Literature DB >> 24052726

Detecting Sex-Biased Gene Flow in African-Americans through the Analysis of Intra- and Inter-Population Variation at Mitochondrial DNA and Y- Chromosome Microsatellites.

C Battaggia1, P Anagnostou, I Bosch, F Brisighelli, G Destro-Bisol, M Capocasa.   

Abstract

This study reports on variations at the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) hypervariable region 1 (HVR-1) and at seven Y-chromosome microsatellites in an African-American population sample from Chicago, IL, USA. Our results support the hypothesis that the population studied had undergone a European male-biased gene flow. We show that comparisons of intra-and inter-population diversity parameters between African-Americans, Europeans and Africans may help detect sex-biased gene flow, providing a complement to quantitative methods to estimate genetic admixture.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Admixture; African-Americans; Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA); Sex-biased gene flow; Y-chromosome

Year:  2012        PMID: 24052726      PMCID: PMC3776662          DOI: 10.2478/bjmg-2013-0001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Balkan J Med Genet        ISSN: 1311-0160            Impact factor:   0.519


INTRODUCTION

The European contribution to the gene pool of African populations deported to the United States of America in the course of the Atlantic slave trade may be regarded to as a paradigmatic case of gene flow in human populations [1,2]. Coherently, studies of genetic structure of present day African-Americans have attracted a particular interest in molecular anthropology [3]. The earliest investigations based on protein loci estimated a 4.0–30.0% proportion of European genes in African-Americans, pointing to a higher admixture in northern rather than in southern US regions [6]. More recent studies, based on autosomal DNA polymorphisms, highlighted the level of admixture for northern US populations to be lower than previously thought, and the lack of a close relationship between latitude and extent of European admixtures [7]. The introduction of uni linear DNA polymorphisms of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and non recombining portions of Y-chromosome, has made it possible to separately study the male and female European contribution to the African-American gene pool [7-9]. Finally, further refinements have been obtained with the introduction of genome wide approaches [10,11]. In a previous study, we used 10 autosomal microsatellites and an Alu polymorphism to explore the genetic structure of an African-American population from Chicago, IL, USA [12]. In this study, we analyzed the variation at the mtDNA hypervariable region 1 (HVR-1) and at seven microsatellites of the Y-chromosome in the same population sample. Using a broad population dataset, we showed that comparisons of intra- and inter-population diversity parameters between African-Americans, Europeans and Africans may help detect sex-biased gene flow, providing a complement to quantitative methods to estimate genetic admixtures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 50 individuals (23 males and 27 females) was available for this study. Appropriate informed consent was obtained from all individuals participating in the study. Sequencing of the HVR-1 of mtDNA from nucleotide (nt) positions 16024 to 16383, and determination of size variations at loci DYS19, DYS389I, DYS389II, DYS390, DYS391, DYS392 and DYS393, was performed as previously described [13,14]. The amplified products were analyzed in polyacrylamide denaturing gels using a semi-automated DNA sequencer (A.L.F. express; Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). Allelic and internal standards were used for microsatellite typing. The dataset for comparison was built selecting data from the mtDNA and Y-chromosomal literature for European and 10 African populations. We have preferentially used widely dispersed populations which could have contributed to the gene pool of present day African-Americans and/or have not undergone drift events in their evolutionary history (Supplementary Table 1). Moreover, data for four African-American samples were considered [15-17]. Parameters of intra-population diversity [haplotype diversity (HD) and mean number of pairwise differences (MNPD)] and genetic distances between populations were calculated using the Arlequin software ver. 3.5 [18]. Given the relatively high differentiation expected between African and European haplotypes, molecular methods were used in addition to the haplotypic ones to detect further signatures of admixture.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Mitochondrial DNA and Y-Chromosomal Variation. DNA sequences of the HVR-1 were determined in 50 unrelated individuals (Table 1). We found nucleotide differences at 63 out of 360 positions with respect to the ‘consensus’ sequence [19], five of which were transversions [16114 (A>C); 16183 (A>C); 16188 (C>G); 16258 (T>A)]. In total, we were able to define 40 different lineages, with frequencies ranging from 0.002 to 0.008. We obtained a HD value of 0.987 ± 0.008 and a MNPD value of 7.673 ± 3.637.
Table 1

Variable nucleotide positions of the HVR1 of mtDNA control region in 50 African American samples compared to the Cambridge reference sequence. The “i” stands for insertion.

Y-Chromosomal haplotypes, built using seven microsatellite loci, were determined in 23 individuals (Table 2). Nineteen different haplotypes were observed, with frequencies ranging from 0.042 to 0.125. We obtained a HD value of 0.996 ± 0.014 and a MNPD value of 4.383 ±2.246.
Table 2

Seven loci Y chromosome haplotype frequencies in 23 African-American subjects.

SampleNumber of HaplotypesDYS19DYS389IDYS389IIDYS390DYS391DYS392DYS393Frequency (%)Standard Deviations
AA012171431211011150.08700.0601
AA023161330211011140.13040.0718
AA031141329241013130.04350.0435
AA041151433211011130.04350.0435
AA051161431251011130.04350.0435
AA061141228251011130.04350.0435
AA071151432211011130.04350.0435
AA101141228241113130.04350.0435
AA111151431211010130.04350.0435
AA121171330211111150.04350.0435
AA131151330221013130.04350.0435
AA141141329241113140.04350.0435
AA161141228221011130.04350.0435
AA171171431201011140.04350.0435
AA181151227231014130.04350.0435
AA192151331211011130.08700.0601
AA221141430241113130.04350.0435
AA2231141330241113130.04350.0435
AA241141228231011130.04350.0435
Intra- and Inter-population Diversity in African-American and African Populations. Since the seminal work by [20], the approach based on the simultaneous use of mtDNA and Y-chromosomal polymorphisms has been used in numerous studies of human genetic diversity [21]. This approach may also turn out to be useful in the case of African-American populations. In fact, the availability of uni linear DNA polymorphisms offers the opportunity to detect possible signatures of a sex-biased gene flow from Europeans to African-Americans. Intriguingly, whereas a male-biased gene flow was expected on the basis of historical knowledge, demographic data indicate that since 1960, most of the mixed marriages involved African-American males to females of European origin [22]. In a study carried out among African-American students at the Texas University at Austin, Austin, TX, USA, Hsieh and Sutton [23] compared admixture estimates based on mtDNA and protein loci, concluding that there is no evidence of a European male-biased gene flow. On the other hand, the latter case was supported by more recent studies carried out in a number of African-American populations from different areas and based on population specific mtDNA and Y-chromosome alleles [7-10]. Estimates of sex-specific admixture suffer from two different orders of limitations. Obtaining reliable African parental populations is difficult for three main reasons. First, present day African-Americans originate from populations scattered in a wide area from the central and western parts of the continent. Second, it is tricky to identify the populations in continuity with those from which slaves were taken to the US, as their demography was reshaped by slave capture and forced migrations [24]. Third, there is also substantial variation among sub-Saharan groups for mtDNA and Y-chromosome polymorphisms [25,26], so that results may vary substantially depending on the populations chosen as the parental ones. A further source of confusion may be created by geneticists and molecular anthropologists when they use inaccurate ethnolinguistic labels and/or assume particular populations as representative of wider groups [27]. The second considerable problem is in the large statistical uncertainty of admixture estimates based on mtDNA and Y-chromosome polymorphisms. Given their intrinsic nature of single loci in evolutionary terms, both the uni linearly transmitted genetic systems generally produce values with extended confidence intervals that substantially overlap (e.g., see estimates for Maryland, Texas and Virginia of table 5 in [9]). A possible approach is represented by the search for possible effects of gene flow on intra- and inter-population genetic variation. Since the two genetic systems cannot be directly compared due to substantial difference in types and rate of mutations and demographic dynamics, we have compiled a paired mtDNA and Y-chromosomal population database including both European and African populations [25,28]. This makes it possible to compare the extent of mtDNA and Y-chromosome variation within a given population, by contrasting it with data from other populations included in the database. An incoming European male-biased gene flow predicts a greater ratio of Y-chromosome to mtDNA diversity for African-Americans than for African populations. This expectation is met by our African-American sample. In fact, their mtDNA HD is equal or lower than in five African populations, whereas their Y-chromosomal value is higher (Table 3). The greater diversity of African-Americans is even more evident comparing MNPD, a measure which weighs molecular differences. In this case, the diversity between Europeans and Africans may have a greater impact than happens with HD, in which the extent of inter-haplotypic differentiation is not taken into account. In fact, there are eight African populations with a mtDNA MNPD higher than our African-Americans, and only one for the Y-chromosomal polymorphisms. It is noteworthy that the latter case involves the Fulbe, a population which has been shown to have undergone a male-biased gene flow due to African migrations [29]. Although no inference on asymmetric gene flow can be made for other African-American populations, it is remarkable that the ratio between molecular and haplotypic measures of intra-population diversity are the lowest for mtDNA and the highest for Y-chromosome polymorphisms (Figure 1).
Table 3

Haplotype and molecular intra-population diversity measurement in African-Americans and Africans. Mitochondrial DNA estimates refer to nucleotide positions 16090 to 16365. Y-chromosome estimates refer to the five loci haplotypes (DYS389I, DYS3910, DYS391, DYS392 and DYS393).

mtDNAY-Chromosome
nHD (SE)MNPD (SE)MNPD/HDnHD (SE)MNPD (SE)MNPD/HD
African-Americans 1AA1500.984 (0.009)7.291 (3.471)7.410230.976 (0.0201)2.818 (1.543)2.887
African-Americans 2AA22300.993 (0.002)7667 (3.587)7.7211060.978 (0.0045)2.839 (1.508)2.902
African-Americans 3AA3780.987 (0.006)6.651 (3.173)6.7394260.984 (0.0022)3.034 (1.584)3.082
BakakaBAK500.983 (0.008)9.457 (4.414)9.620490.796 (0.0270)1.232 (0.796)1.548
BamilekeBAM480.988 (0.007)7.869 (3.725)7.965500.850 (0.0375)1.875 (1.091)2.207
BassaBAS460.991 (0.007)9.194 (4.306)9.277490.843 (0.0355)1.764 (1.040)2.093
BetiBET480.965 (0.012)8.395 (3.955)8.699360.916 (0.0232)1.738 (1.035)1.898
CabindaCAB1100.988 (0.003)8.960 (4.159)9.069720.900 (0.0168)1.993 (1.138)2.215
EwondoEWO530.983 (0.008)9.666 (4.500)9.833390.804 (0.0449)1.505 (0.926)1.871
FulbeFUL340.975 (0.016)6.460 (3.134)6.626270.946 (0.0253)2.644 (1.456)2.795
Guinea BissauGUB3720.985 (0.002)7.466 (3.496)7.5801620.937 (0.0110)2.183 (1.215)2.330
MozambiqueMOZ1070.967 (0.007)8.216 (3.839)8.4961120.907 (0.0152)1.975 (1.125)2.177
NgoumbaNGO440.984 (0.007)8.798 (4.137)8.941360.929 (0.209)2.324 (1.301)2.502

HD: haplotype diversity; SE: standard error; MNPD: mean number of pairwise differences.

Figure 1

Scatterplots of MNPD and HD values for mtDNA and Y-chromosomes in the populations under study. Abbreviations are given in Table 3. Dotted lines indicate the 95.0% confidence interval for the regression line obtained for African populations.

A male-biased gene flow in African-Americans from Chicago, IL, USA is also supported by the analysis of genetic distances (Table 4). They show the lowest genetic distance (both molecular and haplotypic from Europeans for Y-chromosomal polymorphisms but not for the mtDNA ones. Furthermore, the ratio of mtDNA to Y-chromosomal genetic distances from Europeans is markedly higher (18.3–38.3% for molecular and haplotypic distances, respectively) than all African groups. The introgression of Y-chromosomes into other African-American populations is consistent with their comparatively low genetic distance from Europeans.
Table 4

Average genetic distances of Africans and African-Americans from Europeans.

Molecular DistancesHaplotype Distances
mtDNAY Chrom.mt/YmtDNAY Chrom.mt/Y
African-Americans 1AA10.2190.2810.7790.0270.0240.151
BakakaBAK0.2400.6240.3850.0280.1200.232
BamilekeBAM0.2670.4560.5850.0250.0950.270
BassaBAS0.2660.5980.4450.0240.0980.241
BetiBET0.3120.4770.6530.0360.0580.624
CabindaCAB0.2500.4350.5750.0250.0660.374
EwondoEWO0.2780.5280.5270.0280.1140.244
FulbeFUL0.1980.3990.4960.0320.0380.832
Guinea BissauGUB0.1840.5600.3280.0260.0520.501
MozambiqueMOZ0.2540.4150.6120.0350.0670.528
NgoumbaNGO0.2480.3770.6590.0250.0580.427
To sum up, our results coherently support the hypothesis that the African-American sample under study has undergone a European male-biased gene flow. On a more general note, our research showed that comparative analysis of intra- and inter-population variation for Y-chromosome and mtDNA polymorphisms in a broad dataset including African and Europeans groups, may help detect admixture signatures, providing a useful complement to methods for admixture estimates.
  25 in total

1.  Estimating European admixture in African Americans by using microsatellites and a microsatellite haplotype (CD4/Alu).

Authors:  G Destro-Bisol; R Maviglia; A Caglià; I Boschi; G Spedini; V Pascali; A Clark; S Tishkoff
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  A back migration from Asia to sub-Saharan Africa is supported by high-resolution analysis of human Y-chromosome haplotypes.

Authors:  Fulvio Cruciani; Piero Santolamazza; Peidong Shen; Vincent Macaulay; Pedro Moral; Antonel Olckers; David Modiano; Susan Holmes; Giovanni Destro-Bisol; Valentina Coia; Douglas C Wallace; Peter J Oefner; Antonio Torroni; L Luca Cavalli-Sforza; Rosaria Scozzari; Peter A Underhill
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-03-21       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Y chromosome STR haplotypes and the genetic structure of U.S. populations of African, European, and Hispanic ancestry.

Authors:  Manfred Kayser; Silke Brauer; Hiltrud Schädlich; Mechthild Prinz; Mark A Batzer; Peter A Zimmerman; B A Boatin; Mark Stoneking
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  The analysis of variation of mtDNA hypervariable region 1 suggests that Eastern and Western Pygmies diverged before the Bantu expansion.

Authors:  Giovanni Destro-Bisol; Valentina Coia; Ilaria Boschi; Fabio Verginelli; Alessandra Cagliá; Vincenzo Pascali; Gabriella Spedini; Francesc Calafell
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-01-16       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  The African diaspora: mitochondrial DNA and the Atlantic slave trade.

Authors:  Antonio Salas; Martin Richards; María-Victoria Lareu; Rosaria Scozzari; Alfredo Coppa; Antonio Torroni; Vincent Macaulay; Angel Carracedo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Evidence of high genetic variation among linguistically diverse populations on a micro-geographic scale: a case study of the Italian Alps.

Authors:  Valentina Coia; Ilaria Boschi; Federica Trombetta; Fabio Cavulli; Francesco Montinaro; Giovanni Destro-Bisol; Stefano Grimaldi; Annaluisa Pedrotti
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.172

7.  The genetic structure and history of Africans and African Americans.

Authors:  Sarah A Tishkoff; Floyd A Reed; Françoise R Friedlaender; Christopher Ehret; Alessia Ranciaro; Alain Froment; Jibril B Hirbo; Agnes A Awomoyi; Jean-Marie Bodo; Ogobara Doumbo; Muntaser Ibrahim; Abdalla T Juma; Maritha J Kotze; Godfrey Lema; Jason H Moore; Holly Mortensen; Thomas B Nyambo; Sabah A Omar; Kweli Powell; Gideon S Pretorius; Michael W Smith; Mahamadou A Thera; Charles Wambebe; James L Weber; Scott M Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Genetic evidence for a higher female migration rate in humans.

Authors:  M T Seielstad; E Minch; L L Cavalli-Sforza
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Y chromosome lineages in men of west African descent.

Authors:  Jada Benn Torres; Menahem B Doura; Shomarka O Y Keita; Rick A Kittles
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  African-American mitochondrial DNAs often match mtDNAs found in multiple African ethnic groups.

Authors:  Bert Ely; Jamie Lee Wilson; Fatimah Jackson; Bruce A Jackson
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 7.431

View more
  1 in total

1.  A continuum of admixture in the Western Hemisphere revealed by the African Diaspora genome.

Authors:  Rasika Ann Mathias; Margaret A Taub; Christopher R Gignoux; Wenqing Fu; Shaila Musharoff; Timothy D O'Connor; Candelaria Vergara; Dara G Torgerson; Maria Pino-Yanes; Suyash S Shringarpure; Lili Huang; Nicholas Rafaels; Meher Preethi Boorgula; Henry Richard Johnston; Victor E Ortega; Albert M Levin; Wei Song; Raul Torres; Badri Padhukasahasram; Celeste Eng; Delmy-Aracely Mejia-Mejia; Trevor Ferguson; Zhaohui S Qin; Alan F Scott; Maria Yazdanbakhsh; James G Wilson; Javier Marrugo; Leslie A Lange; Rajesh Kumar; Pedro C Avila; L Keoki Williams; Harold Watson; Lorraine B Ware; Christopher Olopade; Olufunmilayo Olopade; Ricardo Oliveira; Carole Ober; Dan L Nicolae; Deborah Meyers; Alvaro Mayorga; Jennifer Knight-Madden; Tina Hartert; Nadia N Hansel; Marilyn G Foreman; Jean G Ford; Mezbah U Faruque; Georgia M Dunston; Luis Caraballo; Esteban G Burchard; Eugene Bleecker; Maria Ilma Araujo; Edwin Francisco Herrera-Paz; Kimberly Gietzen; Wendy E Grus; Michael Bamshad; Carlos D Bustamante; Eimear E Kenny; Ryan D Hernandez; Terri H Beaty; Ingo Ruczinski; Joshua Akey; Kathleen C Barnes
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 14.919

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.