Stefano Mazzoleni1, Patrizio Sale, Micol Tiboni, Marco Franceschini, Maria Chiara Carrozza, Federico Posteraro. 1. From The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy (SM, MCC); Department of Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy (PS, MF); and Neurological Rehabilitation and Brain Injury Unit, Auxilium Vitae Rehabilitation Center, Volterra, Italy (MT, FP).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare motor recovery in subacute and chronic stroke patients through clinical assessment scales and a set of kinematic parameters recorded using a robotic system. DESIGN: Fifty post-stroke patients, 25 subacute and 25 chronic, and 20 healthy subjects participated in this study. The InMotion 2.0 robotic system for shoulder/elbow rehabilitation was used. Clinical outcome measures were used for assessment. Kinematic parameters related to the speed measured at the robot's end effector and to the movement's smoothness were computed. RESULTS: The results of this study show that the robot-assisted training can contribute to reduce motor impairment in both subacute and chronic stroke patients. The evaluation of the kinematic parameters and their correlation with the clinical scales highlight some differences in mechanisms of recovery in subacute and chronic stroke patients. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed set of kinematic parameters and the analysis of the reaching movements' onset time, associated with a quantitative evaluation of motor improvement provided by the clinical outcome measures, are also able to quantify the changes in the quality of motion obtained after robot-assisted therapy in stroke patients. The higher gain in the subacute stroke patients suggests that the rehabilitative treatment provided at an earlier stage is able to avoid the development of pathologic patterns, resulting in a better quality of motion.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare motor recovery in subacute and chronic strokepatients through clinical assessment scales and a set of kinematic parameters recorded using a robotic system. DESIGN: Fifty post-strokepatients, 25 subacute and 25 chronic, and 20 healthy subjects participated in this study. The InMotion 2.0 robotic system for shoulder/elbow rehabilitation was used. Clinical outcome measures were used for assessment. Kinematic parameters related to the speed measured at the robot's end effector and to the movement's smoothness were computed. RESULTS: The results of this study show that the robot-assisted training can contribute to reduce motor impairment in both subacute and chronic strokepatients. The evaluation of the kinematic parameters and their correlation with the clinical scales highlight some differences in mechanisms of recovery in subacute and chronic strokepatients. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed set of kinematic parameters and the analysis of the reaching movements' onset time, associated with a quantitative evaluation of motor improvement provided by the clinical outcome measures, are also able to quantify the changes in the quality of motion obtained after robot-assisted therapy in strokepatients. The higher gain in the subacute strokepatients suggests that the rehabilitative treatment provided at an earlier stage is able to avoid the development of pathologic patterns, resulting in a better quality of motion.
Authors: Abel Torres-Espín; Juan Forero; Keith K Fenrich; Ana M Lucas-Osma; Aleksandra Krajacic; Emma Schmidt; Romana Vavrek; Pamela Raposo; David J Bennett; Phillip G Popovich; Karim Fouad Journal: Brain Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Tijana J Dimkić Tomić; Andrej M Savić; Aleksandra S Vidaković; Sindi Z Rodić; Milica S Isaković; Cristina Rodríguez-de-Pablo; Thierry Keller; Ljubica M Konstantinović Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 3.411