Literature DB >> 24052283

Biomedical publishing. Secretive and subjective, peer review proves resistant to study.

Jennifer Couzin-Frankel.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 24052283     DOI： 10.1126/science.341.6152.1331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN： 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Streamlined research funding using short proposals and accelerated peer review: an observational study.

Authors:  Adrian G Barnett; Danielle L Herbert; Megan Campbell; Naomi Daly; Jason A Roberts; Alison Mudge; Nicholas Graves
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  With great power comes great responsibility: the importance of rejection, power, and editors in the practice of scientific publishing.

Authors:  Christopher J Lortie; Stefano Allesina; Lonnie Aarssen; Olyana Grod; Amber E Budden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Fragments of peer review: A quantitative analysis of the literature (1969-2015).

Authors:  Francisco Grimaldo; Ana Marušić; Flaminio Squazzoni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.