Literature DB >> 24051658

Urban form and psychosocial factors: do they interact for leisure-time walking?

Mariëlle A Beenackers1, Carlijn B M Kamphuis, Richard G Prins, Johan P Mackenbach, Alex Burdorf, Frank J van Lenthe.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This cross-sectional study uses an adaptation of a social-ecological model on the hierarchy of walking needs to explore direct associations and interactions of urban-form characteristics and individual psychosocial factors for leisure-time walking.
METHODS: Questionnaire data (n = 736) from adults (25-74 yr) and systematic field observations within 14 neighborhoods in Eindhoven (the Netherlands) were used. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to relate the urban-form characteristics (accessibility, safety, comfort, and pleasurability) and individual psychosocial factors (attitude, self-efficacy, social influence, and intention) to two definitions of leisure-time walking, that is, any leisure-time walking and sufficient leisure-time walking according to the Dutch physical activity norm and to explore their interactions.
RESULTS: Leisure-time walking was associated with psychosocial factors but not with characteristics of the urban environment. For sufficient leisure-time walking, interactions between attitude and several urban-form characteristics were found, indicating that positive urban-form characteristics contributed toward leisure-time walking only in residents with a less positive attitude toward physical activity. In contrast, living in a neighborhood that was accessible for walking was stronger associated with leisure-time walking among residents who experienced a positive social influence to engage in physical activity compared with those who reported less social influence.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed some evidence for an interaction between the neighborhood environment and the individual psychosocial factors in explaining leisure-time walking. The specific mechanism of interaction may depend on the specific combination of psychosocial factor and environmental factor. The lack of association between urban form and leisure-time walking could be partly due to the little variation in urban-form characteristics between neighborhoods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24051658     DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  8 in total

1.  Interactions between psychological and environmental characteristics and their impacts on walking.

Authors:  Yong Yang
Journal:  J Transp Health       Date:  2015-06-01

2.  Independent Associations and Interactions of Perceived Neighborhood and Psychosocial Constructs on Adults' Physical Activity.

Authors:  Laura A Dwyer; Minal Patel; Linda C Nebeling; April Y Oh
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2018-03-23

Review 3.  The Associations Between Urban Form and Major Non-communicable Diseases: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Zeynab Sadat Fazeli Dehkordi; Seyed Mahdi Khatami; Ehsan Ranjbar
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 5.801

4.  The role of the natural and built environment in cycling duration in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Jie Gao; Carlijn B M Kamphuis; Martin Dijst; Marco Helbich
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 6.457

5.  Socioecological Correlates of Park-based Physical Activity in Older Adults: A Comparison of Hong Kong and Leipzig Parks.

Authors:  Ru Zhang; Yanping Duan; Walter Brehm; Petra Wagner
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  An exploratory analysis of the interactions between social norms and the built environment on cycling for recreation and transport.

Authors:  Matthew Bourke; Toni A Hilland; Melinda Craike
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Do associations of sex, age and education with transport and leisure-time physical activity differ across 17 cities in 12 countries?

Authors:  Josef Mitáš; Ester Cerin; Rodrigo Siqueira Reis; Terry L Conway; Kelli L Cain; Marc A Adams; Grant Schofield; Olga L Sarmiento; Lars B Christiansen; Rachel Davey; Deborah Salvo; Rosario Orzanco-Garralda; Duncan Macfarlane; Adriano Akira F Hino; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Neville Owen; Delfien Van Dyck; James F Sallis
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 6.457

8.  Differences in social and physical dimensions of perceived walkability in Mexican American and non-hispanic white walking environments in Tucson, Arizona.

Authors:  Arlie Adkins; Gabriela Barillas-Longoria; Deyanira Nevárez Martínez; Maia Ingram
Journal:  J Transp Health       Date:  2019-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.