| Literature DB >> 24050920 |
Oscar Hammarfjord1, Johan Roslund, Peter Abrahamsson, Peter Nilsson, Andreas Thor, Mikael Magnusson, Göran Kjeller, Charlotta Englesson-Sahlström, Tomas Strandkvist, Gunnar Warfvinge, Carina Krüger-Weiner.
Abstract
Our aim was to evaluate the treatment given to patients with intraosseus ameloblastomas with special emphasis on recurrence and the outcomes of primary and secondary resection. Forty-eight patients who were treated for intraosseous ameloblastoma at 8 centres across Sweden met the inclusion criteria. They showed typical distribution of age, sex, site of lesion, and characteristic presenting features. Eleven of the 48 were initially treated with radical resection and none recurred. Twenty-two of the remaining 37 who were initially treated by conservative resection presented with recurrences. Sixteen of the 22 then had conservative secondary resections, which resulted in further recurrence in 6 patients. Initial radical resection is therefore superior to conservative management as far as recurrences are concerned. We argue, however, that a conservative surgical approach is adequate for many intraosseous ameloblastomas with limited extension, because relapse can be followed by radical resection if clinically indicated in selected cases.Entities:
Keywords: Ameloblastoma; Odontogenic neoplasm; Recurrent ameloblastoma
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24050920 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.08.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ISSN: 0266-4356 Impact factor: 1.651