Literature DB >> 24050517

The epidemiology of long- and short-term cancer survivors. A population-based cohort study exploring denominators for rehabilitation and palliative care programs.

Lene Jarlbaek1, Linda Christensen, Eduardo Bruera, Dorte Gilså Hansen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we present data from a population-based cohort of incident cancer patients separated in long- and short-term survivors. Our aim was to procure denominators for use in the planning of rehabilitation and palliative care programs.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A registry-linkage cohort study. All cancer patients, diagnosed from 1993 to 2003 from a 470 000 large population, were followed individually from diagnosis to death or until 31 December 2008. Long-term survivors lived five years or more after the time of the cancer diagnosis (TOCD). Short-term survivors died less than five years after TOCD.
RESULTS: The cohort comprised 24 162 incident cancer patients with 41% long-term survivors (N = 9813). Seventy percent of the cohort was 60 + years at TOCD. The 14 349 short-term survivors' median survival was 0.6 year, and 78% died less than two years after TOCD. A 12 years' difference in age at TOCD was seen between long- and short-term survivors, with median ages of 60 versus 72 years, respectively. Females comprised 64% of long-term, and 46% of short-term survivors. The proportion of breast and lung cancers differed between the groups: Long-term survivors: 31% breast cancer, 2.4% lung cancer. Short-term survivors: 21% lung cancer, 7.2% breast cancer. Chemotherapy was provided to 15% of all patients, and to 10% of the 60 + year olds. DISCUSSION: The epidemiology of long- and short-term survivors shows significant differences with regard to age at TOCD, cancer types and sex. Two-year crude cancer survival seems as a clinically relevant cut point for characterizing potential "denominators" for rehabilitation or palliative care programs. From this cohort of incident cancer patients, and using two-year survival as a cut point, it could be estimated that 54% would candidate to a "care trajectory" focusing on rehabilitation and 46% a "care trajectory" focusing on palliative care at TOCD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24050517     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.831471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  2 in total

1.  Who are the cancer survivors? A nationwide study in Denmark, 1943-2010.

Authors:  H B Hovaldt; N P Suppli; M H Olsen; M Steding-Jessen; D G Hansen; H Møller; C Johansen; S O Dalton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 2.  The Intersection of Oncology Prognosis and Cancer Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Sean Robinson Smith; Jasmine Yiqian Zheng
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2017-03-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.