Simone Ullrich1, Robert Keers1, Jeremy W Coid2. 1. Forensic Psychiatry Research Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK. 2. Forensic Psychiatry Research Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK j.w.coid@qmul.ac.uk.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Recent research on the association between delusions and violence has suggested complex and differing pathways. Furthermore, it has been emphasized that temporal proximity is fundamental when investigating these relationships. We reanalyzed data from the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study utilizing a different methodological approach to investigate associations between specific delusions and violence. METHODS: Longitudinal study of 1136 male and female civil psychiatric inpatients after discharge. Delusions, affect due to delusions, and violence were measured at baseline and in 5 follow-up assessments. Serious violence was established using the MacArthur Community Violence Interview. Logistic mixed-effect models for repeated measures were performed. RESULTS: A "prospective" model confirmed previous findings that delusions do not predict later violence. However, reanalysis, considering temporal proximity, indicated a relationship between specific delusions and outcome including: being spied upon (adjusted OR [AOR] = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.06-2.47, P = .027), being followed (AOR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.29-2.80, P = .001), being plotted against (AOR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.14-2.52, P = .009), being under control of person/force (AOR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.24-2.97, P = .003), thought insertion (AOR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.00-2.66, P = .048), and having special gifts/powers (AOR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.31-2.92, P = .001). All these delusions were associated with angry affect (P < .05). Inclusion of anger in the model significantly attenuated the main effects (except grandiose delusions), indicating an indirect pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Temporal proximity is crucial when investigating relationships between delusions and violence. Anger due to delusions is the key factor in this pathway. Our findings have important implications for identification of psychotic patients at risk for violent behavior and, most importantly, management of their risk.
INTRODUCTION: Recent research on the association between delusions and violence has suggested complex and differing pathways. Furthermore, it has been emphasized that temporal proximity is fundamental when investigating these relationships. We reanalyzed data from the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study utilizing a different methodological approach to investigate associations between specific delusions and violence. METHODS: Longitudinal study of 1136 male and female civil psychiatric inpatients after discharge. Delusions, affect due to delusions, and violence were measured at baseline and in 5 follow-up assessments. Serious violence was established using the MacArthur Community Violence Interview. Logistic mixed-effect models for repeated measures were performed. RESULTS: A "prospective" model confirmed previous findings that delusions do not predict later violence. However, reanalysis, considering temporal proximity, indicated a relationship between specific delusions and outcome including: being spied upon (adjusted OR [AOR] = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.06-2.47, P = .027), being followed (AOR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.29-2.80, P = .001), being plotted against (AOR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.14-2.52, P = .009), being under control of person/force (AOR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.24-2.97, P = .003), thought insertion (AOR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.00-2.66, P = .048), and having special gifts/powers (AOR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.31-2.92, P = .001). All these delusions were associated with angry affect (P < .05). Inclusion of anger in the model significantly attenuated the main effects (except grandiose delusions), indicating an indirect pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Temporal proximity is crucial when investigating relationships between delusions and violence. Anger due to delusions is the key factor in this pathway. Our findings have important implications for identification of psychotic patients at risk for violent behavior and, most importantly, management of their risk.
Authors: Jeffrey W Swanson; Marvin S Swartz; Richard A Van Dorn; Eric B Elbogen; H Ryan Wagner; Robert A Rosenheck; T Scott Stroup; Joseph P McEvoy; Jeffrey A Lieberman Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2006-05
Authors: J J Hudziak; J E Helzer; M W Wetzel; K B Kessel; B McGee; A Janca; T Przybeck Journal: Compr Psychiatry Date: 1993 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.735
Authors: Gary Brucato; Paul S Appelbaum; Michael D Masucci; Stephanie Rolin; Melanie M Wall; Mark Levin; Rebecca Altschuler; Michael B First; Jeffrey A Lieberman; Ragy R Girgis Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2018-12-27 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Ken O'Reilly; Gary Donohoe; Ciaran Coyle; Danny O'Sullivan; Arann Rowe; Mairead Losty; Tracey McDonagh; Lasairiona McGuinness; Yvette Ennis; Elizabeth Watts; Louise Brennan; Elizabeth Owens; Mary Davoren; Ronan Mullaney; Zareena Abidin; Harry G Kennedy Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2015-07-10 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Steven Honings; Marjan Drukker; Margreet Ten Have; Ron de Graaf; Saskia van Dorsselaer; Jim van Os Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 3.240