BACKGROUND: Cardiac dysfunction occurs in up to 80% of patients with septic shock. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is an ideal tool for the detailed characterization of cardiac function. Its feasibility is perceived to be poor in critically ill patients, but this has never been studied. To address this question, the authors evaluated the efficacy of TTE to diagnose heart failure in septic shock. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit with septic shock and who had a TTE within 72 hours of intensive care unit admission were identified by a computer algorithm and validated by chart review. Echocardiography images were reviewed by a single cardiologist blinded to clinical outcomes. Clinical information was collected from patients' medical record. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients met the studies' inclusion criteria. The feasibility of TTE to calculate left ventricular ejection fraction was 90% and to assess diastolic function was 74%. Significant mitral regurgitation or aortic stenosis was the most frequent impediments for the assessment of diastolic function. Seventy-four percent of all patients showed some type of cardiac dysfunction (left or right ventricular systolic dysfunction and/or left ventricular diastolic dysfunction). In regression analyses, TTE feasibility was not impacted by factors previously associated with poor image acquisition: high body mass index, mechanical ventilation, tachycardia, advanced age or high severity of illness. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that TTE is a useful tool to assess myocardial function in critically ill patients and suggested its potential to assist in the management of patients with septic shock.
BACKGROUND:Cardiac dysfunction occurs in up to 80% of patients with septic shock. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is an ideal tool for the detailed characterization of cardiac function. Its feasibility is perceived to be poor in critically illpatients, but this has never been studied. To address this question, the authors evaluated the efficacy of TTE to diagnose heart failure in septic shock. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit with septic shock and who had a TTE within 72 hours of intensive care unit admission were identified by a computer algorithm and validated by chart review. Echocardiography images were reviewed by a single cardiologist blinded to clinical outcomes. Clinical information was collected from patients' medical record. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients met the studies' inclusion criteria. The feasibility of TTE to calculate left ventricular ejection fraction was 90% and to assess diastolic function was 74%. Significant mitral regurgitation or aortic stenosis was the most frequent impediments for the assessment of diastolic function. Seventy-four percent of all patients showed some type of cardiac dysfunction (left or right ventricular systolic dysfunction and/or left ventricular diastolic dysfunction). In regression analyses, TTE feasibility was not impacted by factors previously associated with poor image acquisition: high body mass index, mechanical ventilation, tachycardia, advanced age or high severity of illness. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that TTE is a useful tool to assess myocardial function in critically illpatients and suggested its potential to assist in the management of patients with septic shock.
Authors: Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack S Shanewise; Scott D Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William J Stewart Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Caroline Etchecopar-Chevreuil; Bruno François; Marc Clavel; Nicolas Pichon; Hervé Gastinne; Philippe Vignon Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Vincent Caille; Cyril Charron; Guillaume Belliard; Bernard Page; François Jardin Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: James A Russell; Keith R Walley; Joel Singer; Anthony C Gordon; Paul C Hébert; D James Cooper; Cheryl L Holmes; Sangeeta Mehta; John T Granton; Michelle M Storms; Deborah J Cook; Jeffrey J Presneill; Dieter Ayers Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-02-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Charles L Sprung; Djillali Annane; Didier Keh; Rui Moreno; Mervyn Singer; Klaus Freivogel; Yoram G Weiss; Julie Benbenishty; Armin Kalenka; Helmuth Forst; Pierre-Francois Laterre; Konrad Reinhart; Brian H Cuthbertson; Didier Payen; Josef Briegel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-01-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Fatemeh Fattahi; Lynn M Frydrych; Guowu Bian; Miriam Kalbitz; Todd J Herron; Elizabeth A Malan; Matthew J Delano; Peter A Ward Journal: Mol Immunol Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 4.407
Authors: Ricardo Costa Petroni; Suelen Jeronymo Souza de Oliveira; Thais Pineda Fungaro; Suely K K Ariga; Hermes Vieira Barbeiro; Francisco Garcia Soriano; Thais Martins de Lima Journal: Inflammation Date: 2022-04-11 Impact factor: 4.657
Authors: Ha-Yeun Chung; Anna S Kollmey; Andrea Schrepper; Matthias Kohl; Markus F Bläss; Sebastian N Stehr; Amelie Lupp; Markus H Gräler; Ralf A Claus Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2017-04-15 Impact factor: 5.923