Literature DB >> 24051083

Evaluation of the Simplified Comorbidity Score (Colinet) as a prognostic indicator for patients with lung cancer: a cancer registry study.

David Ball1, Vicky Thursfield, Louis Irving, Paul Mitchell, Gary Richardson, Yvonne Torn-Broers, Gavin Wright, Graham Giles.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A Simplified Comorbidity Score (SCS) provided additional prognostic information to the established factors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer lung cancer. We undertook this analysis to test the prognostic value of the SCS in a population-based study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective survey of all Victorians diagnosed with lung cancer in January-June 2003, identified from the Victorian Cancer Registry.
RESULTS: There were 921 patients, with data available for 841 (91.3%). Median age was 72 years (range 30-94) and 63.1% were male. A tissue diagnosis was made for 89.9%, of which 86.6% were non-small cell (NSCLC), and 13.4% small cell carcinoma (SCLC). Comorbidities on which the SCS is based were distributed: cardiovascular 54.6%; respiratory 38.9%; neoplastic 19.9%; renal 4.6%; diabetes 11.7%; alcoholism 5.5%; and tobacco 83.1%. In patients with NSCLC, higher SCS score (>9) was associated with increasing stage, ECOG performance status, male sex, increasing age, tobacco consumption and not receiving treatment. Using Cox regression, survival was analysed by SCS score after adjusting for the effect of age, sex, cell type (NSCLC, SCLC, no histology), ECOG performance status and stage for all patients and then restricted to NSCLC. As a continuous or dichotomous (≤ or >9) variable, SCS was not a significant prognostic factor for all patients or when restricted to NSCLC.
CONCLUSION: In this retrospective analysis of population based registry patients, SCS did not provide additional prognostic information in patients with lung cancer. ECOG performance status may be a substitute for the effect of comorbidity.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comorbidity; Non-small cell lung cancer; Prognostic factors; Small cell lung cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24051083     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  8 in total

1.  Efficacy of second-line treatment and importance of comorbidity scores and clinical parameters affecting prognosis in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer without epidermal growth factor receptor mutations.

Authors:  Sung Yong Lee; Eun Joo Kang; Suk Young Lee; Hong Jun Kim; Kyung Hoon Min; Gyu Young Hur; Jae Jeong Shim; Kyung Ho Kang; Sang Cheul Oh; Jae Hong Seo; Jun Suk Kim
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Simplified comorbidity score for elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer.

Authors:  Tomohiro Haruki; Yohei Yurugi; Makoto Wakahara; Yuki Matsuoka; Ken Miwa; Kunio Araki; Yuji Taniguchi; Hiroshige Nakamura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Validation of EORTC and CALGB prognostic models in surgical patients submitted to diagnostic, palliative or curative surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Alberto Sandri; Francesco Guerrera; Matteo Roffinella; Stefania Olivetti; Lorena Costardi; Alberto Oliaro; Pier Luigi Filosso; Paolo Olivo Lausi; Enrico Ruffini
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Comorbidities with non-small cell lung cancer: Is there an interdisciplinary consensus needed to qualify patients for surgical treatment?

Authors:  Marta Lembicz; Piotr Gabryel; Beata Brajer-Luftmann; Wojciech Dyszkiewicz; Halina Batura-Gabryel
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.219

5.  Circulating Levels of the Cardiovascular Biomarkers ST2 and Adrenomedullin Predict Outcome within a Randomized Phase III Lung Cancer Trial (RASTEN).

Authors:  Emelie Gezelius; Pär-Ola Bendahl; Widet Gallo; Kelin Gonçalves de Oliveira; Lars Ek; Bengt Bergman; Jan Sundberg; Olle Melander; Mattias Belting
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Impact of subsequent chemotherapy on the survival of elderly patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Eun Joo Kang; Yoon Ji Choi; Se Ryeon Lee; Hwa Jung Sung; Jung Sun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.884

7.  Effect of Comorbidity on Outcomes of Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Anti-PD1 Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Xianghua Zeng; Shicong Zhu; Cheng Xu; Zhongyu Wang; Xingxing Su; Dong Zeng; Haixia Long; Bo Zhu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-09-07

8.  Survival Prediction Model Using Clinico-Pathologic Characteristics for Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Patients After Curative Resection.

Authors:  Ching-Yang Wu; Jui-Ying Fu; Ching-Feng Wu; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Yun-Hen Liu; Yi-Cheng Wu; Cheng-Ta Yang; Ying-Huang Tsai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.