV/AIDS. Setting and Design. One public and one private hospital in Mangalore, Coastal South India, and cross-sectional design. Methods and Materials. Study constituted of 137 HIV-positive women, depression was assessed using BDI (Beck Depression Inventory), and social support was assessed using Lubben Social Network Scale. Statistical Analysis. All analysis was conducted using SPSS version 11.5. Chi-square test with P value less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results. Among 137 HIV-positive women, 51.1% were depressed. Around 16% were having moderate to high risk for isolation. Depression was statistically significant in rural women, widowed women, and lower socioeconomic class women. Conclusion. Depression is highly prevalent among women living with HIV which is still underdiagnosed and undertreated, and there is a need to incorporate mental health services as an integral component of HIV care.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 24052882 PMCID: PMC3767188 DOI: 10.5402/2012/684972
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISRN AIDS ISSN: 2090-939X
| Score | Severity of depression |
|---|---|
| 0–9 | Normal |
| 10–16 | Mild depression |
| 17–29 | Moderate depression |
| 30–63 | Severe depression |
| Score | Risk of isolation |
|---|---|
| <20 | Isolated |
| 21–25 | High risk for isolation |
| 26–30 | Moderate risk for isolation |
| ≥31 | Low risk for isolation |
Baseline characteristics of study population (n = 137).
| Characteristics | BDI score |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not depressed | Depressed | ||
| Residence | |||
| Urban | 43 (66.2%) | 22 (33.8%) | <0.001 |
| Rural | 24 (33.3%) | 48 (66.7%) | |
| Marital status | |||
| Single | 15 (68.2%) | 7 (31.8%) | <0.001 |
| Married | 46 (55.4%) | 37 (44.6%) | |
| Widowed | 6 (18.8%) | 26 (81.3%) | |
| Religion | |||
| Hindu | 52 (47.3%) | 58 (52.7%) | 0.54 |
| Muslim | 3 (42.9%) | 4 (57.1%) | |
| Christian | 12 (60 %) | 8 (40%) | |
| Mode of transmission | |||
| Sexual | 55 (50%) | 55 (50%) | 0.417 |
| Blood | 7 (36.8%) | 12 (63.2%) | |
| Other | 5 (62.5%) | 3 (37.5%) | |
| Time since diagnosis | |||
| <5 years | 39 (43.8%) | 50 (56.2%) | 0.075 |
| >5 years | 28 (58.3%) | 20 (41.7%) | |
| Antiretroviral treatment (Art) | |||
| On art | 25 (50%) | 25 (50%) | 0.493 |
| Not on art | 42 (48.3%) | 45 (51.7%) | |
| Socioeconomic status (Ses) | |||
| Middle Ses | 36 (75%) | 12 (25%) | <0.001 |
| Lower Ses | 31 (34.8%) | 58 (65.2%) | |
| CD4 group | |||
| <250 | 27 (55.1%) | 27 (44.9%) | 0.183 |
| >250 | 40 (45.5%) | 48 (54.5%) | |
∗ P value less than 0.05 taken as statistically significant.
Assessment of depression and social support.
| Parameters |
| % |
|---|---|---|
| Depression | ||
| Not depressed (∗BDI score 0–9) | 67 | 48.9% |
| Depressed (∗BDI score 10–63) | 70 | 51.1% |
| Social support | ||
| High risk for isolation (#LSNS score 21–25) | 15 | 10.9% |
| Moderate risk for isolation (#LSNS score 26–30) | 7 | 5.1% |
| Low risk for isolation (#LSNS score ≥31) | 115 | 84% |
∗BDI: Beck Depression Inventory.
#LSNS: Lubben Social Network Scale.
Comparison of depression and social support.
| Parameters | Depression |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not depressed | Depressed | ||
| Social support | |||
| High risk for isolation | 6 (40%) | 9 (60%) | 0.71 |
| Moderate risk for isolation | 3 (42.9%) | 4 (57.1%) | |
| Low risk for isolation | 58 (50.4%) | 57 (49.6%) | |
∗ P value less than 0.05 taken as statistically significant.