Literature DB >> 24051797

What makes a visualization memorable?

Michelle A Borkin1, Azalea A Vo, Zoya Bylinskii, Phillip Isola, Shashank Sunkavalli, Aude Oliva, Hanspeter Pfister.   

Abstract

An ongoing debate in the Visualization community concerns the role that visualization types play in data understanding. In human cognition, understanding and memorability are intertwined. As a first step towards being able to ask questions about impact and effectiveness, here we ask: 'What makes a visualization memorable?' We ran the largest scale visualization study to date using 2,070 single-panel visualizations, categorized with visualization type (e.g., bar chart, line graph, etc.), collected from news media sites, government reports, scientific journals, and infographic sources. Each visualization was annotated with additional attributes, including ratings for data-ink ratios and visual densities. Using Amazon's Mechanical Turk, we collected memorability scores for hundreds of these visualizations, and discovered that observers are consistent in which visualizations they find memorable and forgettable. We find intuitive results (e.g., attributes like color and the inclusion of a human recognizable object enhance memorability) and less intuitive results (e.g., common graphs are less memorable than unique visualization types). Altogether our findings suggest that quantifying memorability is a general metric of the utility of information, an essential step towards determining how to design effective visualizations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24051797     DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2013.234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph        ISSN: 1077-2626            Impact factor:   4.579


  10 in total

1.  Preferences of Knowledge Users for Two Formats of Summarizing Results from Systematic Reviews: Infographics and Critical Appraisals.

Authors:  Katelynn Crick; Lisa Hartling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Development of a Tailored Analysis System for Korean Working Conditions Survey.

Authors:  Hwa Jeong Seo
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2016-04-29

3.  Optimizing data visualization for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child health, and nutrition (RMNCH&N) policymaking: data visualization preferences and interpretation capacity among decision-makers in Tanzania.

Authors:  Tricia Aung; Debora Niyeha; Shagihilu Shagihilu; Rose Mpembeni; Joyceline Kaganda; Ashley Sheffel; Rebecca Heidkamp
Journal:  Glob Health Res Policy       Date:  2019-02-15

4.  MemCat: a new category-based image set quantified on memorability.

Authors:  Lore Goetschalckx; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  VIStory: interactive storyboard for exploring visual information in scientific publications.

Authors:  Wei Zeng; Ao Dong; Xi Chen; Zhang-Lin Cheng
Journal:  J Vis (Tokyo)       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 1.974

6.  Best Graph Type to Compare Discrete Groups: Bar, Dot, and Tally.

Authors:  Fang Zhao; Robert Gaschler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-24

7.  Which emphasis technique to use? Perception of emphasis techniques with varying distractors, backgrounds, and visualization types.

Authors:  Aristides Mairena; Carl Gutwin; Andy Cockburn
Journal:  Inf Vis       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 0.956

8.  Ten simple rules for better figures.

Authors:  Nicolas P Rougier; Michael Droettboom; Philip E Bourne
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Virtual environments as memory training devices in navigational tasks for older adults.

Authors:  Ismini E Lokka; Arzu Çöltekin; Jan Wiener; Sara I Fabrikant; Christina Röcke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Prediction of Visual Memorability with EEG Signals: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Sang-Yeong Jo; Jin-Woo Jeong
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.