Literature DB >> 2404918

Comparison of different radiation types and irradiation geometries in stereotactic radiosurgery.

M H Phillips1, K A Frankel, J T Lyman, J I Fabrikant, R P Levy.   

Abstract

Recent interest in stereotactic radiosurgery of intracranial lesions, and the development of stereotactic irradiation techniques has led to the need for a systematic and complete comparison of these methods. A method for conducting these comparisons is proposed and is applied to a set of currently-used stereotactic radiosurgical techniques. Three-dimensional treatment planning calculations are used to compare dose distributions for several different radiation types and irradiation geometries. Calculations were performed using charged particles (H, He, C, and Ne ions) and the irradiation geometry currently used at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. Photons in the Gamma Knife configuration and the Heidelberg Linac arc method are used. The 3-dimensional dose distributions were evaluated by means of dose-volume histograms and integral doses to the target volume and to normal brain. The effects of target volume, shape and location are studied. The charged particle dose distributions are more favorable than those of the photon methods. The differences between charged particles and photons increase with increasing target volume. The differences between different charged particle species are small, as are the effects of target shape and location.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2404918     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(90)90286-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  6 in total

1.  3-D dosimetric methodology in multiple isocentres radiosurgery: the influence of dose-volume histograms on the choice of the reference isodose.

Authors:  D Lefkopoulos; M Schlienger; E Touboul; M C Plazas; L Merienne
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Fractionated Proton Radiation Therapy and Hearing Preservation for Vestibular Schwannoma: Preliminary Analysis of a Prospective Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Anurag Saraf; Luke R G Pike; Kevin H Franck; Nora K Horick; Beow Y Yeap; Barbara C Fullerton; Irene S Wang; Mohamed E Abazeed; Michael J McKenna; William A Mehan; Scott R Plotkin; Jay S Loeffler; Helen A Shih
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Comparative study of dose distribution between carbon ion radiotherapy and photon radiotherapy for head and neck tumor.

Authors:  M Amirul Islam; Takeshi Yanagi; Jun-Etsu Mizoe; Hideyuki Mizuno; Hirohiko Tsujii
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2008-09-04

Review 4.  Flourish of Proton and Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in China.

Authors:  Yue Li; Xiaoman Li; Jiancheng Yang; Sicheng Wang; Meitang Tang; Jiawen Xia; Yunzhe Gao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  Radiosurgery with photons or protons for benign and malignant tumours of the skull base: a review.

Authors:  Maurizio Amichetti; Dante Amelio; Giuseppe Minniti
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Clinical outcome after particle therapy for meningiomas of the skull base: toxicity and local control in patients treated with active rasterscanning.

Authors:  Rami A El Shafie; Maja Czech; Kerstin A Kessel; Daniel Habermehl; Dorothea Weber; Stefan Rieken; Nina Bougatf; Oliver Jäkel; Jürgen Debus; Stephanie E Combs
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.481

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.