Literature DB >> 24051067

Does aptitude influence the rate at which proficiency is achieved for laparoscopic appendectomy?

Christina E Buckley1, Dara O Kavanagh, Tom K Gallagher, Ronan M Conroy, Oscar J Traynor, Paul C Neary.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The attainment of technical competence for surgical procedures is fundamental to a proficiency-based surgical training program. We hypothesized that aptitude may directly affect one's ability to successfully complete the learning curve for minimally invasive procedures. The aim was to assess whether aptitude has an impact on ability to achieve proficiency in completing a simulated minimally invasive surgical procedure. The index procedure chosen was a laparoscopic appendectomy. STUDY
DESIGN: Two groups of medical students with disparate aptitude were selected. Aptitude (visual-spatial, depth perception, and psychomotor ability) was measured by previously validated tests. Indicators of technical proficiency for laparoscopic appendectomy were established by trained surgeons with an individual case volume of more than 150. All subjects were tested consecutively on the ProMIS III (Haptica) until they reached predefined proficiency in this procedure. Simulator metrics, critical error scores, and Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) scores were recorded.
RESULTS: The mean numbers of attempts to achieve proficiency in performing a laparoscopic appendectomy for group A (high aptitude) and B (low aptitude) were 6 (range 4 to 7) and 14 (range 10 to 18), respectively (p < 0.0001). Significant differences were found between the 2 groups for path length (p = 0.014), error score (p = 0.021), and OSATS score (p < 0.0001) at the initial attempt.
CONCLUSIONS: High aptitude is directly related to a rapid attainment of proficiency. These findings suggest that resource allocation for proficiency-based technical training in surgery may need to be tailored according to a trainee's natural ability.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24051067     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  14 in total

1.  Predictive value of background experiences and visual spatial ability testing on laparoscopic baseline performance among residents entering postgraduate surgical training.

Authors:  Marisa Louridas; Lauren E Quinn; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Should we use virtual simulators for surgical resident selection?

Authors:  Luca Morelli; Gregorio Di Franco; Andrea Moglia; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-01-03

3.  Distribution of innate psychomotor skills recognized as important for surgical specialization in unconditioned medical undergraduates.

Authors:  Andrea Moglia; Luca Morelli; Vincenzo Ferrari; Mauro Ferrari; Franco Mosca; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Training or non-surgical factors-what determines a good surgical performance? A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Cornelia Lindlohr; R Lefering; S Saad; M M Heiss; C Pape-Köhler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  A multilevel, step-based model to evaluate progress in procedure efficiency for laparoscopic appendicectomy in surgical training: structured evaluation using 'ebb-and-flow' and 'string-of-pearls' concepts.

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide; Benedicte Skjold-Ødegaard
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-05-02

6.  Visuospatial abilities and fine motor experiences influence acquisition and maintenance of fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) task performance.

Authors:  Cuan M Harrington; Patrick Dicker; Oscar Traynor; Dara O Kavanagh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  One or two trainees per workplace in a structured multimodality training curriculum for laparoscopic surgery? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial - DRKS00004675.

Authors:  Felix Nickel; Felix Jede; Andreas Minassian; Matthias Gondan; Jonathan D Hendrie; Tobias Gehrig; Georg R Linke; Martina Kadmon; Lars Fischer; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  The 6 T's of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Roger Härtl
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28

9.  Learning from the surgeon's real perspective - First-person view versus laparoscopic view in e-learning for training of surgical skills? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mona Wanda Schmidt; Mirco Friedrich; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Javier De La Garza; Thomas Bruckner; Beat-Peter Müller-Stich; Felix Nickel
Journal:  Int J Surg Protoc       Date:  2017-01-23

10.  Spatial abilities training in the field of technical skills in health care: A systematic review.

Authors:  Jean Langlois; Christian Bellemare; Josée Toulouse; George A Wells
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.