INTRODUCTION: Nicotine interacts with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) and modifies neuronal functions. The net result of nicotine exposure is difficult to assess because multiple nAChR subtypes exist and are expressed on multiple classes of neurons. Nicotine, unlike the natural agonist acetylcholine, remains in tissues for hours, and during this extended exposure nAChRs desensitize. Therefore, agonists can block the natural functions of nAChRs. Higher nicotine concentrations are required to desensitize α4β2-nAChRs containing the α5 subunit. The aim of these experiments was to determine if this property holds true for compounds other than nicotine. METHODS: [(3)H]-dopamine release from crude mouse striatal synaptosomal preparations was used to measure activation and desensitization of the [(α4β2)2β2] and [(α4β2)2α5] nAChR subtypes. Affinity was measured by competition with [(125)I]-epibatidine. RESULTS: Nine compounds of varying affinity and efficacy were tested. All compounds partially desensitized both subtypes; concentration necessary for desensitization correlated with binding site affinity but not efficacy. All compounds showed a similar, significant shift in concentration necessary for a 50% effect when the α5 subunit was included (averaging 8-fold higher). The extent of desensitization produced by a 10-min exposure did not correlate with affinity or efficacy of compound. CONCLUSION: Full or partial nicotinic agonists used as medications may effectively desensitize α4β2-nAChRs. However, significantly higher concentrations of all compounds tested were required to elicit desensitization of α4α5β2-nAChRs than α4β2-nAChRs. If desensitization is the important property for a smoking cessation drug, basic screening at both subtypes may provide a mechanistic foundation for effectiveness.
INTRODUCTION:Nicotine interacts with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) and modifies neuronal functions. The net result of nicotine exposure is difficult to assess because multiple nAChR subtypes exist and are expressed on multiple classes of neurons. Nicotine, unlike the natural agonist acetylcholine, remains in tissues for hours, and during this extended exposure nAChRs desensitize. Therefore, agonists can block the natural functions of nAChRs. Higher nicotine concentrations are required to desensitize α4β2-nAChRs containing the α5 subunit. The aim of these experiments was to determine if this property holds true for compounds other than nicotine. METHODS:[(3)H]-dopamine release from crude mouse striatal synaptosomal preparations was used to measure activation and desensitization of the [(α4β2)2β2] and [(α4β2)2α5] nAChR subtypes. Affinity was measured by competition with [(125)I]-epibatidine. RESULTS: Nine compounds of varying affinity and efficacy were tested. All compounds partially desensitized both subtypes; concentration necessary for desensitization correlated with binding site affinity but not efficacy. All compounds showed a similar, significant shift in concentration necessary for a 50% effect when the α5 subunit was included (averaging 8-fold higher). The extent of desensitization produced by a 10-min exposure did not correlate with affinity or efficacy of compound. CONCLUSION: Full or partial nicotinic agonists used as medications may effectively desensitize α4β2-nAChRs. However, significantly higher concentrations of all compounds tested were required to elicit desensitization of α4α5β2-nAChRs than α4β2-nAChRs. If desensitization is the important property for a smoking cessation drug, basic screening at both subtypes may provide a mechanistic foundation for effectiveness.
Authors: Carlos Fonck; Bruce N Cohen; Raad Nashmi; Paul Whiteaker; Daniel A Wagenaar; Nivalda Rodrigues-Pinguet; Purnima Deshpande; Sheri McKinney; Steven Kwoh; Jose Munoz; Cesar Labarca; Allan C Collins; Michael J Marks; Henry A Lester Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2005-12-07 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Arthur L Brody; Mark A Mandelkern; Edythe D London; Richard E Olmstead; Judah Farahi; David Scheibal; Jennifer Jou; Valerie Allen; Emmanuelle Tiongson; Svetlana I Chefer; Andrei O Koren; Alexey G Mukhin Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2006-08
Authors: M E Jarvik; D C Madsen; R E Olmstead; P N Iwamoto-Schaap; J L Elins; N L Benowitz Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Hélène M Faessel; Megan A Gibbs; David J Clark; Kevin Rohrbacher; Marilyn Stolar; Aaron H Burstein Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Beryl Y T Chung; Warren Bignell; Derek L Jacklin; Boyer D Winters; Craig D C Bailey Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 2.714