E S Novitskaya1, V Kostakis1, S C Broster2, L E Allen1. 1. Ophthalmology Department, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK. 2. Neonatal Department, Rosie Maternity Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the tolerability and outcomes of laser treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) under sub-tenon anaesthetic with oral or rectal sedation using a reliable, multidimensional, and internationally accepted tool for assessment of neonatal pain. METHODS: Sixty-two babies have had ROP laser treatment in our neonatal unit in the 7-year interval between 1 March 2005 and 28 February 2012; 44% (27 of the 62) were performed using sub-tenon anaesthesia. Pain scores were routinely assessed using the Neonatal Pain Agitation and Sedation Scale (N-PASS) every 10 min during laser treatment. The outcome and requirement for re-treatment in this group was compared with that in the intravenous sedation group. RESULTS: Pain scores were available in 19 of the 27 babies treated under sub-tenon anaesthesia. The mean pain score during treatment was 2.7 (SD ± 1.7, range 0.5-6.2). There was no statistically significant correlation between the mean pain score and duration of treatment (Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) = 0.31; P = 0.09), number of laser burns (ρ = 0.32; P = 0.09), or post-menstrual age of the baby at the time of treatment (ρ = 0.38; P = 0.052). Treatments performed under sub-tenon anaesthesia were as successful as those performed under intravenous sedation. The mean pain scores during laser treatment under sub-tenon anaesthesia in our study were lower than those previously reported during ROP screening or heel-stick procedure.Conclusion Our study demonstrated that sub-tenon anaesthesia with oral or rectal sedation provides sufficient pain control for laser treatment for ROP without the need or risks of intravenous sedation and intubation.
PURPOSE: To assess the tolerability and outcomes of laser treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) under sub-tenon anaesthetic with oral or rectal sedation using a reliable, multidimensional, and internationally accepted tool for assessment of neonatal pain. METHODS: Sixty-two babies have had ROP laser treatment in our neonatal unit in the 7-year interval between 1 March 2005 and 28 February 2012; 44% (27 of the 62) were performed using sub-tenon anaesthesia. Pain scores were routinely assessed using the Neonatal Pain Agitation and Sedation Scale (N-PASS) every 10 min during laser treatment. The outcome and requirement for re-treatment in this group was compared with that in the intravenous sedation group. RESULTS:Pain scores were available in 19 of the 27 babies treated under sub-tenon anaesthesia. The mean pain score during treatment was 2.7 (SD ± 1.7, range 0.5-6.2). There was no statistically significant correlation between the mean pain score and duration of treatment (Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) = 0.31; P = 0.09), number of laser burns (ρ = 0.32; P = 0.09), or post-menstrual age of the baby at the time of treatment (ρ = 0.38; P = 0.052). Treatments performed under sub-tenon anaesthesia were as successful as those performed under intravenous sedation. The mean pain scores during laser treatment under sub-tenon anaesthesia in our study were lower than those previously reported during ROP screening or heel-stick procedure.Conclusion Our study demonstrated that sub-tenon anaesthesia with oral or rectal sedation provides sufficient pain control for laser treatment for ROP without the need or risks of intravenous sedation and intubation.
Authors: A O'Sullivan; M O'Connor; D Brosnahan; K McCreery; E M Dempsey Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2010-09-28 Impact factor: 5.747