Literature DB >> 24050454

Turning for Ulcer ReductioN: a multisite randomized clinical trial in nursing homes.

Nancy Bergstrom1, Susan D Horn, Mary Pat Rapp, Anita Stern, Ryan Barrett, Michael Watkiss.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine optimal repositioning frequency of nursing home (NH) residents at risk for pressure ulcers (PrUs) when cared for on high-density foam mattresses.
DESIGN: Multisite, randomized, clinical trial, known as Turning for Ulcer ReductioN (TURN Study). SETTINGS: NHs in the United States (n = 20) and Canada (n = 7) using high-density foam mattresses. PARTICIPANTS: Consenting residents (N = 942) aged 65 and older without PrUs at moderate (scores 13-14) or high (scores 10-12) risk of PrUs according to the Braden Scale. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly allocated using risk stratification (moderate vs high) to a repositioning schedule (2, 3, or 4 hour) for 3 weeks. Blinded assessors assessed skin weekly. MEASUREMENTS: PrU incidence (coccyx or sacrum, trochanter, heels).
RESULTS: Participants were mostly female (77.6%) and Caucasian (80.5%) and had a mean age of 85.1 ± 7.7. The most common diagnoses were cardiovascular (76.9%) and dementia (72.5%). Nineteen (2.0%) participants developed superficial PrUs. There was no significant difference (Wilcoxon test for ordered categories) in PrU incidence (P = .68) according to repositioning group (2 hour, 8/321, 2.5%; 3 hour, 2/326, 0.6%; 4 hour, 9/295, 3.1%), nor was there a statistically significant difference in the incidence of PrU between the high and moderate-risk groups (P = .79). Also, PrU incidence was not statistically significantly different between high-risk participants based on repositioning schedule (6/325, 1.8%, P = .90) or between moderate-risk participants based on repositioning schedule (13/617, 2.1%, P = .68).
CONCLUSION: There was no difference in PrU incidence over 3 weeks of observation between those turned at 2-, 3-, or 4-hour intervals in this population of residents using high-density foam mattresses at moderate and high risk of developing PrUs when they were repositioned consistently and skin was monitored. This finding has major implications for use of nursing staff and cost of NH care.
© 2013, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2013, The American Geriatrics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Turning for Ulcer ReductioN Study; nursing home; pressure ulcer prevention; repositioning

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24050454     DOI: 10.1111/jgs.12440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  19 in total

1.  Pressure Ulcer Monitoring Platform-A Prospective, Human Subject Clinical Study to Validate Patient Repositioning Monitoring Device to Prevent Pressure Ulcers.

Authors:  Danielle M Minteer; Patsy Simon; Donald P Taylor; Wenyan Jia; Yuecheng Li; Mingui Sun; J Peter Rubin
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  International consensus on pressure injury preventative interventions by risk level for critically ill patients: A modified Delphi study.

Authors:  Josephine Lovegrove; Paul Fulbrook; Sandra Miles
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Subepidermal moisture detection of pressure induced tissue damage on the trunk: The pressure ulcer detection study outcomes.

Authors:  Barbara M Bates-Jensen; Heather E McCreath; Anabel Patlan
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.617

4.  An Evidence-Based Cue-Selection Guide and Logic Model to Improve Pressure Ulcer Prevention in Long-term Care.

Authors:  Tracey L Yap; Susan M Kennerly; Nancy Bergstrom; Sandra L Hudak; Susan D Horn
Journal:  J Nurs Care Qual       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.597

5.  Impact of Cognition and Handfeeding Assistance on Nutritional Intake for Nursing Home Residents.

Authors:  Melissa Batchelor-Murphy; Susan M Kennerly; Susan D Horn; Ryan Barrett; Nancy Bergstrom; Lisa Boss; Tracey L Yap
Journal:  J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2019-05-24

Review 6.  Turning frequency in adult bedridden patients to prevent hospital-acquired pressure ulcer: A scoping review.

Authors:  H-S Jocelyn Chew; Emelia Thiara; Violeta Lopez; Shefaly Shorey
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Turning High-Risk Individuals: An Economic Evaluation of Repositioning Frequency in Long-Term Care.

Authors:  Petros Pechlivanoglou; Mike Paulden; Ba' Pham; Josephine Wong; Susan D Horn; Murray Krahn
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Nursing staff induced repositionings and immobile patients' spontaneous movements in nursing care.

Authors:  Ulrika Källman; Sara Bergstrand; Anna-Christina Ek; Maria Engström; Margareta Lindgren
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Repositioning Practice of Bedridden Patients: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis.

Authors:  Abdulkareem S Iblasi; Yupin Aungsuroch; Joko Gunawan; I Gede Juanamasta; Cheryl Carver
Journal:  SAGE Open Nurs       Date:  2022-06-13

10.  Influence of Nutrition and Nonnutrition Factors on Pressure Injury Outcomes Among At-Risk Asian Nursing Home Residents.

Authors:  Tracey L Yap; Susan Kennerly; Susan D Horn; Ryan Barrett; Jequie Dixon; Nancy Bergstrom
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.347

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.